23 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC288 viewsread 8 August 2026
舔狗不得好死🐊
Channel
瓜皮，你别皮。
@guapishe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
642subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001805617763 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guapishe |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guapishe |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 642 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 645 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 642 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 645 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 645 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
23 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC285 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
23 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC287 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
福建安溪17岁男孩和女友一起上学的路上不幸猝死，据传是因为男孩长期熬夜导致的，而两人聊天记录显示女孩十分拜金，通篇下来都是要钱，不是买玩偶就是口红香水衣服鞋子， 还要买城堡... 男孩妈妈给他的生活费都给女孩了，女孩还不让男孩睡觉，据说是让男孩给她的游戏上分。 当男孩晕倒时女孩也没有第一时间打电话，错过了最佳时机，事后女孩说有看到路上有人报警打120，她就去上学了。 男孩妈妈认为是女孩害死了自己儿子并在网上发声，随后女孩妈妈回应：男孩猝死是因为他长期熬夜、作息紊乱，早在认识自己女儿之前就已是常态，双方恋爱期间互有转账往来，剩余差额17500元，愿意主动结清，并警告男孩妈妈不要再进行人身攻击。 客观地说确实没有证据显示女孩和男孩的死有直接关系，但在道德层面很难让人接受，一个还在读高中的女孩竟然张口闭口就是要钱，完全不把男友当人看，为什么她还没步入社会就拥有这种扭曲病态的价值观？
21 Jul 2026, 04:51 UTC271 viewsread 8 August 2026
哥们，遇到委屈了。 别和老婆倒苦水，时间长了她会觉得你没本事。 也别和你妈讲，她会担心的睡不着。 要诉苦就找别人老婆诉苦，别人的老婆最会哄人了。🎃
14 Jun 2026, 11:09 UTC803 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
这个博主是一个烘焙师。然后她每天，都会把自己拉的屎，做成各种甜点！ PS:人活得久了，见识确实会多一点。
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @guapishe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 156,011 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“瓜皮，你别皮。” (@guapishe), 642 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guapishe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.