Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 07:19
64
+1
9 Sept 2026, 05:15
63
+1
23 Aug 2026, 23:16
62
-1
15 Aug 2026, 15:57
63
+1
10 Aug 2026, 04:01
62
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:46
62
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
374 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
142
38.0%
🏆
87
23.3%
👍
59
15.8%
😱
38
10.2%
🍾
35
9.36%
🤣
13
3.48%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
77
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 19 we hold a reading for · 89%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goodbillionsclub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 April 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨 PFLICHT FÜR JEDEN, DER AUS DEM SYSTEM AUSBRECHEN WILL.
Wer hier bereits aus dem klassischen System ausgebrochen ist – oder tief in sich spürt, dass vieles nicht so läuft, wie es uns verkauft wird:
Schaut euch diesen Podcast mit Andrew Tate an. Komplett. 💯
Nehmt euch einen Abend Zeit. Die Aussagen über Macht, Strukturen und Korruption sind teilweise schockierend.
🧠 Nicht alles glauben. Selbst denken. Hinterfrage…
🚀 Geduld schlägt FOMO.
Am 12. Juni 2026 wollten gefühlt alle nur eins: sofort in die SpaceX-Aktie einsteigen. Die Euphorie war riesig, die Emotionen noch größer.
Wir haben bewusst nicht gekauft, sondern abgewartet.
Und was ist passiert? Der Markt hat genau das getan, was er nach solchen Hype-Phasen oft macht: eine deutliche Korrektur.
💡 Die Lektion daraus: Nicht jeder Zug muss am ersten Tag bestiegen werden. Die …
👀 Wie viel von unserer Zukunft steht eigentlich schon auf dem Tisch?
Dieses Bild ist das Cover von The World Ahead 2026 vom Economist.
Viele Menschen glauben, es seien bloß Zeichnungen. Andere sehen darin eine Art Roadmap der Themen, die die globale Elite bereits Monate oder Jahre im Voraus diskutiert.
🔍 Was entdeckt ihr, wenn ihr bei diesem Bild genauer hinseht? Welche Symbole, Ereignisse oder Botschaften springe…
💰 Every Day Is Payday im goodBillions-Club 💰
Ich wünsche euch allen ein fantastisches Wochenende, genießt eure Zeit und lasst eure Renditen für euch arbeiten. 🚀☀️
Hey Freunde, wie geht’s euch?
Erstmal riesige Gratulation an jeden Einzelnen, der jetzt seit über 3 Wochen bei “Farming Factory” dabei ist und täglich seine vollautomatischen Renditen genießt 💰
👉 Am Freitag droppen wir die offiziellen Zahlen, wie viel Rendite wir im ersten Monat generiert haben – ohne Markt zu predicten, sondern einfach nur durch Lot - Farming.
Und das Beste:
Hier kommen bald noch weitere spannen…
🚀 Na ihr Lieben, wie geht’s euch? 🚀
Hier war jetzt mal eine Woche etwas ruhiger – aber im Hintergrund passiert gerade richtig viel 👀
🔥 Unsere Webseite geht voraussichtlich innerhalb der nächsten 24h live
🔥 Neue EA-Version wurde übers Wochenende auf die PAMM gespielt – noch mehr Stabilität & Sicherheit
Und das Wichtigste:
Glückwunsch an jeden Einzelnen zu euren täglichen Earnings 🪙
Denn auch wenn hier mal nichts g…
🚨 FARMING FACTORY UPDATE 🚨
Liebe Community, diese Woche bleibt alles wie gehabt – gleiches Risiko, gleiche Lotgröße wie letzte Woche.
Grund: NFP-Week = starke News 📉⚠️
Ab nächster Woche gehen wir mit neuer EA-Version & etwas mehr Lot wieder stärker in den Markt 🚀
Bis dahin: genießt die passiven Profite auf Autopilot 💸
Back at home 🏝️
Wünsch euch eine erfolgreiche Woche ☀️
🔥16😱5🏆4🍾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @goodbillionsclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“goodBillions Club” (@goodbillionsclub), 64 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodbillionsclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.