Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Граевская о родах дома

Channel

Граевская о родах дома

@graevskaya_rody

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,115subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357608042
TypeChannel
Username@graevskaya_rody
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/graevskaya_rody

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1012,1202,110.57 August 2026 — 2,104 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,103 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,102 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,101 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,109 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,115 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,118 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,120 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,120 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,118 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,117 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,115 subscribers2,1157 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,098–2,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:562,115-2
11 Sept 2026, 19:422,117-1
7 Sept 2026, 16:562,118-2
6 Sept 2026, 07:222,120no change
3 Sept 2026, 02:272,120+2
31 Aug 2026, 05:422,118+3
28 Aug 2026, 04:282,115+6
24 Aug 2026, 19:262,109+8
18 Aug 2026, 21:372,101-1
12 Aug 2026, 20:332,102-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:122,103-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:252,104first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 2,115 subscribers
Avg views / post
219
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held11 (22 May 202625 August 2026)
Views total219
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 53s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5767.1%
❤‍🔥1821.2%
🔥1011.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC219 views6 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

🤍🤍🤍🤍 устала в потугах, сделай это... К потугам сил может остаться мало, и, когда до рождения ребенка остается совсем немного времени, женщине может казаться, что до рождения еще не скоро. Потрогай головку малыша в промежности ❤️ Это даёт ощущение, что малыш уже здесь, еще немножко, он рожится - и роды завершатся. А ещё способствует выплеску окситоцина, который в свою очередь сделает следующую потугу сильнее. Кто

6

21 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC344 views7 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

Не попадайтесь на эту уловку, если хотите родить естественно ‼️ Сегодня это используют как в роддомах, так и в домашних родах. Но это не имеет не только никакого отношения к естественным родам, но и может стать опасным при неправильном применении. В последнее время прямо какая-то мода пошла на то, чтобы в родах дуть в трубочку. С одной стороны многие женщины правда говорят, что им этот прием помогал. Всё, что в р

7

24 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC530 views28 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍событие в мире деторождения и акушерства происходит сейчас в Нижнем Новгороде Её называют "русский Мишель Оден". Во многом благодаря ей сегодня женщины в России имеют возможность рожать естественно после кесарева сечения и даже после двух кесаревых. А женщины, для которых операция единственный возможный способ рождения - прожить мягкое кесарево сечение. Юлия Дмитриевна Вученович, врач акушер-гинеколог, г

❤‍🔥176🔥5

16 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC454 viewsread 6 September 2026
Forwarded from @graevskaya_zachatiePoll

Материнство - это...

  1. [У меня ещё нет деток] ... это ОГРАНИЧЕНИЕ личной жизни, карьерного роста, деградация11%
  2. [У меня ещё нет деток] ... это ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ для личного и карьерного, самореализации, своего дела22%
  3. [У меня 1-2 ребёнка] ... это ОГРАНИЧЕНИЕ личной жизни, карьерного роста, деградация10%
  4. [У меня 1-2 ребенка] ... это ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ для личного и карьерного, самореализации, своего дела30%
  5. [У меня 3 и более детей] ... это ОГРАНИЧЕНИЕ личной жизни, карьерного роста, деградация7%
  6. [У меня 3 и более детей] ... это ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ для личного и карьерного, самореализации, своего дела20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC403 views3 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Forwarded from @graevskaya_zachatiePhoto

🙃😀 😌😍😉😝😇😉🥲 неделе была спикером на женском форуме "Бизнес-интуиция" в Нижнем Новгороде. В рамках дискуссионной площадки "Материнство как высшая школа управления ресурсами" обсуждали, как рождение детей становится драйвером экономического роста и инструментом сохранения нации. Спикерами дискуссионной площадки выступили: ➡️Екатерина Ширманова, советник заместителя Губернатора Нижегородской области, заместитель дирек

🔥3

26 May 2026, 04:54 UTC575 views11 reactionsread 6 September 2026

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 дня домашних родов мы готовим сюрприз для тех, кому они уже скоро предстоят Если половина беременности уже прошла, и вы всё чаще задумываетесь о родах, а близкие и друзья старательно отсыпают вам свои советы, которые часто противоречат друг другу. Если одни говорят "все родили, и ты родишь". Другие советуют рожать только по контракту. Третьи рисуют красивые картинки домашних родов. А вы в растерянности

9🔥2

25 May 2026, 18:54 UTC450 views2 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

25 May 2026, 18:35 UTC452 views10 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 удостоверение по итогам годового обучения и сдачи очного экзамена в методе Интегративно-ресурсной терапии у моего мастера А сегодня полдня плачу... 😭 Завершился какой-то очень большой и важный в моей жизни этап. Да, я знаю, что это не завершение, а начало нового, но все равно чувствую грусть. 15 лет я ждала этого обучения. 15 лет получала свои результаты как клиент и меняла свою жизнь к лучшему. 5 лет ко

9❤‍🔥1

23 May 2026, 10:03 UTC384 views17 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 что я сдала экзамен по Интегративно-ресурсной терапии моему мастеру и психотерапевту - Наталье Юрьевне Ухановой 15 лет назад я впервые пришла к Наталье со своей большой болью, которую носила в себе 10 лет и ни с кем не могла этим поделиться. Одна сессия и моё состояние изменилось - проблема ушла и больше не беспокоила меня. Терапевтический процесс и эффект от него меня так впечатлили, что я тогда приняла р

17

22 May 2026, 02:47 UTC319 views1 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

🤍🤍🤍 специалистов перинатальной сферы - важное! Я знаю, что среди моих прекрасных подписчиц есть специалисты перинатальной сферы - информация ниже для вас 👇 Уже второй год мы с Натальей реализуем программу для перинатальных специалистов "Руки принимающие", которая состоит из трех ступеней: 1️⃣ первая – базовая ступень 2️⃣ вторая – углубленная теория 3️⃣ третья – это наша выездная живая практика, где мы передаем вам

1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @graevskaya_rody. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTCAnonymous Poll152 voters

Материнство - это...

  1. [У меня ещё нет деток] ... это ОГРАНИЧЕНИЕ личной жизни, карьерного роста, деградация11%
  2. [У меня ещё нет деток] ... это ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ для личного и карьерного, самореализации, своего дела22%
  3. [У меня 1-2 ребёнка] ... это ОГРАНИЧЕНИЕ личной жизни, карьерного роста, деградация10%
  4. [У меня 1-2 ребенка] ... это ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ для личного и карьерного, самореализации, своего дела30%
  5. [У меня 3 и более детей] ... это ОГРАНИЧЕНИЕ личной жизни, карьерного роста, деградация7%
  6. [У меня 3 и более детей] ... это ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ для личного и карьерного, самореализации, своего дела20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Аня Семенюк
@wildanie · 55,713
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
📚О правах детей и родителей📚 Alina_malina_pravo
@malina_pravo · 25,071
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
Елена Саакова
@saakova_elena · 25,487
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 September 2026
Мария Коновалова - Всё о женском здоровье
@dockonovalovamarija · 62,924
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Граевская о родах дома” (@graevskaya_rody), 2,115 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/graevskaya_rody.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.