Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Грамотно говоря

Channel

Грамотно говоря

@gramotno_govorya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,085subscribers

-110 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247848220
TypeChannel
Username@gramotno_govorya
Created31 August 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gramotno_govorya

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,08515,19515,1407 August 2026 — 15,195 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,195 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,191 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,179 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,173 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,166 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,159 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,154 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,147 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,135 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,133 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,127 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,121 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,135 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,133 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,131 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,123 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,165 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,174 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,180 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,176 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,170 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,166 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,163 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,173 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,167 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,157 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,137 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,122 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,096 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,092 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,085 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,069–15,212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 02:1815,085-7
14 Sept 2026, 08:5815,092-4
12 Sept 2026, 18:5815,096-26
10 Sept 2026, 22:1715,122-15
7 Sept 2026, 20:3515,137-20
4 Sept 2026, 23:5715,157-10
3 Sept 2026, 10:1415,167-6
2 Sept 2026, 03:0415,173+10
1 Sept 2026, 05:1415,163-3
31 Aug 2026, 01:5815,166-4
29 Aug 2026, 23:0615,170-6
28 Aug 2026, 21:0215,176-4
27 Aug 2026, 22:2415,180+6
26 Aug 2026, 19:4315,174+9
25 Aug 2026, 17:5215,165+42
24 Aug 2026, 18:2915,123-8
23 Aug 2026, 03:2715,131-2
21 Aug 2026, 17:1715,133-2
20 Aug 2026, 16:3815,135+14
19 Aug 2026, 19:2715,121first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.46%
avg views ÷ 15,085 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held60 (29 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total30,400
Reactions total800
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,010 reactions across 59 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍87843.7%
🔥41320.5%
22211.0%
🤔21910.9%
👏1708.46%
🤯793.93%
🙏291.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,010 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC325 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Я имею в виду» и «типа того». Обе конструкции появляются, когда говорящий хочет уточнить или смягчить сказанное. Но работают по-разному. «Я имею в виду» пытается вернуть мысль к более точному смыслу. «Типа того» наоборот делает её ещё более приблизительной. В небольших дозах почти незаметны. Но когда становятся привычными, речь теряет плотность. Слушатель начинает чувствовать, что мысль всё время нуждается в допо

👍12🔥1🤯1

2 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC680 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Выносить сор из избы». Изначально выражение было связано с конкретным запретом: не выносить сор из дома, чтобы не навлечь беду и не показать соседям непорядок в хозяйстве. Со временем смысл расширился. Теперь так говорят о любом разглашении того, что принято считать внутренним делом. Сама бытовая практика давно ушла, а предостережение осталось. Язык снова сохранил форму, изменив наполнение. Фразеологизмы часто ж

👍20🔥53🤯3

1 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC752 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍6🤔5🤯5🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC753 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Любите поэзию? Желаете почитать что-то новое? Хотите помечтать? Посетите канал Забытые страницы. Канал публикует лучшие современные стихи, не забывая о поэзии прошлого. На нашем канале ежедневно выходят стихотворные викторины!!! Уродливый кот Когда-то давно жил я в стареньком доме. С тех пор пролетел не один уже год. И всем его жителям было известно Насколько уродлив был местный наш кот. Уродливый кот был всегда

8👍2🔥2👏1

1 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC800 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В мессенджерах интонацию приходится угадывать. Одно и то же «Хорошо» может быть согласием, усталостью, раздражением или вежливым завершением разговора. Мы достраиваем тон сами — и часто ошибаемся. В устной речи интонация несёт огромную часть смысла. На письме она почти исчезает. Остаются знаки препинания и наш собственный опыт. Именно поэтому так легко возникают недоразумения. Мы читаем чужой текст своим голосом.

🔥17👍11🤯52🤔2

31 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC857 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ещё раз о «несмотря на» и «не смотря на». Тема кажется простой. Но ошибки продолжают появляться. Особенно в быстрой переписке. «Несмотря на» — предлог (вопреки). «Не смотря на» — деепричастие с отрицанием. Глаз уже настолько привык к слитной форме, что автоматически подставляет её даже туда, где нужно раздельное написание. Хороший пример того, как частота употребления начинает влиять на восприятие правила. Иногда

🔥12👍73👏3🤯1

31 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC774 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

"ТЫ МЕНЯ НА РАССВЕТЕ РАЗБУДИШЬ..." Канал Просто стихи - о поэзии. Без биографий поэтов. Без "пикантных" подробностей их жизни. Без отрывков в пару строк. Без виршей тех, кто мнит себя поэтами. Тут просто лучшие стихи классиков. В чистом виде. Они заслуживают чтения и любви. Подари себе наслаждение, подпишись! https://t.me/prostostihiya

🔥5👍21

30 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC956 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Положить зубы на полку». Сейчас это значит сильно ограничить себя в еде или в тратах. А изначально образ был совсем бытовым. Когда еды не хватало, зубам действительно становилось нечего делать. Их как будто «клали на полку» — в ожидании лучших времён. Выражение сохранило телесность и конкретность. Именно поэтому оно до сих пор звучит живо, хотя сама ситуация, породившая его, давно ушла. Язык любит такие точные т

👍23🔥5🤔5👏3🤯1

29 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,160 views73 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Твóрог или творóг? И́наче или инáче? Есть слова, в которых норма уже заметно сдвинулась. Словари ещё держат один вариант, а большинство говорящих давно выбирает другой. Это не катастрофа. Это обычный процесс. Язык постоянно пересматривает свои предпочтения. Просто обычно мы замечаем это слишком поздно — когда изменение уже свершилось. Сейчас такие сдвиги можно наблюдать в реальном времени. И это одно из самых инте

👍55🤯75🔥3🤔3

28 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,160 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍11🤔6🔥2🤯2

28 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,220 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Язык — не только набор правил. Иногда он становится способом видеть мир точнее. Когда мы начинаем различать оттенки слов, замечаем, как ударение меняет смысл, и слышим, что именно выдаёт наша речь — мышление тоже становится острее. Речь и мысль связаны теснее, чем кажется. Если хочется двигаться дальше — от поверхности слов к устройству самой ясности — продолжение здесь: @gramotno_mysli #Мост

🔥13👍43🤯1

28 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC738 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🟥 Я ИЗ СССР! Кто со мной? 🟥 Подруга посоветовала канал 🎶ЭСТРАДА СССР🟥 Настоящая путевка в детство, такое беззаботное и счастливое!!! Все песни самые родные! Слушаю со слезами на глазах, спасибо каналу за возвращение в наш родной СССР ❤️ Рекомендую, подписывайтесь на настоящую родную музыку!

5👍4🤯2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @gramotno_govorya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTCAnonymous Poll235 voters

Как вы относитесь к фразе «честно говоря»?

  1. Нормально, сам(а) часто использую25%
  2. Раздражает, когда другие говорят9%
  3. Замечаю, но сам(а) почти не говорю19%
  4. Считаю, что она уже потеряла смысл14%
  5. Вообще не обращаю внимания39%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Poll190 voters

Какое слово-паразит чаще всего предаёт вашу неуверенность?

  1. Как бы23%
  2. Типа21%
  3. В принципе15%
  4. Ну вот17%
  5. Скажем так6%
  6. Вообще не ловлю себя на этом39%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Грамотно говоря” (@gramotno_govorya), 15,085 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gramotno_govorya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.