3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 272–274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 09:36
274
+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:47
272
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:32
272
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 14 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
324 reactions across 9 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
119
36.7%
😭
74
22.8%
custom 5301078859855196487
36
11.1%
custom 5220074647076236373
20
6.17%
custom 5235441279852104334
16
4.94%
custom 5222482388562503669
14
4.32%
⚡
10
3.09%
💘
9
2.78%
💔
7
2.16%
🍾
6
1.85%
🔥
4
1.23%
🥰
3
0.926%
😍
2
0.617%
custom 5355306008832933094
1
0.309%
❤🔥
1
0.309%
👍
1
0.309%
👎
1
0.309%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 324reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
40
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 9 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gsgw22. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2025 to 2 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSGW
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Привет и рады вас здесь видеть.
5 июня запускаем сайт и этот канал собирает тех, кто хочет быть рядом с самого начала.
Это будет место для всех, кто живёт манхвой и новеллой.
Что внутри:
▸ чтение глав ▸ живые обсуждения в тредах по каждой серии ▸ общий чат и личные сообщения ▸ коллекционные карты по любимым тайтлам, крафт и обмены между игроками ▸ кастомизируемый профиль и ID-…
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Пишите сюда какие ошибки были замечены в определённых главах. Мелкие буду исправлять сразу же (по типу орфографии, звёздочек там ненужных). Большие буду исправлять после перевода всего тайтла.
Ошибки:
Звание Ли Сон Хэ. Она руководитель, однако где то в начале 170 глав она была указана как командир
178.1 глава
178.2 глава
179.1 глава
179.2 глава
180 глава
181 глава
182 глава
183 глава
184.1 глава
184.2 глава
185.1 глава
185.2 глава
186 глава
187 глава
188 глава
189 глава
190 глава
191 глава
192 глава
193 глава
194 глава
195 глава
196 глава
197 глава
198 глава
199 глава
200 глава
201 глава
202 глава
203 глава
204 глава
205 глава
206 глава
207 глава
208.1 глава
208.2 глава
Прим…
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
всвязи с ограничением по символам в телеграфе (≈ >17 000) какие то главы будут делиться
Часть 1
120 глава
121 глава
122.1 глава
122.2 глава
123 глава
124.1 глава
124.2 глава
125 глава
126 глава
127 глава
128 глава
129 глава
130 глава
131.1 глава
131.2 глава
132.1 глава
132.2 глава
133 глава
134 глава
135.1 глава
135.2 глава
136.1 глава
136.2 глава
137 глава
138 глава
139.1 глава
139.…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @gsgw22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,285,716 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ghost Story” (@gsgw22), 274 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gsgw22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
