10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,265–40,404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:24
40,281
-14
13 Aug 2026, 13:26
40,295
-16
12 Aug 2026, 13:13
40,311
-14
11 Aug 2026, 11:13
40,325
-12
10 Aug 2026, 11:48
40,337
-27
9 Aug 2026, 10:08
40,364
-14
8 Aug 2026, 07:42
40,378
-8
7 Aug 2026, 09:06
40,386
-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:30
40,388
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:29
40,388
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 40,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,690
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
20 (4 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
193,740
Reactions total
7,676
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 01:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,680
Videos
≈586
Links
≈155
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,676 reactions across 20 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,039
52.6%
🔥
880
11.5%
❤🔥
649
8.45%
😍
393
5.12%
🤣
387
5.04%
💯
246
3.20%
👍
172
2.24%
🤡
145
1.89%
🙏
142
1.85%
💔
140
1.82%
💘
83
1.08%
😭
50
0.651%
🕊
45
0.586%
🗿
36
0.469%
👌
33
0.43%
😁
29
0.378%
💅
26
0.339%
🥰
20
0.261%
🤯
18
0.234%
🤝
16
0.208%
19 further kinds
127
1.65%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,676reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grinulya20. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Где-то полгода назад у меня вышел пост про мои расходы. Он хорошо залетел, мы
все эту тему пообсуждали и забыли.
К слову, надо отметить, что траты для Москвы и 2026 года у меня абсолютно обычные и всё рамках разумного без излишеств.
Но! Какой-то ущемленный мужчина (конечно, кто же ещё)))) решил это обсудить на всеобщее обозрение с
такими же ущемленцами.
Опустим то, что мне приписали сделанные сиськи и обвинили в т…
Ещё несколько таких отзывов в моём и директе @laconic_ru и я подниму цены ….🤣
Храни Боже мой блог, который даёт мне возможность экономить на рекламе и ставить такие цены
7 лет нашим штампам)) И мне СОВСЕМ в это не верится!!
По моим ощущениям это было
в другой жизни, как будто лет
20 прошло минимум. Как долго тянется время! И как много с этой даты произошло всего, даже в голове не укладывается!!!
Мы расписались 14.08 вдвоём, никого совсем не звали, и 14.09 сыграли свадьбу на 100 человек.
Это было лучшим решением! И ни одно путешествие вообще не стояло рядом со свадьбой!!! Я очень р…
На днях с бабушкой обсуждали разницу в наших поколениях и она делилась тем, что было в порядке вещей в её молодости и примерно до моих лет 10.
Я очень рада, что живу конкретно сейчас. Думаю, что если бы мои текущие взгляды могли бы сформи роваться каким-то образом, будь я рождена в ~1950-1970ых, то меня бы общество на корню задавило, как и весь мой круг общения.
Хотя, моя бабушка отличный пример тому, что и тогда б…
Через месяц улетаем в Китай отмечать ДР мелких🤌🏻🇨🇳
Уже активно собираемся, я немного в ауте, так как работы просто тьма,
на сентябрь выпадает большой запуск + 2 недели в Китае + отпуск всей команды Лаконик в Африке🥲👹🤣
Словила небольшую паничку, когда представила наши походы
в Юниверсал и Диснейленд. Для этих целей планирую повесить
на детей эиртеги.
Посмотрела миллиард обзоров,
в упор не понимаю как туда люди ездя…
Обсудим сны и кошмары?… 💤👹
Я - тот самый человек, который видит сны ежедневно без исключения и очень это дело любит.
Плюс моего мозга: перед тем как уснуть, я могу в голове прокрутить желаемое и это мне с большой вероятностью приснится. Этот скилл мне удалось натренировать. Это шикарно просто!
Мои сны делятся на 4 категории:
1. Лютая наркомания, сочетающая в себе все события за день / неделю / месяц и имеющая оче…
Такую имбу нашла в директе. Платье стоит 13.000₽.
Тем временем наши цены остались на уровне 2022-2023 годов, а что то вообще на уровне 2020. При том, что себестоимость выросла в разы. Охуеваю, когда такое читаю.
Миллиардеры, налетайте!🤌🏻
Как слезть с иглы Дринкита?…
Я в шоке с того как они захватили рынок. Еще год назад мы с Миленой шли в Серф и, увидев какую-то синюю вывеску, подумали - что это вообще такое?
Вообще ни разу не реклама, но ради интереса просматривала их бух отчёты
и прибыль за 6 лет с 3.5 млн выросла до 100+.
Мне кажется абсолютно гениальным этот формат, когда ВООБЩЕ НИ С КЕМ не надо общаться, ждать официанта, меню, а потом ждать е…
Сделала гид по нашей большой и красивой стране🩷
Больше 20 направлений для путешествий с указанием самых топовых локаций!
Сохраняйте, чтобы не потерять!
Добавляйте туда в комментарии свои рекомендации, будет мега полезный пост!)
П.С. Надеюсь, наш вишлист мы сможем осуществить в ближайшие годы😍
Запускаем на днях коктейльно-вечернюю коллекцию 🩷
Оптимизировали расходы, сделав из одной ткани сразу 2 модели🤌🏻
5 цветов: черный, айвори / шампань (зависит от освещения), бордо, оливка, нежно розовый.
Плотная ткань, не просвечивает и не подчеркивает то, что не нужно)) У каждого платья подклад, лямки с регуляторами и молнии. Кейп и
футляр - 2 отдельные позиции, продаются в комплекте.
Безумно довольна нашей работо…
❤🔥181❤55🔥44🥰14😍14💔4🦄4🌭3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grinulya20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дневник путешественницы @kseniamellie · 148,686 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
Карина Палецких @lifekarina · 257,213 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
МАША.СТОРИЗ @mashastories1 · 120,646 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
MMARGO @mmargosavchuk · 121,627 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Даша Козловская @dashakozlouskayatg · 137,662 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grinulya” (@grinulya20), 40,281 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grinulya20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.