22 measurements spanning 24 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,775–12,862 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 05:37
12,788
+3
29 Aug 2026, 02:58
12,785
-2
28 Aug 2026, 05:46
12,787
-2
27 Aug 2026, 04:45
12,789
-3
26 Aug 2026, 06:38
12,792
-2
25 Aug 2026, 04:46
12,794
-4
24 Aug 2026, 00:46
12,798
-2
22 Aug 2026, 10:58
12,800
-2
21 Aug 2026, 01:06
12,802
-2
19 Aug 2026, 23:51
12,804
+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:53
12,803
-3
16 Aug 2026, 20:23
12,806
-5
15 Aug 2026, 10:19
12,811
-4
13 Aug 2026, 23:37
12,815
-2
12 Aug 2026, 20:13
12,817
-2
11 Aug 2026, 22:22
12,819
-6
11 Aug 2026, 00:41
12,825
-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:41
12,827
-4
9 Aug 2026, 02:01
12,831
-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:00
12,835
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.5%
avg views ÷ 12,788 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,410
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
24 (8 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
30,890
Reactions total
392
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
318
Videos
122
Links
376
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4h 48m
Average length
57m 42s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,080 reactions across 24 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,104
35.8%
🔥
838
27.2%
👍
493
16.0%
💯
190
6.17%
🙏
165
5.36%
🤔
124
4.03%
⚡
38
1.23%
🥰
28
0.909%
😢
24
0.779%
😨
13
0.422%
🤣
13
0.422%
👀
9
0.292%
😇
9
0.292%
🤝
8
0.26%
🤗
6
0.195%
😁
5
0.162%
🤯
5
0.162%
✍
4
0.13%
😱
3
0.097%
🖕
1
0.032%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,080reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, озвучиваю стоимость диагностик сюда, чтобы сразу было понятно записываться или нет, просто много людей пишет и я каждому отвечаю, легче сюда написать. Чтобы сэкономить всем нам время:
Диагностика по здоровью короткая( в которую входит еще плюсом и диагностика чакр, меридианов, сущности, оборудование, состояние ауры и так далее)- 4500 руб.
Расширенная по здоровью- 6600 руб.
Диагностика «Звездная генетика», в …
Всем добрый день! В этом месяце у меня есть немного мест на диагностики, кто хотел пройти диагностики пишите в личку, запишу Вас. Напоминаю ссылку на мой профиль- https://t.me/MiraSolaris
Друзья, выкладываю ссылки на свои курсы, кто у меня отучился в этом месяце можете пока приобрести эти курсы и в ближайшее время буду делать продолжение курса "Тайны Света", выложу ссылку чуть позже. Ссылки на приобретение курсов обучения:
Мер-Ка-Ба Божественного существа- https://granivechnosti.lpxl.ru/merkaba
Арасатма 1 уровень- https://granivechnosti.lpxl.ru/arasatma1
Арасатма 2уровень- https://granivechnosti.lpx…
Но снова пришёл момент о котором я уже успела забыть. Ту трубку, тот канатик, который связывал меня с телом человека вдруг отрезали. Стало невыносимо трудно дышать. Мне стало страшно, снова страшно. Этот день для меня был трагическим. И я подумала:
«Нужно что-то делать, нужно позвать на помощь!».
- Помогите! Помогите! Мне очень трудно дышать! Я задыхаюсь! Я наверное умираю! Мне страшно! Мне холодно! Мне очень ярко до…
Так я жила, росла и общалась с этим голосом. Мне было спокойно и комфортно. Я видела, что у меня полностью, пропорционально сформировалось моё тело, и пришло полное понимание, что я - существо женского пола. Эмоций у меня относительно этого не возникало никаких, ведь я помнила очень много своих воплощений и в них я была как женского, так и мужского пола, а ещё я помнила, что были и воплощения где не было никакого пол…
Исповедь эмбриона
Моё появление в этом мире
Очень странная вещь, но я помню своё появление в этом мире, а точнее я помню как я здесь появилась. Я понимаю, что это необычно для нынешнего современного человека. Но в моей памяти очень часто всплывает и всплывает этот момент, особенно если я вижу какие-либо триггерные для себя ситуации. Поделюсь с вами своим воспоминанием.
Я – очень маленький розовато-пупырчатый биологи…
Сейчас Вела с канала "Саргус" прислала мне свои воспоминания о том, как она появилась здесь, что она помнит. Это к слову о том, зачем мы здесь появляемся-остается под вопросом... Ниже выкладываю ее воспоминание.
❤52👍15🔥8👀4🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @granivechnosty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 484,654 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Грани Вечности” (@granivechnosty), 12,788 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/granivechnosty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.