господи храни авито эти винтажные подкрадули нашла у какой-то милой женщины, за 1500р…🌸
custom 62082956921636151915custom 52719720898284910341custom 53999013672318599321custom 54651813997974810751

Channel
@goryacheva2000
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
496subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001505908530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goryacheva2000 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goryacheva2000 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 496 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 498 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 498 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
78 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5233259359156313900 | 19 | 24.4% | |
| custom 5465181399797481075 | 14 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5390824306039078646 | 13 | 16.7% | |
| custom 6208295692163615191 | 12 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5399901367231859932 | 9 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5271972089828491034 | 6 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5289691286645789296 | 4 | 5.13% | |
| custom 5395493910447408222 | 1 | 1.28% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goryacheva2000. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 7 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
господи храни авито эти винтажные подкрадули нашла у какой-то милой женщины, за 1500р…🌸
custom 62082956921636151915custom 52719720898284910341custom 53999013672318599321custom 54651813997974810751
такой вот гуд морнинг из Кореи 🍥🤍 >>наконец-то они пришли ко мне посотрудничать!
custom 52332593591563139005custom 52719720898284910342custom 53999013672318599322
Backstage, снимаем фейский контент⭐️🤩
custom 62082956921636151917custom 52332593591563139002custom 53908243060390786462
Апдейт: я списала это со своей кредитки… это была моя карта 😅
custom 53908243060390786461custom 53999013672318599321
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52332593591563139003custom 53908243060390786461custom 53999013672318599321
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53908243060390786461custom 54651813997974810751
друзья, мои друзья, я только что заказала кфс, у меня была чья то карта из вас вбита почему-то, у кого списалось 950р сейчас, напишите))))) ахахахахах
custom 53908243060390786465
я прям оч злюсь, когда крадут мое оформление постов, видео, мои штуки, шрифты, цвета, причем это супер видно, так как до этого я знаю, что человек юзал другое Это нормально, что меня это бесит? Или нужно поработать надо собой?
custom 54651813997974810755custom 52332593591563139003custom 53908243060390786462custom 53999013672318599322
Долгожданное сотрудничество 💅🏼
custom 52332593591563139006custom 52896912866457892964custom 52719720898284910343custom 54651813997974810753
☕️🥨🐶Мороженное с карамелизированными и свежими нектаринами, крошкой из печенья, сгущенкой… А что вам готовит ваш парень в выходной????
custom 54651813997974810754custom 53999013672318599322custom 53908243060390786461custom 53954939104474082221
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @goryacheva2000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дарья любит тратить” (@goryacheva2000), 496 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goryacheva2000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.