С 8 марта, коллеги 🌸 Надеюсь, вы успели сделать оборот вчера 📈 Потому что сегодня цветы, подарки и хорошее настроение сами себя не оплатят 💐 Работаем… но уже немного аккуратнее 😄
❤5

Channel
@guenosTM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003693275835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guenosTM |
| Created | 9 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guenosTM |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 9 | -1 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 10 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 11 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 11 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 9 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
103 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 50.5% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 16.5% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 11.7% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5469796926272580161 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| custom 6039862635481013428 | 3 | 2.91% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 2.91% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С 8 марта, коллеги 🌸 Надеюсь, вы успели сделать оборот вчера 📈 Потому что сегодня цветы, подарки и хорошее настроение сами себя не оплатят 💐 Работаем… но уже немного аккуратнее 😄
❤5
Тадж снова зависает, коллеги? 🥲 Работаешь 10 часов, а реально крутишь 2–3. Остальное время ждёшь, пока всё «оживёт». Знакомо? Мы тоже от этого устали. Поэтому сейчас активно тестим РУ откупы. Пока всё показывает себя очень стабильно.📈 Если всё пойдёт так же, уже завтра будем переводить все команды на РУ, чтобы работа шла ровно, а не рывками. ⚙️ Искали долго. Тестировали много. Но кажется, нашли то, что нужно. 🤝…
❤4👍2custom 60398626354810134281
Real: Процессингология: Главный навык в процессинге: Уметь сохранять спокойствие когда приходит письмо: “We need to ask you a few questions…”
❤2😁1
Долго не выходили на связь — подводил Билайн. Но мы нашли обходное решение и можем двигаться дальше. Тесты прошли успешно. ✅ Работа продолжается. Совсем скоро поделимся подробной информацией!
❤4🔥1
ЛК до сих пор в работе. Результаты на 28 февраля.
❤5
💳 Т-Банк — ФЕРМА ✔️Перед началом работы: •Сделать «перевяз» (отлёга) вместе с «гревом» на 4–5 дней. •Пополнить счёт на 2 000 ₽ и подключить подписку Pro (через тот же банкомат, через который планируете снимать наличные). •В течение 4 дней потратить всю сумму — чем больше категорий расходов, тем лучше. •Совершать покупки на маркетплейсах (Ozon, WB). •Открыть накопительный счёт и положить на него 150 ₽. •Перед …
❤5custom 60398626354810134282
Когда цифры начинают расти-мы делаем вид, что так и планировали.
❤3😁3
День в Ctrl+Alt+DeFi 📈 Кто-то проверяет погоду. Кто-то — курс. Ты — апелляции и споры. Если день начался без писем от банка - значит, уже победа Работаем🦾
❤5👍2
real: ПРОЦЕССИНГОЛОГИЯ Это не успех. Это просто математика, которая решила работать на нас.
😁4❤3
👋 Привет! Здесь не будет: ❌громких слов. ❌ обещаний. ❌магии. Ctrl+Alt+DeFi — это про перезагрузку мышления. Про то, как всё работает на самом деле. Если интересно — добро пожаловать 🚀
❤3👍3
К словам о наших трейдерах. Результаты говорят сами за себя 📊 Пока кто-то сомневается, наши показывают цифры! Работаем системно. Работаем стабильно. Работаем на результат. 🚀💪
❤5🔥3
real: ПРОЦЕССИНГОЛОГИЯ Самое приятное в этой работе - это когда калькулятор говорит «ДОСТАТОЧНО»
😁4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @guenosTM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@guenosTM named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ctrl+Alt+DeFi” (@guenosTM), 9 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guenosTM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.