Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 武汉股神

Channel

武汉股神

@gpttzt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,249subscribers

+8,903 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002289109620
TypeChannel
Username@gpttzt
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gpttzt

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,34615,24910,797.57 August 2026 — 6,346 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,372 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,455 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,591 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,710 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,851 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,914 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,978 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,064 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,312 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,492 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,657 subscribers1 October 2026 — 8,950 subscribers7 October 2026 — 9,626 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,386 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,559 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,759 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,967 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,142 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,384 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,578 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,680 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,833 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,906 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,083 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,336 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,671 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,843 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,042 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,215 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,376 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,550 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,741 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,894 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,072 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,215 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,371 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,549 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,692 subscribers8 November 2026 — 14,886 subscribers10 November 2026 — 15,041 subscribers12 November 2026 — 15,249 subscribers7 August 202612 November 2026
43 measurements spanning 97 days, net +8,903. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,011–16,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 07:3415,249+208
10 Nov 2026, 08:5715,041+155
8 Nov 2026, 20:5614,886+194
7 Nov 2026, 11:3614,692+143
6 Nov 2026, 09:2614,549+178
5 Nov 2026, 07:1914,371+156
4 Nov 2026, 03:1914,215+143
3 Nov 2026, 05:1114,072+178
2 Nov 2026, 05:0913,894+153
1 Nov 2026, 02:3113,741+191
31 Oct 2026, 04:1113,550+174
30 Oct 2026, 04:1813,376+161
29 Oct 2026, 04:3813,215+173
28 Oct 2026, 05:0913,042+199
27 Oct 2026, 02:2712,843+172
25 Oct 2026, 23:3912,671+335
24 Oct 2026, 21:0612,336+253
23 Oct 2026, 19:2712,083+177
22 Oct 2026, 22:2611,906+73
21 Oct 2026, 19:5111,833first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.86%
avg views ÷ 15,249 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.158%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held34 (24 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total8,394
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
450
Videos
86
Links
133

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
57s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6087.0%
👍811.6%
🤣11.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:28 UTC993 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#4t#新竹路17号 好久没来光谷了,听说又有嫩妹来,果断出击。先看了一下77号,人照9成,大奶子,估计96年左右的小嫂子,颜值也还行,态度非常好。我选的17号,05年的浙江妹子,身上有纹身,1米65,110斤左右,胸有接近b+,颜值6.3分。 背面先来了一遍胸滑,奶子又嫩又弹,挺舒服的。然后这是吸皮过水,从耳朵到屁股,来回几遍也是相当认真了,在嫩妹里算是服务态度不错的。然后转到正面,内衣一脱,奶子挺挺的,不大不小刚好一手握住。舌头也是从耳朵舔到胸又舔到大腿,小舌头非常灵活,然后就是用果冻假口,还是蛮舒服的,妹妹尺度不大不能舔。躺在身边嗦了几分钟奶子,口感真不错,小屁股也蛮翘。 最后选择了臀推,妹子也是蛮有性情,直接把小裙子掀开到胸上,从肚子到奶子一览无余,微微胖的身材男人的最爱。出完水后,还抱着妹子躺了一会。 ​ 总结。高颜值有胸的嫩妹,服务态度还不错,尺度不大,不爱讲话,喜欢这一款的,可以试试。进群 https://t…

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC819 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026

这个妹子头钟我上了,05年的大胸嫩妹,颜值6.3分,兄弟们多调教,明天发报告。群里有发言半价。

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC708 views0 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @ZXH8877Video

新到04年小妹,17号,甜美小妹,刚下海,需要大哥手把手调教,初入社会不懂事

10 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC811 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

每日发言半价260体验价格 预约客服:@NBG8877 预约双向机器人:@NBG888bot 预约电话:17670192176 预约微信:rcg222888 预约QQ:718184041 武汉会所群聊: t.me/GHNB88

9 Nov 2026, 16:48 UTC863 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @afoolGroupBotPhoto

🎟 抽奖标题: 双十一福利 1.潇潇项目内容 精油spa或柔式+臀疗+三起三落抓龙筋+手推或足 时长60分钟 原价400 增加前列腺高潮的小项 时长80分钟 原价650 2.兑奖有效期截止至11月19号 尽量加微信预约,实在不方便的可以。 电报联系潇潇 @xx13140303 中奖出击的兄弟直接把中奖记录给妹子看就可以 至少写30字评价 潇潇微信yibeiziaini0303 定时开奖 2026-11-12 12:00:00 参与关键词: 科技大涨 已参与: 0人 🎁 奖品列表: 100优惠券 X 1 50优惠券 X 10 参与要求: ➕加入 - 韭菜交流会·武汉 ➕加入 - 韭菜交流会·武汉 └ 💬 发言数大于 15 条 ➕加入 - 潇潇的朋友圈(抓龙筋)

❤1

8 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈2,030 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#4t#书城路98 好久没来熊猫这,没看照片直接给我安排了新人98。一进门就让人眼前一亮,颜值很高而且很白,直接给到6.4分,只能说真人比我发的照片好看。人很瘦但有胸接近b+,更主要的人非常热情,一进来就笑嘻嘻的跟你开玩笑,情绪价值很高。后来聊天得知,妹子是99的朋友,刚来武汉几天,00年,大概163,100斤福建人。 背面服务就不细说了,转过来身材是真好,少有的小裙子把腰漏出来的妹子,腰上一点赘肉没有很光滑。妹子虽然戴着假舌头,但是浑身上下舔的非常认真,特别是假口让我已经一柱擎天。也是主动把奶子喂给我吃,手顺势绕向下盘,已经湿漉漉。 手臂脖子可以随便亲,但是耳朵怕痒会躲。接着还是照例让妹子躺在旁边,我边嗦奶边摸下面,妹子还觉得不尽兴,直接抓着我的手指挥起来,告诉我怎么摸她最舒服,怎么才能让她高潮,反正你们手法温柔一点,妹子可以伸进去摸,能看的出来她还是比较享受的。 就这样约摸越湿越润,已经洪水泛滥。然后我就提出要舔,妹子…

❤1

25 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,170 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @lubailushiluVideo

潇潇抓龙筋 @xx13140303 之前中过奖🐦过我,这次去补偿给了优惠,原价的话也不亏,他那个群好像每周都有抽奖。 软硬件:人照相符,本人更瘦,如果去做ls属于颜值不错,非常有韵味的御姐,很有女人味,没有一丝嫂味。🐻b,腿挺细,肉量很合适。相处非常舒服,温柔御姐。 尺度:问就是隔衣服摸,肯定不会让你伸进去摸🐻,更不会扒出来给你看,是的。 按摩调情:可选b面柔式和精油。我选的精油,手法可以,时不时撩过我的小痔疮调戏我。 抓龙筋:真不是花式打飞机。手法有点东西,以让你几剂药爆炸为目标。问了下这是不是三起三落,说对于我这种敏感123就是做边缘控制,到阈值后按穴位给他放软,再硬,反复;对你们这种不敏感的装机,不一定严格三起三落,可以一直硬着刺激一直爽。 放水:可选足🦶或手。突然变骚了,调整体位让你能摸屁股摸🐻,真没让我伸进去,更没有主动漏出来给我看,对。呻吟➕骚话,“这么硬坐上来摇顶到花心肯定爽死了”。…

❤8

11 Oct 2026, 05:48 UTC≈4,750 views0 reactionsread 12 November 2026

潇潇搞了个新频道,大家可以关注一下 https://t.me/xiaoxiao_010

7 Oct 2026, 14:15 UTC≈4,920 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

梦天使巨乳妹子回来了,限时供应啊,半裸抓龙筋,位置在积玉桥万达 要去的赶紧去,联系 @whmts,这个妹子叫阿风

❤4

29 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC≈4,370 views11 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

可可去唐家墩上班了 大家提前加妹子微信预约 K-K---123 可可基本信息 05年,163,90斤。胸b。 之前干了3年多纯绿spa,这是第一次进入擦边行业 项目内容 精油spa+臀疗+头疗+三起三落抓龙筋+手推 时长60分钟 原价400 基础套餐上增加躺采 时长80分钟 原价500 标准尺度 最多隔着衣服摸,下面不能摸。上下不脱。无口无大 高颜值甜妹,笑起来非常可爱,兄弟们多逗她笑 上班时间 中午1点-晚上11点 地点 唐家墩 实在不方便加微信的,电报给可可发消息,可能回复不会很及时 @KekeKemerovo

❤11

28 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈5,420 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#4t#后湖蜗牛88 今天去蜗牛看了几个人,第一个进来的是00号,大概02年左右,6.2分。第二个是11号,04年大胸,颜值6.2分。最后选的88号,06年浙江嫩妹,颜值6.6分顶美,大概165 95斤,有一点符文b奶完美身材,刚入行不到20天。 上来的的按摩我就直接跳过了,然后是指滑和果冻舔,手法啥的就中规中矩了,嫩妹不能要求太多,然后是跪趴摸鸡儿,手感还不错,妹妹声音很嗲,很可爱。 翻到正面来,颜值果然没得说,绝对算4t里面的顶美了,嫩的出水那种,有一点点精神小妹的感觉,奶子也很挺,手感特别棒。 先是侧着身,用果冻舔了一遍全身,我的手就顺着屁股摸向了豆豆,毛毛好硬,少女皮肤是真好,滑不溜秋的,舔了舔妹子的手臂,她超级怕痒。惊喜的地方,是她居然还学了假口,有模有样的也挺有刺激感。 然后让他躺着摸了下胸和豆豆,本来是不让亲下面的,然后我就假装说亲一下她的屁股,软软弹弹的,她夹的好紧,然后趁他不注意把她翻过身来,舔向了妹妹…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @gpttzt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTCAnonymous Poll153 voters

这个月有多少人听我劝没有买硬件,在医药中概软件里赚钱全身而退的?

  1. 没听,亏钱了33%
  2. 听了,赚钱了14%
  3. 吃瓜52%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTCAnonymous Poll338 voters

最近没咋出去玩,后面考虑搞点新店,更新一下内容,看看大家对什么方向比较感兴趣,可多选

  1. 4t24%
  2. 老师29%
  3. Mmk15%
  4. 足疗spa45%
  5. 股票14%
  6. 德州7%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“武汉股神” (@gpttzt), 15,249 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gpttzt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.