Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

À tort ou à raison

@greveillimitee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

428subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002181489955
TypeChannel
Username@greveillimitee
Created20 June 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/greveillimitee

Growth

428429428.57 August 2026 — 429 subscribers8 August 2026 — 429 subscribers14 August 2026 — 428 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 428–429 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:37428-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:19429no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:56429first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

414 reactions across 17 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁10224.6%
👍8921.5%
🔥297.00%
🍾286.76%
245.80%
🤡225.31%
🤔204.83%
🏆143.38%
🎅112.66%
😢102.42%
🥰102.42%
🤣71.69%
51.21%
❤‍🔥51.21%
👎51.21%
💯40.966%
😨40.966%
🥴40.966%
20.483%
🎄20.483%
14 further kinds174.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2024 to 7 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jan 2025, 16:38 UTC≈1,340 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😁9👍1

Signed Ян Веселов

7 Jan 2025, 12:13 UTC≈1,490 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

(вот и помер дед Ле Пен)

🏆14😢6👍5😨4🤷2🍌1🎉1👎1

Signed Joe Kenehan

7 Jan 2025, 12:12 UTC≈1,340 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

о, и ещё одна!

🍾15👎2😢2😭2👻1🖕1🤔1😱1

Signed Joe Kenehan

5 Dec 2024, 05:51 UTC≈1,730 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ну хоть где-то хорошие новости.

🍾13🔥4🤡2🤔1

Signed Joe Kenehan

2 Dec 2024, 15:14 UTC≈1,570 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вообще я хотел тут зафиксировать такую мысль. "Национальное объединение проголосует против правительства! ... если только не случится чуда в последний момент" ... сказал Барделла, не мамаша Марин. Так что есть вероятность кокетства и одному богу известных закулисных манёвров между фашами и макронистами. Но я всё же ставлю на отставку кабмина. Логика Меланшона. Подписаться

🥰9🤔5🥴32

Signed Joe Kenehan

2 Dec 2024, 15:07 UTC≈1,340 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

(видимо, правительство выкинут на мороз наконец, и всё начнётся по новой; в целом реализуется мой прогноз пока, так что писать на самом деле НЕЧЕГО)

🎅115🎄2🫡1😁1

Signed Joe Kenehan

2 Dec 2024, 15:05 UTC≈1,140 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

давай давай давай давай

🔥11💩1🥴1🫡1

Signed Joe Kenehan

11 Jul 2024, 05:10 UTC≈2,210 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И #опрос ИФОП на закуску. 59% французов недовольны результатом выборов. Топ-5 премьер-министров согласно французской публике: Дарманан (нынешнее МВД), Глюксман (правый социалист), Рюфан, Бертран, Олланд. Топ очень условный: если треть населения кого-то любит, две трети этого же человека не любит. Так вот разделилось французское общество на три части. Поляризация+! #вокабулярий bon - хорёщо mal - плёхо très - очен p

😁14👍4💯3🔥1

Signed Joe Kenehan

11 Jul 2024, 05:04 UTC≈1,580 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

По сути новостей никаких пока нет: Макрон хочет "большинства друзей республики" (без ННФ и НО), часть макронистов хочет коалиции конкретно с голлистами, часть поменьше не против коалиции с социалистами, голлисты важно раздувают щёки, ННФ — тоже, но всё-таки пообоснованнее, в Национальном объединении переполох и кадровые перестановки: мамка раздаёт подзатыльники за "проигранные" выборы. Всё смешалось в доме Облонских,

😁12👍8🤡4🤔3😢1

Signed Joe Kenehan

9 Jul 2024, 14:59 UTC≈1,340 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

О, наконец-то я увидел хорошую разбивку Национального собрания и по электоральным блокам, и по политическим партиям! В клёвом "конструкторе коалиций" от "Монд". Тоже вчера всплывало на стриме, мол, сколько у кого конкретно? А вот.

👍20

Signed Joe Kenehan

9 Jul 2024, 14:06 UTC≈1,280 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Фор сказал, что готов быть премьер-министром от имени Нового народного фронта. Видимо, предварительная договорённость за эти два дня между шефами партий достигнута. Уже прошёл почти час, но никто из сотоварищей Фора по блоку не выступил с осуждением его заявления, так что... Но будем следить. Формально свою кандидатуру Фор при поддержке ННФ планирует выдвинуть в течение нескольких дней (сейчас Макрон, который назнача

🔥12🤔7👍1

Signed Joe Kenehan

9 Jul 2024, 10:59 UTC984 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хорошая инфографика в Bloomberg: 1. Распределение мест в Национальном собрании. Можно отдельно посмотреть кто победил, долю голосов, кто получил второе место и снимался ли кто-то перед вторым туром; 2. Левые и макронисты лучше выступили на западе и в крупных округах, а националисты - на востоке, особенно, бывших шахтерских районах северо-востока, а также сельских районах; 3. Только 76 гонок завершились сразу в пе

👍172👌1🔥1

Signed Ян Веселов

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @greveillimitee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“À tort ou à raison” (@greveillimitee), 428 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greveillimitee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.