Channel
@gora_hist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
281subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001603826509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gora_hist |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gora_hist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 281 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 282 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 283 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 283 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
143 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 46.9% | |
| 🕊 | 26 | 18.2% | |
| 🐳 | 11 | 7.69% | |
| 👻 | 8 | 5.59% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 4.90% | |
| 🦄 | 6 | 4.20% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 2.80% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.80% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.10% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.699% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.699% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.699% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.699% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.699% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸 Портсмутский мир Повторяем итоги русско-японской войны, которая завершилась подписанием в 1905 году мирного договора в Америке Кто участвовал, что хотела Россия от мирного договора и как его условия встретили обычные люди? ✅ Все это в комиксе от журнала Дилетант
❤4❤🔥2🕊2👻1
🌙 Повторяем много терминов и фактов к ним для задания 19! Почти все уже были на ЕГЭ и могут повториться снова
❤6🕊2❤🔥1🏆1💯1
✅ Досрочный 2026 Что еще было на резерве досрочного в понедельник? Продолжаем уточнять формулировки 17 задание В одном из вариантов чуть ли не единственным маркером было празднование 24 годовщины Октября — в первом вопросе нужно было указать год событий Во втором по стандартным маркерам нужно было назвать Московскую битву 20 задание В первом варианте просили сравнить восстания 1068 г. и 1113 г. в Киеве Во втор…
❤5⚡2👻2❤🔥1🕊1
А ночью или уже завтра постараемся рассказать подробнее про эти варианты 🤍 Только ставьте побольше реакций, пожалуйста 🙏🏼 Ваша поддержка сейчас очень важна
❤18🕊2
Если сдаете еще и общество, приходите к нам во второй канал @gora_obsh ❤️ Там тоже отследили 6 вариантов досрочного (включая резерв) и даже нашли целый оригинал одного из кимов На днях поделимся подробностями!
❤8🕊2💘1
✅ Задания, которые были сегодня на резерве досрочного Сегодня по всей стране было только 2 этих варианта Как вам сюжеты 18? 🗻 @gora_hist
❤11🔥2⚡1🕊1
Так вот, оказывается, сегодня на резерве досрочного как раз был такой термин «расширение НАТО на восток» 😳 нужно было раскрыть термин в историческом контексте и указать факт для истории России или зарубежных стран Если что, нам это не приснилось, реально был))
❤5🕊2🤯2
А он вообще-то есть историко-культурном стандарте И в едином учебнике тоже Прям точно не верим? 🙃
🕊9👻3❤1🤷♂1
Доброе утро, дорогие подписчики! Если мы расскажем вам, что в 19 задании на ЕГЭ может попасть термин о расширении НАТО, вы поверите? 🦄 да 🐳 нет
🐳10🦄6👻2🕊1
… оказалось, что задания выше мы и правда придумали 🚫 (но посмотрите комментарии) Поэтому сегодня повторяем дворцовые перевороты! Кто за кем правил? 1725 – 1727 годы Екатерина I 1727 – 1730 годы Петр II 1730 – 1740 годы Анна Иоанновна 1740 – 1741 годы Иван VI Антонович 1741 – 1761 годы Елизавета Петровна 1761 – 1762 годы Петр III Всех-всех нанесли на схему и еще раз отметили последовательность монархов 🔥 Что во…
❤3⚡2🐳1🔥1🕊1🤯1
Вы верите в такой вариант? Вдруг админам это просто приснилось 🦄
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3🕊2😭2✍1
✔️ 18 задание Как и в заданиях на сравнение, пока все известные нам 18-е задания новые При этом сам сюжет довольно знакомый — он уже встречался на ЕГЭ 2022 и 2025 Единственное пересечение с прошлым годом — назвать причину похода, связанную с внешней политикой Новгорода Пункт (б) кажется довольно простым А что вы писали бы в пункте (в)? 🧐 @gora_hist
❤3⚡2🔥1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @gora_hist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы верите в такой вариант? Вдруг админам это просто приснилось 🦄
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 25 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 84,738 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GORA История ЕГЭ” (@gora_hist), 281 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gora_hist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.