Channel
@goolfs
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,226subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001052208517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goolfs |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 March 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goolfs |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @m_arefan/2259145 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC | @goolfs/383986 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @m_arefan/2259155 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC | @goolfs/383987 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @m_arefan/2259165 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC | @goolfs/383988 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @goolfs/383981 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC | @m_arefan/2259246 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC | 1.00 | 18 hours |
| @m_arefan/2259296 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC | @goolfs/384033 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC | 1.00 | 32 hours |
| @goolfs/384025 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC | @m_arefan/2259487 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @m_arefan | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (14–4) |
| @chekame_20 | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @chekame_20 (6–0) |
| @mehroshadii | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @mehroshadii (5–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 33 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @chekame_20. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 2,226 | +21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 2,205 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 2,211 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 2,211 | +1 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 2,210 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 890 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
بندهٔ سید سرمستانیم همه عالم به جوی نستانیم نقطه ای در الفی می یابیم در کتبخانه کتب می خوانیم باطنا گنج فراوان داریم ظاهراً گرچه بسی ویرانیم دُرد دردش به دوا می جوئیم دردمندانه پی درمانیم از در شاه گدائی کردیم لاجرم در دو جهان سلطانیم آنکه گویند و همانش خوانند گر تو آن می طلبی ما آنیم نعمت الله به همه بنمودیم سر پیدا و نهان می دانیم حضرت شاه نعمتالله ولی
Signed انسانم آرزوست🙏 fs
کجا باشد دورویان را میانِ عاشقان جایی؟ که با صد رو طمع دارد ز روزِ عشق فردایی طمع دارند و نَبْوَدشان، که شاهِ جان کند ردْشان ز آهن سازد او سدشان، چو ذوالقَرنینآسایی دورویی با چنان رویی، پلیدی در چنان جویی چه گُنجد پیشِ صدّیقان؟ نفاقی کارفرمایی که بیخِ بیشۀ جان را، همه رگهایِ شیران را بداند یکبهیک آن را، بهدیدهیْ نوراَفزایی بداند عاقبتها را، فرستد راتِبَتها را ببخشد عافیتها را، به هر صدّیق و یکتایی براند…
Signed انسانم آرزوست🙏 fs
غافل مباش ار عاقلی دریاب اگر صاحب دلی باشد که نتوان یافتن دیگر چنین ایام را جایی که سرو بوستان با پای چوبین میچمد ما نیز در رقص آوریم آن سرو سیم اندام را #حضرت_سعدی
Signed انسانم آرزوست🙏 fs
درویش را احتراز می باید کردن و لقمه ی هرکسی را نباید خوردن، که درویش لطیف است، در او اثر می کند چیزها و بر او ظاهر می شود. همچنانکه در جامه ی پاک سپید، اندکی سیاهی ظاهر می شود. اما بر جامه ی سیاه که چندین سال از چرک سیاه شده و رنگ سپیدی از او گردیده، اگر هزار گونه چرک و چربی بچکد، بر خلق و بر او ظاهر نگردد. پس چون چنین است، درویش را لقمه ی ظالمان و حرام خواران و جسمانیان نباید خوردن. که در درویش، لقمه ی آن کس اثر ک…
Signed انسانم آرزوست🙏 fs
وقتها باشد که بگذرم ، یاران را سلام نکنم ، نه از آزار . تا این نیز گفته باشم . ایشان نمی دانند که ما در حق ایشان چه می اندیشیم ، اگر دانستندی که ایشان را چه صفا و پاکدلی و دولت می جوئیم ، پیش ما جان بدادندی . شمس_تبریزی
Signed انسانم آرزوست🙏 fs
بدان که حقیقت بهشت «موافقت» است و حقیقت دوزخ «مخالفت» است و حقیقت خوشی یافتن مراد است و حقیقت ناخوشی نایافتن مراد است و اگر کسی دیگر بعبارتی دیگر گفته باشد، یا بگوید معنی این همین باشد که ما گفتیم. چون حقیقت بهشت و دوزخ را دانستی اکنون بدان که بهشت و دوزخ درهای بسیار دارند، جمله اقوال و افعال پسندیده، و اخلاق حمیده درهای بهشت اند؛ و جملۀ اقوال وافعال ناپسندیده، و اخلاق ذمیمه درهای دوزخ اند از جهت آن که هر رنج و ناخ…
Signed انسانم آرزوست🙏 fs
گر مِی نخوری طعنه مزن مستان را بنیاد مکَن تو حیله و دستان را تو غره بدان مشو که مِی مینخوری صد لقمه خوری که مِی غلام است آن را #خیام
Signed Sogand🍃🦋
🌿💕 دل به زنجیر تو ،، گر من نکنم ،، پس چه کنم ؟؟ سر و جان را به فـدایت نکنم ،، پس چه کنم ؟؟ ناز چشمان تو ،، از دور خمااارم کرده ... جان فدای ناز چشمت ،، نکنم ،، پس چه کنم ؟؟ 🌿💕 راحم_تبریزی
Signed Sogand🍃🦋
گر سُبحۀ صددانه شماری، خوب است ور جامِ مِی از کف نگذاری، خوب است گفتی: چه کنم چه تحفه آرم برِ دوست؟ بی درد مَیا ؛ هر آنچه آری، خوب است #ابوسعید_ابوالخیر
Signed Sogand🍃🦋
🌺🌿💫
Signed Sogand🍃🦋
جان و جهان .. . جان و جهان دوش کجا بودهای نی غلطم ، در دل ما بودهای دوش ز هجر تو جفا دیدهام ای که تو سلطان وفا بودهای آه که من دوش چه سان بودهام آه که تو دوش کرا بودهای رشک برم کاش قبا بودمی چونک در آغوش قبا بودهای زهره ندارم که بگویم ترا بی من بیچاره چرا بودهای؟ یار سبک روح به وقت گریز تیزتر از باد صبا بودهای بیتو مرا رنج و بلا بند کرد باش که تو بنده بلا بودهای رنگ رخ خوب تو آخر گواست در حرم لطف خدا بوده…
Signed Sogand🍃🦋
🌿🌺 شب عاشقان بیدل چه شبی دراز باشد تو بیا کز اول شب در صبح باز باشد عجبست اگر توانم که سفر کنم ز دستت به کجا رود کبوتر که اسیر باز باشد ز محبتت نخواهم که نظر کنم به رویت که محب صادق آنست که پاکباز باشد به کرشمه عنایت نگهی به سوی ما کن که دعای دردمندان ز سر نیاز باشد سخنی که نیست طاقت که ز خویشتن بپوشم به کدام دوست گویم که محل راز باشد چه نماز باشد آن را که تو در خیال باشی تو صنم نمیگذاری که مرا نماز باش…
Signed Sogand🍃🦋
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @goolfs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 441,842 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گلها” (@goolfs), 2,226 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goolfs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.