Photo, posted without a caption
❤2

Channel
@gs001001
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,798subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002812996054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gs001001 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gs001001 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 10,798 | -11 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 10,809 | -27 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 10,836 | -52 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 10,888 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 10,891 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 10,902 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 10,911 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 10,921 | +26 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 10,895 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:25 | 10,896 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 10,895 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 10,897 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 10,887 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 10,883 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 10,884 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 10,886 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 10,889 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 10,902 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 10,899 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 10,902 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 43 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
160 reactions across 29 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 151 | 94.4% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.13% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.625% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
分享一個近期覺得水準線上的口袋名單 前陣子透過朋友帶路,認識一間低調的高端服務 沒有滿街廣告,也不是那種流水線的約 是走預約制、品質拿得出來的那種 自己親身試過後,比較有感的是 女孩的質感跟照片落差很小 談吐、服務、整體流程都是在水準之上 不會有那種「踩雷」的妥協感 不過老實說,這類型的預算真的會高一階 我自己習慣把預算抓足,圖的是一份安心跟體面 太低價位的品質,說真的也很難給你看得過眼的東西 如果你也是偏好這種「寧缺勿濫」的路線 可以私訊我聊聊,我再跟你說細節 這類型不太適合公開講,免得一堆人跟風🙏 私信管理⬇️ @Miranda_c
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
❤7
IG性感網紅 約炮影片遭男友曝光 #外流 #泡影 #IG系列 #台灣
💓叮叮營業時間:13:00——4:00 單約20k 雙飛36k 左邊恩愛 166.46.C.20歲 右邊七潔 165.45.C.21歲 📱 @dd662d 📱 t210ww ⭐大G:dd666
❤2
台灣老司機外流公射 pinned «訂閱澀澀總站 https://t.me/+XOGhFwsgHOQ0N2U1 是頻道預覽入口 每個頻道的影片都不一樣唷~»
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @gs001001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“台灣老司機外流公射” (@gs001001), 10,798 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gs001001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.