دانش فهم نمیشود، مگر با سوال و تفکر #فهم 🆔️ @gozidenevisi

Channel
گزیدهنویس|طاهره خادمی
@gozidenevisi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002103427210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gozidenevisi |
| Description | کانالی برای تاملات مختصر کانال محتوایی اصلی:https://t.me/taherehkhademi گاه یک جمله میتواند مغز را به قلب گره بزند و گاه میتواند همه گرهها را باز کند پس در هر دو حالت جملهنویسی عالی است |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gozidenevisi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 31 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 171.0%
- avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 53.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2025 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 53 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 7
- Links
- 53
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 78.6% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ترس بهترین راهنما و بدترین همراه است #ترس 🆔️ @gozidenevisi
👍1
چطور میتوان وقت را به شیوهای آموزنده تلف کرد؟ چطور میتوان زندگی را به شیوهای شیرین، تلخ کرد؟ چطور میتوان عمر را به شیوهای جسورانه پوچ کرد؟ چطور میتوان خانه را به شیوهای خیال انگیز جهنم کرد؟ و چطور میتوان نَفْس را به شیوهای عزتمندانه از پا درآورد؟ این جملات پارادوکسیکال، حین انجام تمرینوشتن به ذهنم رسید. گاهی این فرصت را به خودم میدهم که داستانی کوتاه بنویسم، جملاتی عجیب بنویسم و اینگونه بیشتر از هر آنِ بی…
❤2
*تو همانی که به خود میگویی* در یکی از کلاسها، استاد از «۵ زبان عشق» حرف زد؛ کتابی با همین نام که عنوان میکند: آدمها، عشق را فقط با یک زبان نشان نمیدهند. گاهی با رفتار Act گاهی با کلام Word گاهی با لمس و نزدیکی امن Touch گاهی با وقت گذاشتن Time و گاهی با هدیه دادن Gift اما چیزی که برایم جالبتر بود، این بود: ما فقط با دیگران با این زبانها حرف نمیزنیم؛ با خودمان هم حرف میزنیم…
https://t.me/taherehkhademi/1650
مغز خلاق و منحصر به فرد ما، مانند اثر انگشت یکتایمان، خوب بلد است راهها و چاهها را تشخیص دهد. این نیازهای مهم ما هستند، که میان راه و چاه، یکی را انتخاب کرده و ما را به مقصد یا کوره راه میرسانند. 1 اسفند 1404 🆔 @gozidenevisi
برای زندگی کردن از غمها اجازه میگیریم؟ 30 بهمن 1404 🆔 @gozidenevisi
قضاوت کردن آدمها را بگذاریم برای روزهایی که علم غیب داریم و آینده را دقیق و شفاف میبینم. 23 بهمن 1404 🆔 @gozidenevisi
بیصداترین فریادها از گلوهایی بیرون میآید که آرام میگریند اما بلند میخندند 22 بهمن 1404 🆔 @gozidenevisi
«شگفتانگیز است که گاه در تلاطمِ سهمگینترین بحرانها، چون کوهی استوار پایداری میکنیم، اما در برابرِ نسیمِ ملایمِ کوچکترین چالشها، بهناگاه فرو میریزیم.» 20 بهمن 1404 🆔 @gozidenevisi
شناگر خوب کسی است که یاد گرفته، دریای زندگی نیاز به یادگیری دارد، وگرنه هرکس میتواند شناور خوبی باشد. جمله 15 آذر 1404 🆔 @gozidenevisi
❤1
روش موفقیت اصول مشخصی دارد اما الزاما آن اصول مشخص، همهی آدمها را به موفقیت نمیرساند. اصولی باعث موفقیت میشود که شخص توانسته باشد با شکل و روش زندگی شخص همخوانی ایجاد کرده و به او انگیزه و انرژی بدهد. جمله ۲۶ آبان ۱۴۰۴ 🆔️ @gozidenevisi
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gozidenevisi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 105,652 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گزیدهنویس|طاهره خادمی” (@gozidenevisi), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gozidenevisi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.