Channel
@gorkispbu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,401subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001811223919 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gorkispbu |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gorkispbu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 1,401 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 1,406 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 1,410 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 1,414 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 1,416 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 1,416 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
37 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 35.1% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 24.3% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 16.2% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 8.11% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 5.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Today, the G.O.R.K.I. Centre of St. Petersburg State University hosted the debate “What Has Happened to the Fundamental Principle of Law Pacta Sunt Servanda (‘Agreements Must Be Kept’): Current Assessment in the Light of the Anti-Russia Sanctions Imposed by the EU.” Moderated by Dr. Karin Kneissl, the discussion brought together legal scholars and practitioners to examine how sanctions have affected one of the fundam…
❤3🍾2👍2
On 26 June, as part of the St. Petersburg International Legal Forum, head of the G.O.R.K.I. Centre SPbU, Karin Kneissl delivered a lecture titled “Why meritocracy matters - a perspective for young legal scholars”. Beginning with the origins of the term—merit (to deserve) and kratos (power)—Dr. Kneissl traced the historical evolution of meritocracy from the imperial examination system in China to the French civil ser…
👏3❤2🆒2
At today’s session “The Concept of ‘Hostile Actions’ by Unfriendly Foreign States toward Russia and Measures to Further Improve Russian Legislation in This Area” at the St. Petersburg International Legal Forum, participants discussed the growing role of sanctions, economic coercion, and extraterritorial measures in international relations. Among the speakers was Karin Kneissl, head of the G.O.R.K.I. Centre SPbU, who…
❤3👍3
On 24 June, the St. Petersburg International Legal Forum hosted the session “Economic Warfare against Freedom of Navigation: How to Navigate Maritime Trade amid Unlawful Restrictions and Piracy,” organised by the G.O.R.K.I. Centre. The discussion brought together representatives of the Russian Ministry of Transport and the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, maritime law practitioners, shipowners, and experts in in…
❤2
Today, a presentation of the German edition of “Requiem for Europe” by Karin Kneissl took place at the Russian Embassy in Vienna. Published by St. Petersburg University Publishing, the book offers a deeply personal perspective on the fate of the European Union in an era of global transformation. Dr. Kneissl — former Austrian Foreign Minister and current Head of the G.O.R.K.I. Centre at SPbU — reflects on the Europe …
🔥6👍2💯2
Today, G.O.R.K.I. Centre SPbU hosted the final business breakfast of this academic year, titled “Future Expectations about Russian‑Chinese Relations: How to Imagine a Consensus?”. The discussion highlighted that from the Chinese side, the relationship is deeply pragmatic but goes beyond economics — reflecting a serious shift toward Eastern culture. As one speaker noted, geography decides many things, and cooperation…
❤3👍2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @gorkispbu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 894,385 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“G.O.R.K.I. Talks” (@gorkispbu), 1,401 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gorkispbu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.