Channel
@google_irl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001855546230 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @google_irl |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 2 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/google_irl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 70 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2023 to 29 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Rocket-чек на 3000 JETTON (2 570.4$) Внутри чека: 8000 активация(й) по 0.3 JETTON (0.3$) с реферальной наградой 0.075 JETTON (0.06$) 💬 💬 Игровая платформа @JetTon разыгрывает 10 000$ для новых игроков! 🎰 Более 2000 увлекательных игр от 25 лицензированных провайдеров! ⚡ Моментальный вывод выигрыша! 🔒 Без регистрации. Начните игру в два клика прямо в меседжере! 🔥 Присоединяйтесь к эре iGaming вместе с @JetTon и …
🚀 Rocket-чек на 16 TON (38.1$) Внутри чека: 1600 активация(й) по 0.008 TON (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.002 TON (0.005$)
🚀 Rocket-чек на 50 TON (126.4$) Внутри чека: 1000 активация(й) по 0.04 TON (0.1$) с реферальной наградой 0.01 TON (0.03$) 💬 Рассказал на канале про DEX и кошелёк от Дурова Ну и о следующей интеграции ТОН 💎 в телеграм
🚀 Rocket-чек на 360.75 DHD (0.8$) Внутри чека: 47 активация(й) по 6.5 DHD (0.01$) с реферальной наградой 3.25 DHD (0.007$) 💬 沒領到的再來一次，當然這個轉出有點麻煩，建議利用內建的交易所換成Ton就好
🚀 Rocket-чек на 1046.25 JETTON (1,220.3$) Внутри чека: 2790 активация(й) по 0.3 JETTON (0.3$) с реферальной наградой 0.075 JETTON (0.09$) 💬 Welcome to @JetTon
🚀 Rocket-чек на 50 TON (121.5$) Внутри чека: 1000 активация(й) по 0.04 TON (0.10$) с реферальной наградой 0.01 TON (0.02$) 💬 Премиум боты сосать тоже
🚀 Rocket-чек на 150 TON (365.0$) Внутри чека: 1000 активация(й) по 0.1 TON (0.2$) с реферальной наградой 0.05 TON (0.1$) 💬 Приглашаем всех оценить нашу новую каптчу 🚀
Давно не было постов для вас😱 Рассказываю вам сервис, который лучше чем чеки на тоне) Это Зили! A.k.A. Zealy! Но как же там заработать? Все очень просто: Вы следите за разными проектами, и случайно находите BEMO🤩 Bemo.finance , ликвидный стейкинг который заставит ваши деньги работать! Ликвидный стейкинг - это когда ты стейкаешь свои тоны, но так же можешь их использовать, например как поставщик ликвидности😇 Двойной …
🚀 Rocket-чек на 10.05 TON (12.0$) Внутри чека: 134 активация(й) по 0.05 TON (0.06$) с реферальной наградой 0.025 TON (0.03$) 💬 Подпишись на мой канал. Стартует топовый проект для заработка TON. https://t.me/digitalgold999 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
🚀 Rocket-чек на 32715 DHD (40.1$) Один чек: 7.5 DHD (0.009$) Активации: 2181 Реферальная награда: 7.5 DHD (0.009$) Могут активировать только подписчики: TON Rocket Drops Glaza Satoshi 🌟 Только для Telegram Premium
🚀 Rocket-чек на 801840 REDX (925.8$) Один чек: 40 REDX (0.05$) Активации: 13364 Реферальная награда: 20 REDX (0.02$) 💬 В честь запуска своего канала Alex решил раздать немного токенов нашей экосистемы 😏 Прямо сейчас в его канале идёт активное обсуждение токенов, которые могут сделать иксы в ближайшее время Пароль: 100X Могут активировать только подписчики: С. Романов | Держу в ТОНе 100x Crypto 🔺 Чек защищён пар
🚀 Rocket-чек на 1000000 REDX (3,149.7$) Один чек: 5 REDX (0.02$) Активации: 160000 Реферальная награда: 1.25 REDX (0.004$) Могут активировать только подписчики: С. Романов | Держу в ТОНе BIOM P2E
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @google_irl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@google_irl named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чеки по тону!” (@google_irl), 70 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/google_irl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.