Channel
@gromkoshort
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002333932172 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gromkoshort |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gromkoshort |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 32 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 31 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 31 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 January 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 245 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
35 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 57.1% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 37.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Слушай не слова, а трещины между ними — ибо только там, в недосказанном, мы существуем без вины, стыда и страха, — осколки разбитого зеркала, в каждом из которых по-прежнему отражается Бог. @gromkoshort
❤1
Попытка быстро всё “починить” и “решить” в модном бизнес-стиле часто оказывается лишь изящным способом не проживать, не чувствовать и не быть с собой здесь и сейчас, потому что человек - не робот, а жизнь -не список задач, а тёмная река бессознательного, текущая сквозь время, тело, любовь и эпоху, данную нам свыше. @gromkoshort
👍1
Ирония эпохи осознанности: женщины уходят от мужчин, которые «не работают над собой», не замечая, как самые проработанные мужчины по той же причине уходят от них. @gromkoshort
👍1
Моя жизнь формируется не количеством умных слов и не изящными способами бегства от тревоги, а тем, насколько я способен погрузиться в неё всем нутром — в радости и тоске, в любви и боли, оставаясь единым с миром без брони избыточной рефлексии, но сохраняя взгляд за пределы сцены, на которой Бог ставит свой странный спектакль; в этом, кажется, и есть искусство глубокого и зрелого бытия. @gromkoshort
👍2🤣1
Настоящие мы рождаемся не в словах и даже не в поступках, а в зазорах — в ошибках, оговорках, потерянных вещах, странных и вещих снах, в той секунде, когда актёр на сцене, уже сменивший маску и почти идеально вошедший в роль, вдруг забывает текст, выпадает из пьесы и ловит взгляд случайного зрителя — хотя, возможно, именно он всё это время и был единственным, кто действительно смотрел. @gromkoshort
❤4
Мы ищем Другого, чтобы стать больше себя, боимся его инаковости, мечтаем о свободе и пугаемся её ответственности — и потому единственный выход в третьем пути: создать такое пространство любви, где близость не отменяет свободу, а свобода не разрушает любовь. @gromkoshort
❤2
Культ жертвы в современном мире, где каждый считает себя жертвой истории, мужчин, женщин, государства, капитализма, технологий, патриархата, большинства, меньшинств и ещё чёрт знает чего, на самом деле часто оказывается скрытой формой агрессии, спрятанной под маской “хорошести” и моральной правоты, — и в этом вся суть невроза: не будучи осознанным и переработанным, он требует всё больше жалости к себе любимому. @gro…
👍1🔥1
Наши желания никогда не принадлежат нам до конца - они всегда рождаются в поле Другого, поэтому наш успех в работе, отношениях и жизни зависит от того, кем мы себя окружаем: рядом с теми, кто сам не реализован, мы неизбежно беднеем, а рядом с теми, кто состоялся - в бизнесе, любви, семье и даже духовной жизни, - начинаем расти сами. @gromkoshort
❤3
Главная иллюзия современности - думать, что наши конфликты решаются торжеством одной силы над другой, тогда как подлинное разрешение требует третьего пути: взгляда сверху, где раскол перестаёт быть противоборством и становится материалом для нового осмысления жизни и бытия. @gromkoshort
Через жизнь Бог показывает нам спектакль: мы можем остаться зрителями или выйти на сцену - выбор всегда за нами. @gromkoshort
👍3
Обман - самый короткий путь к одиночеству: обманывая других, мы разрушаем, прежде всего, внутреннюю связь с ними и в итоге остаёмся с болью покинутости. @gromkoshort
👍1
Наивность - высшая форма зла: это отказ видеть реальность и собственную тьму, позволяющий верить, что мир хорош лишь потому, что я не допускаю мысли о своём зле. @gromkoshort
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gromkoshort. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 412,229 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Громко и коротко” (@gromkoshort), 32 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gromkoshort.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.