Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

grown-up life confession

@grownuplifecf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,066subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003061971665
TypeChannel
Username@grownuplifecf
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/grownuplifecf

Growth

1,0661,0771,071.57 August 2026 — 1,077 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,077 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,074 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,069 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,066 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,064–1,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:271,066-3
11 Aug 2026, 23:021,069-5
8 Aug 2026, 18:041,074-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:161,077no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:251,077first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.7%
avg views ÷ 1,066 subscribers
Avg views / post
263
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,263
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7354.5%
🤔2014.9%
💔1611.9%
❤‍🔥128.96%
💋53.73%
🍌32.24%
💩10.746%
😱10.746%
🤝10.746%
🤡10.746%
🤮10.746%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC149 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

второе пришествие

7

Signed езориф

6 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤔71

Signed езориф

6 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

чуваки у меня тут в небе какие то вспышки, но на молнию не похоже, звука никакого нет и слишком частые для молнии, подскажите это че за хуйня вообще.. конец света наступил?

6🤝1😱1

Signed езориф

1 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC317 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

анон как встретиться двум челам с украины и россии в нынешней политической ситуации? возможно ли как то попасть в страны друг-друга? посоветуйте самый действенный и дешевый метод, пожалуйста #тейк | @gulcoonf_bot

13❤‍🔥6

Signed езориф

1 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC315 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

надеюсь, такое можно как наконец приучить себя отпускать мне 16, поступил в колледж в другой город. сейчас собираюсь уезжать, поезд уже завтра🤠 я не боюсь покидать дом, и перспектива жить одному меня не пугает, в том городе уже есть знакомые, есть отец, я не останусь без поддержки. я не боюсь самого переезда, но сейчас мне морально тяжело расставаться с прошлой жизнью, с вещами, с воспоминаниями, с чем угодно, нужное

3🍌3❤‍🔥2

Signed езориф

31 Jul 2026, 22:33 UTC237 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ppkc0nf

︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ .︵ ︎ ︎ ︎⏔ 𖫲 𝓸𝓸♡࣫.թ𝕡𝕜🤩𑄝𝕟𝕗 ︎ ︎ ︎ 𝔀𝔀. гдꫀ ᥲктив𝗻𐇽𑄝я кꭷнфа пꪮ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎⏜.︵ ︎ ︎ ︎ ꝕ𑄝𝕡𝕡𝕪 թlᨵy 𝕜𝕚𝕥ɕ𝕙ꫀ𝕟 !? ︎ ︎ 𖠗 𝗻𐇽ᥲviꬶа𝕥iꭷn ︎ ︎ ︎ 𖠗 ꭐ𝕡 թꪮ𝕤𝕥 𝔀𝔀թешениꫀ этꭷму ꝕpk ɕꪮ𝗻𐇽fꫀssiᨵn ! 🔤дꫀɕь вы мꪮжꫀтꫀ пꭷдꫀлитьɕя ɕвꪮим твꭷթчꫀствꪮм ɕвязᥲн𝗻𐇽ым с ппк

2

Signed езориф

31 Jul 2026, 22:25 UTC225 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @typicalpinkteamPhoto

Typical Pink Team (TPT) - команда людей, делящиеся на сферы творчества. Будь то музыка, или рисунок, или анимация. Вместе - мы одна команда. Любой наш интузиаст сможет создать проект, который будет продвигаться нашими участниками команды! Есть проект? Хочешь помочь? Нужны идеи? Присоединяйся в команду! ------------ ВП ПОСТ ------------ Глава команды - @iteractivacc (он/его, можете писать на ты). Пишите по повод

Signed езориф

31 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC168 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @CREEKCANONPhoto

➡️🤩💕 believe in creek supremacy 🤩🥹 💕elcome to... Creek nation🥹🤩 ⸝⸝ 🥹💕ут собрано абсолютно всё, посвященное крикам: викторины, факты, теории, арты и многое другое👍 ⭐️Creek🥹??? (🤩) 💕p post 💕ules 💕dmin list 💕ake bot 💕onor board

Signed езориф

31 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC146 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @choice_confPhoto

_:(´ཀ`」 ∠):_ — КАКОЙ ВЫБРАТЬ ЦВЕТ??...#%@ — ДОШИР@К ИЛИ РОЛТОН ;;??! — ЧТО ЛУЧШЕ * ИЛИ * ¿?;(( ⤿ перед тобой несkолько вариантов и нужно выбрать всего один?(💔 (>_<) если тоже не можешь что-то выбрать... YOU'RE LUCKY! ведь ЭТОТ КФ нацелен на помощь в ВЫБОРЕ АБСОЛЮТНО ВСЕГО😍 | //. . n@vigation (ノ_<。)

Signed езориф

31 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC186 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lifesconfaPhoto

➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖:💜 💜: ϶ᴛᴏ ʍᴇᴄᴛᴏ, ᴦдᴇ ᴧюди дᴇᴧяᴛᴄя ᴄʙᴏиʍи иᴄᴛᴏᴩияʍи, ᴄᴏʙᴇᴛᴀʍи, дᴏᴄᴛижᴇнияʍи. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 поделись своими эмоциями, расскажи, через что ты прошёл, чтобы добиться своего, поделись победой, расскажи о провалах и трудностях, которые тебе пришлось преодолеть, получи поддержку, дай совет тем, кто только в начале пути [полный список можно прочитать тут] 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖:💜 . . -ˋ вп пост (100+)

Signed езориф

29 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC252 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как установить хороший мод ауграм? Я понимаю, звучит аморально, но мне нужно прочитать переписку со своим уже бывшим партнёром, а он удалил чат. Пожалуйста, без обсуждения Неанон Шура. #тейк | @gulcoonf_bot

5

Signed езориф

27 Jul 2026, 23:55 UTC329 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

как избавиться от зависимости от человека если больше года уже не общаетесь полноценно а ты ещё страдаешь 2 раза заканчивали общение по её желанию, в третий раз я проявила инициативу в общении, наладили на пару месяцев смолтоки, но я сама в очень очень легкой грубоватой форме прервала это потому что боялась, что мне опять будет очень больно и плохо, потом ещё с др поздравляла, она проигнорировала, меня в ответ не поз

💔161

Signed езориф

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grownuplifecf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 611,194 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“grown-up life confession” (@grownuplifecf), 1,066 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grownuplifecf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.