Channel
@goodfeelingsbloom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 13 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004490720199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goodfeelingsbloom |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goodfeelingsbloom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 16 | +2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:22 | 14 | no change |
| 13 Oct 2026, 02:47 | 14 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 2 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (2 October 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 298 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 03:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
پدیده‌ی عکاسی از گربه‌های لباس‌پوش، بیش از هر کسی مدیون هری ویتیر فریز (Harry Whittier Frees) است؛ عکاسی آمریکایی که بین سال‌های ۱۹۰۵ تا ۱۹۵۰ فعالیت می‌کرد و به نوعی پدرخوانده‌ی «میم‌های گربه‌ای» مدرن به شمار می‌رود. ماجرا از یک مهمانی تولد در سال ۱۹۰۵ شروع شد. مهمان‌ها یک کلاه کاغذی را روی سر گربه‌ی خانگی گذاشتند و فریز از آن لحظه عکس گرفت. آن عکس چنان محبوب شد که به یک کارت پستال پرفروش تبدیل شد و مسیر شغلی او را …
زمانی که «بلندی‌های بادگیر» در سال ۱۸۴۷ منتشر شد طوفانی از سردرگمی، انزجار و حیرتِ در دوران ویکتوریا را ایجاد کرد 💫شایع‌ترین واکنش، شوک و انزجار بود. بسیاری از منتقدان این کتاب را مایه‌ی شرم می‌دانستند. 💫 مجله آمریکایی «پترسون» تشبیه گویایی داشت: «خواندن این کتاب مثل بیرون آمدن از یک بخش قرنطینه‌ی طاعون است. توصیه ما این است: جین ایر را بخوانید، اما بلندی‌های بادگیر را بسوزانید.» 💫 رمان‌های دوره ویکتوریا معمول…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
بافت فرهنگی کملوت: نمایش موزیکال "کملوت" (۱۹۶۰) یکی از درخشان‌ترین آثار تاریخ برادوی است که داستان شاه آرتور و شوالیه‌های میز گرد را روایت می‌کند. جولی اندروز در اوج جوانی و شکوفایی هنری‌اش در نقش گوئینویر (ملکه‌ی افسانه‌ای) بازی کرد. این عکس‌ها نه فقط زیبایی چهره‌ی او، بلکه آن حس امید و جادوی زنده‌ی تئاتر دهه ۶۰ را به تصویر می‌کشد.
۱. توهم دوران طلایی: بسیاری تصور می‌کنند دهه ۱۹۵۰ بهشت بدن‌های طبیعی بود. اما واقعیت این است که در همان دوران نیز زنان برای رسیدن به آن اندام ساعت‌شنی، تحت فشارهای شدیدی بودند. استفاده از کرست‌های بسیار سفت و محکم (Girdles)، رژیم‌های سخت، قرص‌های لاغری خطرناک و حتی جراحی‌های پلاستیک اولیه، ابزارهایی بودند که زنان برای شبیه شدن به مریلین مونرو استفاده می‌کردند. مریلین مونرو خودش نمادی از یک استاندارد دست‌نیافتنی بود ک…
«زیبای خفته» نزدیک به یک دهه طول کشید تا توسط تیم والت ساخته شود و وقتی در نهایت اکران شد، نزدیک به یک میلیون دلار برای شرکت ضرر داشت (ضرری بسیار بزرگ و فاجعه بار برای آن زمان). ما هرگز شاهکار انیمیشنی دیگری شبیه به این نمیبینیم و هرگز هم نخواهیم دید.
Carl Gustav Carus
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @goodfeelingsbloom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Good feelings” (@goodfeelingsbloom), 16 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodfeelingsbloom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.