Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Массаракш наизнанку

@green_hedgehog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,591subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001059206974
TypeChannel
Username@green_hedgehog
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/green_hedgehog

Growth

1,5901,5911,590.56 August 2026 — 1,590 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,590 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,591 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,590–1,591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:281,591+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:081,590no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:011,590first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held20 (31 December 202520 July 2026)
Views total
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

674 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15122.4%
👍14721.8%
10916.2%
😢487.12%
🎄324.75%
🤯304.45%
😭284.15%
👏233.41%
💔172.52%
😁101.48%
🐳91.34%
😱91.34%
🥰91.34%
81.19%
😨71.04%
🤔71.04%
👀60.89%
🕊40.593%
🙈40.593%
❤‍🔥30.445%
6 further kinds131.93%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 674reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
118
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
83
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @green_hedgehog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,350 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Да, что-то мрачновато у нас тут. Давайте лучше отправимся в Индию. Страну фестивалей, религий и прочих каст. Огромное население, расслоение по кастам, религиям и языкам. Страна «огромных чисел». И вот, кстати, давайте обсудим, как там в прошлом году прошел...

🔥149😱4🙈3🐳2

4 May 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,210 views37 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

История, что на войне убивают только пули, снаряды и прочие взрывы — она очень живуча. Но вот вам еще одна история о том, как война убивает исподволь, просто фактом своего существования. Когда есть куча причин, но виноватых в них — не найти. Потому что... к кому обращаться, что вода мокрая, E=mc², а молекулы делятся вот таким вот образом. Короче, при чем тут поезда, регламенты и откуда взялся...

😢128🔥6💔42❤‍🔥2👍2😱1

10 Apr 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,290 views31 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

А ну и что, что поздно! Зато второй раз за неделю! Вот вам еще одна история про все хорошее. На этот раз — история операции «Мельница», которую советская контрразведка использовала, чтобы защищать интересы страны. И надо сказать — у них действительно хорошо это получалось. Короче, в пятницу для вас...

11🤯10👀6🤬2🔥1😭1

8 Apr 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,090 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ладно, я опять пропустил день. Не получается у меня быть постоянным... А знаете, что оказывается было довольно постоянным во Второй мировой войне? Вы не за что не догадаетесь, но объединение немцев и американцев против СС в конце войны. Или абсурд на войне. Я об этом уже писал, но внезапно, был еще один подобный случай и был он...

🔥126👍4

3 Apr 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,170 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну, ничего себе, я выхожу прямо на прежний режим. Вот вам третья история за неделю. И на этот раз — довольно известная. Но вдруг, кто не знает о «путешествии проклятых» и о том, что происходит в случае...

🔥1810😢8🐳3👍2🤯1

1 Apr 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,050 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я тут решил попробовать еще одну Иишку для создания картинок. И она меня похоже немного располнила. Вы тоже видите этого толстого ёжика? Кстати, если что, я этот пост еще и в Сабстак попробую продублировать. Будет пробой пера. Короче, я это к чему — пусть первого апреля у нас будет загадочная статья, с загадочной иллюстрацией и таинственным названием. Ведь речь в ней пойдет о чем-то странном. Том, чего по логике быть

👍10🥰7🔥61

30 Mar 2026, 15:10 UTC983 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Да, один пост в две недели — это как-то не очень. Сам понимаю. Но, весна, метаморфозы, отсутствие смысла жизни, все тлен. И вот вам история в тему. Казалось бы — есть всем известная корпорация. Много всяких полезных и вкусных товаров производит. Но, мне же мало, что за мной канадцы охотятся и Ватикан. Вот причина для того, чтобы еще и Nestle за мной пришла. Короче, история того, как...

👍24🔥52👏2😱1

13 Mar 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,230 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот вы такие: воу! А, шутка уже не работает, да? Ну ок. В общем, помните, не так давно доллар неплохо так обновился по дизайну. Ну, все простые смертные об этом поволновались и забыли. А вот те, кто в курсе происходящего знали, что это не так просто получилось. И вот сейчас, вы тоже будете в курсе и узнаете...

👍225👏3🔥1

11 Mar 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,150 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот вы такие: воу! Новое оповещение! Наверняка новая статья. А здесь... О! И правда новая статья. Давно уже пора, а то я что-то расслабился. И на этот раз — странная история о том, как легко из мелкого и незаметного существа превратиться в желанный многими символ. А так же о том, почему не стоит завидовать ортолану и как вообще живет...

👍16😭8💔42🔥1🙈1

3 Mar 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,320 views16 reactions83 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот вы такие: воу! Новое оповещение! Наверняка новая статья. А здесь... Ну да, опять я, опять смотрю на вас грустными глазами и говорю: «Дяденька (тетенька), подайте на золотую статую меня в полный рост, для закрытия гештальта вызванного детской травмой и ощущением ненужности». Неужели вы сможете устоять против такого предложения? А я вам потом еще каких-нибудь странных штук найду в сети... Если эта мордаха, честно

👏11😍32

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @green_hedgehog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,184,837 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Массаракш наизнанку” (@green_hedgehog), 1,591 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/green_hedgehog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.