庆祝频道人数10k 给大家发一个红包
👍1

Channel
@gtgtys
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,559subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002153095050 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gtgtys |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gtgtys |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 10,559 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 10,569 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 10,576 | +10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 10,566 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 10,582 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 10,575 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 10,570 | first reading |
63 posts held, back to 8 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 47 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 63 (8 August 2025 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,963 |
| Reactions total | 281 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
627 reactions across 58 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 284 | 45.3% | |
| ❤ | 251 | 40.0% | |
| 🍌 | 15 | 2.39% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 2.39% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 1.91% | |
| 🤓 | 12 | 1.91% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 1.12% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 0.957% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 0.957% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.638% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.478% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.478% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.478% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.319% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.159% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.159% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.159% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.159% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 627reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2025 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
庆祝频道人数10k 给大家发一个红包
👍1
🧧🎉红包发送成功🎉🧧 🔥达利DaLi发送了一个拼手气红包! 💵总金额: 3888 U🪙 🚦剩余: 68/188 🥇 45.68 USDT🪙 - 天天 🥈 34.76 USDT🪙 - 大田 🥉 30.01 USDT🪙 - 王梓慈善家
👍1
🔤🔤🔤🔤黑盒已公益 全网独一家 ⬇️手机号定位 ⬇️支付宝码反 ❄️补齐身份证/手机号 ❄️个人大头 🛡手机号反姓名 🛡v反/Q反三件套 🖥刑侦全户 🖥短信轰炸 📱无违规永久思路 🛰️无违规概率永久思路 新增几个功能:ai脱换衣,破解梯子大全,酒店摄像直播,照片人脸扫描,精准模糊猎魔... 点我进入频道获取卡密 点我进入频道获取卡密
👍3
庆祝频道人数10k 给大家发一个红包
👍4🤔1
⭐️ 恭喜您获得红包资格 ⭐️ 💸已发放 ¥81,652 🔺今日剩余 168 份 ⚙️最新领取 用户***杰 领取188.66 RMB🪙 用户***婷 领取58.80 RMB🪙 用户***豪 领取666.66 RMB🪙 ⏰红包30分钟后失效💤
👍4🤔1
✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 免费开户 千元红包 免费数据号 公益内核 破解美化 免费看篇 八卦吃瓜 抖音热搜…… 🥰点击下方按钮加入即可搜索🥰
👍5
自瞄太离谱了,最后一个人直接行为卡伤了 自瞄会导致模型脱落到时候会修
👍2🤔1
三角洲公益◆算法解密,不嘿嘿内核 更新日志: 1.修复最新闪框加密 2.修复内核绘图字体清晰度 3.修复物资,绘图UI界面功能无法保存 Unicorn纯算法解密,不动内存,通过密钥安全解密 physx模型掩体自瞄漏打,漏那打那,WiFi局域网页雷达共享视野 公益三角洲解密项目,卡密随便输入,已更新至8.14日最新解密,内核级驱动,不协议,不十年,不三十天,稳定得吃,安全性拉满 真正可以稳定的三角洲公益解密内核 不嘿嘿频道: @enennba
👍4❤1🕊1
私端新卡网: https://new.818fka.com/shop/ymsh 月卡不上了因为没人买 月卡联系客服免手续费购买
👍8🕊1
⭐今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! 以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 吴迪公益破解频道 爱玩多内核公益频道 enen内核频道 林羽内核频道 小雪内核频道 光头强工艺内核频道 雪花工艺内核频道 TP工艺内核频道 葫芦娃工艺频道 互推日进3000+用户 参加联系 @wuling7 (本人全网800+频道管理 频道主联系) 参加互推要求:频道10k+日浏览800 ------------------------------------- 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️ 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️ 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️
👍4❤1🕊1
⭐今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! 以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 吴迪公益破解频道 爱玩多内核公益频道 enen内核频道 林羽内核频道 小雪内核频道 光头强工艺内核频道 雪花工艺内核频道 TP工艺内核频道 葫芦娃工艺频道 互推日进3000+用户 参加联系 @wuling7 (本人全网800+频道管理 频道主联系) 参加互推要求:频道10k+日浏览800 ------------------------------------- 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️ 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️ 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️
👍5❤2
✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 免费开户 千元红包 免费数据号 公益内核 破解美化 免费看篇 八卦吃瓜 抖音热搜…… 🥰点击下方按钮加入即可搜索🥰
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @gtgtys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@gtgtys edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
容器授权登录搞哪些?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你们觉得pubgm端口是什么?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2025 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 652,766 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“奇妙冒险屋” (@gtgtys), 10,559 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gtgtys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.