Channel
@greed_mode
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,293subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001610578900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @greed_mode |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/greed_mode |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 1,293 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 1,295 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 1,298 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1,301 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 1,301 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
262 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 137 | 52.3% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 12.6% | |
| 🤣 | 27 | 10.3% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 6.87% | |
| 🤡 | 18 | 6.87% | |
| 😐 | 9 | 3.44% | |
| custom 5192754652164140931 | 7 | 2.67% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 1.53% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.763% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.382% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2025 to 19 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @greed_mode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2025 to 19 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Линея вышла, скоро выйдет Метамаск, давайте думать в какой следующий дроп будем верить. Так как полимаркет уже давал намёки на реварды, давайте найдём большой проект, который вообще не говорил о своём токене. Я предлагаю Phantom😈
😁11💩2
Linea Всё Так ну что давайте сделаем выводы по-моему любимому проекту. Лично у меня большинство акков живы и большинство софтовые после денкана. Использую Linea Fee checker + вспоминаю в уме стоимость куса индусов (для POH) и примерная стоимость моего аккаунта равняется 20$. Акки конечно прогревались и не простыми активностями, а любимыми свапами в Метамаске, а значит получили +20% буст к дропу (статья с бустами…
👍16❤3👎3💩2🤡2
Video, posted without a caption
Gaia ещё 10 лямов сверху! Gaia привлекли ещё $10 миллионов(всего 20) благодаря ведущим инвесторам ByteTrade/SIG, Mirana/Mantle, а также партнёрам-визионерам, включая Outlier Ventures, NGC, Taisu Ventures, Consensys Mesh. 💵 На что пойдут $20M💵 📌Запуск мобильного AI с локальной инференцией 📌Масштабирование нод и инструментов 📌Поддержка open-source LLM и агентных фреймворков 📌Кроссчейн-интеграции и DAO Gaia созда…
👍8
Вчера познакомился с челом что уже вынес 20к$ с Kaito Парень очень простой и открытый, помог мне с парочкой вопросов, за это ему отдельный +REP. Он кстати тоже ведет свой блог @oceans_review но чисто для души и как дневник. Он кстати еще сделал х11 на Composables и Monsters Fun сминтил 0.125 ETH —> продал за 0.7 ETH Чисто андерадар канал, сказал, что скоро еще дропнет статью по Kaito 😺
🤣24👍3😢1
Gaianet Последний заезд и последняя гонка. Так ну что, давно не было новостей о моём любимом проекте, поэтому вот они, как вы просили-новости. Новая Galxe-компания, где нужно пройти квиз и принять участие в розыгрыше 3,000 USDT + EP (Gaia Points). Дедлайн компании уже 14 июля, так что поторопитесь. Советую забрать дискорд роли, проверить работоспособность нод, ведь форсаж возможно закончится.
❤5
Самый лучший проект в мире начинает полёт, чтобы раздать 🪂🪂🪂
😁28custom 51927546521641409311
Sahara Чекер Здесь можете проверить количество токенов - https://knowledgedrop.saharaai.com/ Аккаунт с демигодом в первом сезоне получил 2600 токенов или 1200 токенов на TGE + x2 на сейле Buildpad с гарант аллоки. Аккаунт в Sahara Legend, который фармил с самого начала компании - получил 210 токенов или 100 токенов на TGE Вместе с OKX промкой получилось 300 баксов для жирных и 45 баксов для софтовых акков по цене …
😁12🤡5🤣3
This summer https://www.monad.foundation/
🤡8custom 51927546521641409313😱2😁1
Мне всегда было смешно, люди которые минтят НФТ и ждут иксов. Хули вам мало флипнуть по быренькому с профитом 10-30 долларов и все? это 2000 рублей
😁24🤡3
Ладно, даже отдельно написали, что это всё фэк и вам нужно только эфирчик на клейм для газа ГАЗ ГАЗ
👍4custom 51927546521641409313❤2😱1
Готовы держать 300 баксов на всех фермерских кошелях для следующих дропов? Например Монада
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @greed_mode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 889,219 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Laurus(темки больше 100$)” (@greed_mode), 1,293 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greed_mode.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.