麦子 5-8 这几天麦子热度挺高的,本来安排在月底去,奈何有个HXD给我强烈安利,只能提前。麦子老客挺多的,侧面反映了好评确实多。纯正川妹子,属于邻家女孩那种,照片看着像是知性姐姐,见面才发现是属于邻家妹妹那种。确实不错,和照片7分像,年纪不大。大蟒蛇,该有的服务都有,有衣服可选。在小区里面环境还可以,比较安全。熊b 胸比较好耍。身材属于微胖型,性格很开朗那种,服务属于拉满那种。比较清口的那种,可冲。性价比拉满。颜值给7,身材给7,服务给8,性价比给9.5。推荐分给8。
👍19❤3

Channel
@guanxiriji
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
529subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001735749132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guanxiriji |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 13 October 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guanxiriji |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:46 | 529 | -5 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 534 | -6 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 540 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 543 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 545 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 549 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 554 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 557 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 557 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 13 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 50 | 78.1% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 20.3% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2022 to 23 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
麦子 5-8 这几天麦子热度挺高的,本来安排在月底去,奈何有个HXD给我强烈安利,只能提前。麦子老客挺多的,侧面反映了好评确实多。纯正川妹子,属于邻家女孩那种,照片看着像是知性姐姐,见面才发现是属于邻家妹妹那种。确实不错,和照片7分像,年纪不大。大蟒蛇,该有的服务都有,有衣服可选。在小区里面环境还可以,比较安全。熊b 胸比较好耍。身材属于微胖型,性格很开朗那种,服务属于拉满那种。比较清口的那种,可冲。性价比拉满。颜值给7,身材给7,服务给8,性价比给9.5。推荐分给8。
👍19❤3
瑶瑶2-2 最近闲暇,看到同学们在聊瑶瑶最近开课了。闲着也是闲着,很久没见到瑶瑶了。试探性发了句消息,本身没抱希望,瑶瑶开课前天正好有事,没赶得上提前约课。还是有缘分,同学水课,立即补位。还是老地方,每次来体验都不一样,不过女友感还是拉满。见面看到小礼裙惊讶到了 ,之前那个金发妹妹不见了,染成深色,配上礼裙,变知性姐姐了。第二次见面更熟络了些,体验比第一次要好些。 没啥好说的,约上冲就完了。绝对值。颜值给7.5,身材8,服务9。推荐分给9。
👍7❤2
Anna 2-2 看到狼友在讨论,就想再见见女友感爆棚的安娜,加上网红8分相似的颜值。冲,比较有缘分 ,临时约也能约上。毕竟安娜被称为尼斯湖水怪,暂时没体验过,运气还是比较好的。安娜的家乡有着我爱吃的特色,被安利的地道面馆,可惜总觉得味道不一样,可能只适合吃盗版口味。本来是下午的课,后改为尾课,求之不得。第二次体验还是拉满,可冲。颜值给7.5(不喜欢化妆的妹妹)身材给8,大长腿,嘿嘿。服务给9。推荐分不评了。自己看是不是喜欢的款。可无限回锅
👍4❤1
===== 评论区 ===== 猪皮恶霸 (🐷清心寡欲版🐷): 这就是加菜哥的生活吗,羡慕了羡慕了 出击回忆录: 真冠希哥 老狼阿锋: (➤出击回忆录) m y k x f s 老狼阿锋: 没有联系方式吗 Post: 你们去的那天应该是周2 Post: 朗诗 冠希: 安娜联系方式在军械库。 michale lethalz: 联系方式在哪哦
❤1👍1😁1
Anna 9-15 第一次见安娜是九月尾了吧。本来是没抱有多大期望的,见面后有点惊艳了,属于耐看型,越看越像某个网红。穿搭属于比较小女生那种,清纯系,进入正题就会给你一种强烈的反差感。很坏,我很喜欢。个子很高,服务体验拉满。真正意义上的大蟒蛇,窒息的那种。完事也会一起看看电视 聊聊天。第一次是奔着一火去的,后被强行第二次,导致拖堂。没能想到下位同学是好兄弟椿椿,表示很抱歉。颜值给8分 身材给8分 服务给9分。推荐分8.5分。冲就完了。可无限回锅。
👍2
中 琪琪 被一众老哥说攻克难度较高,看了几个报告,褒贬不一。秉承着实践得出真理。体验下来,硬件很顶,🐻c吧完美极品🐻。是一线天,白虎?批白虎。嫩妹三件套,聊天有回应,就是没下文,性格比较冷的那种,可能帅比去会比我体验好点。 颜值给7分吧,身材给9.5分 相当极品。服务分和推荐分的话不评了。自己可去尝试。服务控不推荐去。夺嫩可去,目前成都遇到的最嫩的嫩妹了。身材好的批爆。
👍3
生活愉快!!!
👍1
8-14 蓠苼 被安利多次的心尖尖系列。十月中旬终于有机会来见见了。熟悉的19楼,进门软糯糯的声音直击心灵,太温柔了。头课环境不错,主要就是想穿干拖鞋。喜欢爱干净的老师,有漱口水。大长腿爱了,忘记拍照,被一众炫耀哥给炫了,后悔没有学习偶像冠希哥的拍照技术。身材比例接近黄金比例,其实可以给满分,扣一分怕老师骄傲。第二次体验成都的水中萧,帮洗完发现老师早已贴心地提前打开了空调,十月的成都还是有点冷的。碰巧有着相同的喜好,聊了好一会儿,被安利了几个不错的小物件后,怕耽搁后面的同学就先溜了。走前也没忘记打卡cdc的著名景点咖啡店。味道属实一般。 ps:御姐气质十足、知性魅力十足。情商拉满,相处舒服。长腿比例完美,腿控福利。🐻b、很软。蛇的很有感情,大蟒蛇。颜值给7.5分、身材给9分、环境头课给9分、推荐分给8.5分。可回锅系列。 @xxxxxLs00
👍12❤6
===== 评论区 ===== 鸭儿哦: 冠希都没有🐍到散了吧 keen(真上岸版): 不蛇瑶 这个名字我不可能白起啊 佬 茧: 苗族风情是不是就是有点黑 比卡 空: 这个位置是在哪儿啊
👍1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @guanxiriji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@guanxiriji named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“冠希日记” (@guanxiriji), 529 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guanxiriji.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.