Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for gotlibgotlibgotlib

Channel

gotlibgotlibgotlib

@gotlib

3 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

23,343subscribers

-562 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002844904466
TypeChannel
Usernames@fuckgotlib @gotlib @gotlibgotlibgotlib
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held185
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gotlib

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

23,34323,90523,6246 August 202612 November 2026
185 measurements spanning 97 days, net -562. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,259–23,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 185
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 08:0023,343no change
12 Nov 2026, 07:1023,343-13
11 Nov 2026, 03:1923,356-6
10 Nov 2026, 09:4923,362no change
10 Nov 2026, 08:4123,362-11
9 Nov 2026, 09:0823,373no change
8 Nov 2026, 23:4823,373-7
8 Nov 2026, 18:5023,380-10
7 Nov 2026, 23:5723,390-2
7 Nov 2026, 17:1823,392no change
7 Nov 2026, 11:5923,392-7
6 Nov 2026, 19:5723,399no change
6 Nov 2026, 16:0823,399-3
6 Nov 2026, 09:5623,402-1
5 Nov 2026, 17:4023,403no change
5 Nov 2026, 13:5623,403-3
5 Nov 2026, 11:1023,406-11
4 Nov 2026, 17:0123,417-1
4 Nov 2026, 10:4623,418-3
4 Nov 2026, 07:3923,421first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.9%
avg views ÷ 23,343 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,780
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.334%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held24 (25 March 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total29,340
Reactions total98
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 02:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17,197 reactions across 24 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 525599639633031759912,55873.0%
custom 52557222227980121144,63927.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,197 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Oct 2026, 16:28 UTC≈10,700 views38 reactionsread 18 October 2026

любимки...

custom 525599639633031759938

15 Oct 2026, 16:28 UTC≈10,700 views30 reactionsread 18 October 2026

@bogemaleningrad

custom 525599639633031759930

15 Oct 2026, 16:28 UTC≈7,940 views30 reactionsread 18 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 525599639633031759930

4 Sept 2026, 15:04 UTC≈28,500 views479 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

CONCERT

custom 5255996396330317599479

20 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC≈43,500 views1,170 reactionsread 12 November 2026

среди всех моих друзей только худшие

custom 52559963963303175991,170

23 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈60,800 views1,720 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Было бы сильно)

custom 52559963963303175991,720

23 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈73,200 views2,000 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Есть у кого контакт репера 9mice? У меня время освободилось как раз, а переписка пропала…

custom 52559963963303175992,000

23 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC≈45,200 views766 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 5255996396330317599766

19 Jun 2026, 11:23 UTC≈66,700 views1,382 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

приятно…

custom 5255996396330317599934custom 5255722222798012114448

19 Jun 2026, 11:22 UTC≈51,700 views767 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

хз..

custom 5255722222798012114500custom 5255996396330317599267

18 Jun 2026, 21:03 UTC≈42,600 views718 reactionsread 12 November 2026

за хуевые хорошие биты проклятье…

custom 5255722222798012114447custom 5255996396330317599271

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @gotlib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @gotlib as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
27 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“gotlibgotlibgotlib” (@gotlib), 23,343 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gotlib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.