Channel
Google Maps Reviews Crypto💲
@google_reviewsz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,134subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002206543570 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @google_reviewsz |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/google_reviewsz |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:04 | 4,134 | +12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:08 | 4,122 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:04 | 4,128 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:49 | 4,131 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 4,133 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 4,134 | +4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 4,130 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 22:07 | 4,131 | +20 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 4,111 | +18 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 4,093 | -19 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 4,112 | -35 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 4,147 | -29 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 4,176 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:03 | 4,185 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 4,185 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@quietlyairdrops2 · 64,089
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 9 September 2026
@free_Airdrop_crypto_currency · 18,228
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 September 2026
@History_UPSC_SSC_Railway_Gk · 25,253
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Google Maps Reviews Crypto💲” (@google_reviewsz), 4,134 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/google_reviewsz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.