Channel
@greendale2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16,936subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002824987513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @greendale2 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/greendale2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 16,936 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 16,938 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 16,942 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 16,945 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 16,947 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 16,949 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 16,950 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10 | 83.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello Everyone, First and foremost, we want to sincerely apologize for missing our initial launch window. We know how excited you all are, and we deeply regret the delay. Here is where things stand: The game is 100% finished and completely ready for release. While our initial NFT presale didn't raise as much capital as anticipated, we didn't let that stop us. Our team has been entirely self-funding development out…
Channel photo updated
Hey Farmers! We know many of you are eager to start your journey in Greendale. While we aimed to launch this month, we’ve decided to take just a little more time to ensure the experience is perfect. Our developers are currently putting the finishing touches on our Sui integration, ensuring a seamless multi-chain experience. Because Greendale is a long-term project, we refuse to cut corners on quality. The n…
❤1
Channel photo updated
Hello Farmers! 🌾 As we approach our official launch, we want to address the most frequent question in our community: "Where are the tokenomics?" In Web3, many projects fail because they launch a "hype token" before they have a working game. Greendale is doing things differently. We are a Product-First project. Here is our strategic plan for a sustainable economy: 🎮 1. Why the Game (and Solana) comes first? To ens…
🔥4
Thank you for your continued support and patience as we reach this next milestone in our development. Following our successful launch on Solana, we are excited to announce the next phase of our journey: multi-chain integration. We believe our community should lead our direction. We invite you to cast your vote on our official Telegram channel to decide which network we should integrate next. Your options are: Ba…
❤1
🚜 Greendale Update: The Wait is Almost Over! A massive thank you to our community. Your patience during this quiet development phase has been incredible. We’ve been working tirelessly behind the scenes to ensure the relaunch is smooth, profitable, and—most importantly—fun for everyone. 💎 To our Greendale Pass Holders: A special shout-out to those who minted the Greendale Pass. Your loyalty is the foundation o…
🔥6
A lot of people are waiting for the game to launch before they mint. That's fine, but you're confusing a PFP with a Utility Pass. We're 68% finished with the game right now. The current mint price is for those who get in before it's 100% finished. When the game is live, you won't be minting. You'll be buying this pass from today's minters on the secondary market. Your choice. MINT NOW: https://launchmynft.io/sol/21…
Dev update: We've hit 68% completion on the mainnet build. We know you're asking for a date, but we're strategic. We will not launch our "Play-and-Own" economy just to watch it fail in a deep bear market. Our focus is on long-term value, not a rushed, failed launch. We build. #Greendale #PlayAndOwn ENGAGE: https://x.com/greendalegame/status/1989287073124127214?s=20
It seems we need to clarify something. Thinking Greendale Mainnet will only have 500 players is a huge misunderstanding. The game will be open to all. Those 500 Public Passes (and all others minted) are for the people who want to own the economy, not just play in it. Pass holders will get priority access and benefits we aren't even ready to announce yet. You'll see. ENGAGAE: https://x.com/greendalegame/status/198928…
🔥 The Public Sale is moving. The 500 Farmer Passes in this round are already almost 40% SOLD OUT. This is your last chance to mint a pass directly. Once they're gone, the only way in is the secondary market. Don't be late. Secure your lifetime pass NOW. 🧑🌾 Mint Here:: https://www.launchmynft.io/collections/GabgzjB3153f6ckzijp37mvyYJ4LjVJ1iq4d4kg1xYD5/v6oRCp7WRTNUcvdupLJs
Keep underestimating us. We're busy building a game that's actually different from the rest. Greendale is going to surprise a lot of people. Very soon. #GameFi #Solana #PlayAndOwn ENGAGE: https://x.com/greendalegame/status/1987864479795957946?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @greendale2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 517,713 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@greendale2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Greendale Game Announcement Official” (@greendale2), 16,936 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greendale2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.