And finally Tp1 smashed already 194 pips collected easily This is how easily we make this investment possible π₯³π₯³ Crazy returns always

Channel
GTMoFxπ€΄π½(goldtradermo)
@gtmofx_0
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Cite this entry
42,123subscribers
-3,651 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002296431577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gtmofx_0 |
| Description | Gold Trader Mo π π£ daily 4-6 Trading Signals π« No financial advices trade at your own risk! βοΈ @gtmonow |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gtmofx_0 |
Topic
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 06:22 | 42,123 | -779 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 42,902 | -652 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 43,554 | -229 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 43,783 | -227 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 44,010 | -259 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 44,269 | -147 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 44,416 | -161 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 44,577 | -65 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 44,642 | -69 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:52 | 44,711 | -38 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:48 | 44,749 | -47 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 44,796 | -59 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 44,855 | -37 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 44,892 | -38 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 44,930 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 44,947 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 44,983 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 45,026 | -44 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 45,070 | -65 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 45,135 | first reading |
Engagement
486 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 115 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 0.142%
- avg views Γ· 42,123 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 59.7
- 215 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 32.2%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 215
- of 486 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 116 of 215 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 486 (6 August 2026 β 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 12,839 |
| Reactions total | 2,600 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 01:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- β10,900
- Videos
- β159
- Links
- β390
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 6 October 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 37s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
6,565 reactions across 259 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 1,362 | 20.7% | |
| π₯ | 1,311 | 20.0% | |
| π | 1,308 | 19.9% | |
| β€ | 1,303 | 19.8% | |
| π | 1,254 | 19.1% | |
| π | 9 | 0.137% | |
| π€ | 5 | 0.076% | |
| π | 4 | 0.061% | |
| π | 2 | 0.03% | |
| π | 2 | 0.03% | |
| β‘ | 1 | 0.015% | |
| π | 1 | 0.015% | |
| π | 1 | 0.015% | |
| π― | 1 | 0.015% | |
| π€© | 1 | 0.015% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 269 of the 486 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 6,565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 486 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Look at that drop guysπ°π°π°π° Down to earth we goooo I sail we hold and look at us Let's hold
β€10π7π6π4π₯2
Slow and steady we moving guysπΈπΈπΈ Letss drop it nowπ₯³π₯³π₯³π₯³ 100 pips runningπ₯π₯
β€7π7π₯6π5π4
Trade active alreadyβ‘β‘β‘
π12π6β€4π₯4π3
Gold Sell Now: 4143 - 4150 SL: 4153 TP1: 4126 TP2: 4115 TP3: 4100
π8β€7π₯7π4π3
Gold Sell Now
π8π7β€5π₯5π4
Sticker, posted without a caption
π6π6π₯6π6β€5
Trade active alreadyβ‘β‘
π11β€5π5π4π₯4
Gold Buy Now: 4151 - 4143 SL: 4140 TP1: 4164 TP2: 4174 TP3: 4184
π8π7π6π₯6β€2
Gold Buy Slowly
π8π6π₯6π5β€3
Sticker, posted without a caption
π11β€5π₯5π4π4
Setup failed guys Wait for recovery
π8β€7π5π₯5π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 486 posts we hold for @gtmofx_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@gtmofx_0 edited 1 post after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βGTMoFxπ€΄π½(goldtradermo)β (@gtmofx_0), 42,123 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gtmofx_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.