Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Gravity Field | AI Персонализация

@gravityfield_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002157514505
TypeChannel
Username@gravityfield_official
DescriptionРассказываем про омниканальный рост e-commerce на данных с помощью ИИ, Персонализации, Ассистентов Продуктовые анонсы и новости Gravity Field #ИИАссистенты #Персонализация #Mobile #РитейлМедиа #ИИПоиск https://gravityfield.ai/
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/gravityfield_official

Growth

1107 August 2026 — 110 subscribers9 August 2026 — 110 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109–111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:17110no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:06110first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 24 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
93.3%
avg views ÷ 110 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held15 (24 April 202630 July 2026)
Views total308
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
66
Videos
6
Links
56

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5139.5%
👍4837.2%
129.30%
53.88%
🥰53.88%
👀32.33%
👌32.33%
👏10.775%
👾10.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gravityfield_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC73 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Теперь Gravity Field можно подключить к AI-агенту Запустили Gravity Docs MCP. С ним можно попросить агента: — подключить Gravity Field к вашему сайту или приложению; — помочь собрать сложную аудиторию; — разобраться в результатах A/B-теста; — предложить сценарии для роста среднего чека; — пошагово объяснить настройку кампаний и рекомендаций. Подключение занимает пару минут, авторизация не требуется 🚀 { "mcpSe

👍6🔥31👀1

21 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC160 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Бум! 💥 Запустили RecSys Studio — теперь через Gravity Field можно подключить собственный рекомендательный алгоритм и проверить, как он влияет на заказы и выручку. Продуктовое название у фичи до недавнего времени было другое — BYOA (Bring Your Own Algorithm). По аналогии с вечеринками BYOB (Bring Your Own Beer): приходите со своим алгоритмом, инфраструктура — с нас. Название неплохое, но попробуйте произнести «би-ва

🔥85👍4

15 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC75 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Ускорили публикацию кампаний Раньше после публикации кампания могла появиться на сайте только через час. Это было особенно неудобно, когда нужно было запустить промо к определённому времени или быстро исправить ошибку. Теперь кампания появляется на сайте в течение 5 секунд. Можно опубликовать изменения и сразу проверить результат.

🔥8

13 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC330 views7 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Спасут ли кнопки конверсию? Каждый год нам твердят: «Скруглите углы — получите +55% кликов». Эти UX советы становятся догмами, но работают ли они на практике? Международная группа во главе с Роном Кохави решила проверить это на живых данных. Вместе с Андреем Андреевым (METRO) они запустили А/В тест на платформе Gravity Field. Читайте, как проходил эксперимент и чему стоит верить, а чему — нет, в нашей статье "К

4👍2👏1

9 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC96 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Придумали квиз, подборщик или промо-игру? Соберите и запустите ее прямо в Gravity Field Скоро релизим AI Experience Builder — AI-помощника для создания интерактивных e-commerce механик. С ним можно быстрее превратить идею в рабочий сценарий на сайте: 🛍 подборщик товаров 🧩 квиз 💬 опрос 🎁 промо-механику 🎮 мини-игру ⚡️ кастомный интерактивный виджет Работает просто: описываешь, какую механику хочешь получить, а AI со

🔥81👍1

7 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC103 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Продолжаем тему товарных рекомендаций. Недавно мы обсуждали варианты дизайна рекомендательных полок, а теперь предлагаем обсудить заголовки рекомендаций. ✍️ Ведь хороший нейминг может стать частью стиля бренда: дружелюбный, провокационный или деловой, решать Вам. Мы собрали 25 идей заголовков для рекомендательных виджетов Интернет магазина 📚 Читайте подробнее в статье

🔥4

3 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC104 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Запустили новый раздел для Shopping Assistant — «Обзор диалогов». Это отчет для команд, которые развивают ассистента и хотят понимать, как он используется в реальном пользовательском пути. В разделе можно увидеть: - сколько пользователей обращается к ассистенту и какой сейчас объем аудитории; - как меняется динамика диалогов и сообщений после изменений в сценариях, промптах, интерфейсе или точках входа; - на каких

🔥6

26 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC345 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Любите ли вы товарные рекомендации как любим их мы? ❤️ Собрали для Вас 15 идей дизайна рекомендательных виджетов для интернет-магазина: персональные рекомендации, хиты продаж, с этим товаром покупают, похожие товары и многое другое. Внутри варианты для разных сценариев: главная страница, каталог, карточка товара, корзина, мобильный интерфейс, промо-механики и повторные покупки. Читайте и вдохновляйтесь

👍6🔥3🥰3

16 Jun 2026, 15:13 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Большинство интернет-магазинов уже собирают огромные объемы данных о своих клиентах. Но проблема не в количестве данных. Проблема в том, что данные о покупках, поведении на сайте, активности в приложении и маркетинговых коммуникациях часто существуют отдельно друг от друга. В результате персонализация остается фрагментированной, а бизнес теряет выручку и возможности для роста LTV. Разобрали, как CDP помогает объеди

👍4👌3

5 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC118 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Яндекс Маркет, Лавка, Lamoda, Wildberries, Авито — крупнейшие игроки российского eCommerce уже запускают ИИ-ассистентов для покупателей. Но дело не только в подборе товаров. На наших глазах формируется новый интерфейс покупок: единое окно, где пользователь может выбрать товар, сравнить варианты, получить консультацию, уточнить доставку и решить другие вопросы без переходов между десятками разделов сайта. Разобрали

👍4🔥4👀2

15 May 2026, 08:01 UTC483 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Собрали для вас 28 идей как подсветить промо акции в Интернет магазине! 🔥 Усиливаем маркетинговый эффект от специальных акций и распродаж. В статье креативы от коллег из Яндекс Лавки, Перекрестка, Петровича, Диван.ру, КуулКлевер, Sokolov, ЗооЗавр, Hoff, DNS, ВкусВилл, ВсеИнструменты, Lamoda, Золотое Яблоко и многих других. Читайте статью, вдохновляйтесь и запускайте новые кампании.

4👍3

12 May 2026, 08:00 UTC170 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Запустили бета-тест нового личного кабинета Gravity Field. Новый интерфейс уже доступен по ссылке: https://beta.app.gravityfield.ai/ Войти можно с тем же логином, что и в основном кабинете. Бета-тест продлится до 12 июня. После этого полностью переедем на новый дизайн, а старый интерфейс отключим. Почему бета, а не сразу переезд? Потому что личный кабинет — рабочий инструмент, в котором команды каждый день запуск

👍6🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @gravityfield_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 492,634 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gravity Field | AI Персонализация” (@gravityfield_official), 110 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gravityfield_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.