💬开启新评论区, 禁止评论区发机场机器人链接、频道连接,请各位不要再发需要邀请别人的机场机器人链接了谢谢合作,同时禁止同一评论区重复评论发送, 公益机场主们请发网站链接、网站链接、网站链接。

Channel
公益机场➕TG代理收集分享
@gongyijichangfenxiang
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,299subscribers
-230 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001222627051 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gongyijichangfenxiang |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gongyijichangfenxiang |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 8,299 | -25 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 8,324 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:42 | 8,337 | -21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 8,358 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 8,370 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:34 | 8,387 | -19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 8,406 | -23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 8,429 | -18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 8,447 | -20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 8,467 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 8,478 | -15 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 8,493 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 8,514 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 8,527 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 8,529 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 30 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 94.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💬开启新评论区, 禁止评论区发机场机器人链接、频道连接,请各位不要再发需要邀请别人的机场机器人链接了谢谢合作,同时禁止同一评论区重复评论发送, 公益机场主们请发网站链接、网站链接、网站链接。
Posted without readable text
💬开启20条新评论区, 禁止评论区发机场机器人链接、频道连接,请各位不要再发需要邀请别人的机场机器人链接了谢谢合作,同时禁止同一评论区重复评论发送, 公益机场主们请发网站链接、网站链接、网站链接。
===== 评论区 ===== 南鸢: 代理 Gilberto Sapphi...: 代理 右哼哼 ゛: (➤Gilberto Sapphi...) 链接 𝓠𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓡𝓸𝓾^꒦ິ^꒦ິ: 代理
💬开启20条新评论区, 禁止评论区发机场机器人链接、频道连接,请各位不要再发需要邀请别人的机场机器人链接了谢谢合作,同时禁止同一评论区重复评论发送, 公益机场主们请发网站链接、网站链接、网站链接。
❤1
===== 评论区 ===== 我己奔3还没2够 cen: 机油 Gshd Nfjd: 机场 小学当过校长: 代理 小 酒: @jogle_channel_bot
💬开启20条新评论区, 禁止评论区发机场机器人链接、频道连接,请各位不要再发需要邀请别人的机场机器人链接了谢谢合作,同时禁止同一评论区重复评论发送, 公益机场主们请发网站链接、网站链接、网站链接。
===== 评论区 ===== cat神: 机场 关我啥事: @jogle_channel_bot 关我啥事: 机场 挚爱: 网站链接 李 可: 代理 小陆 🚀: 代理 猫 猫: 代理 挼 挼: 订阅
💬开启20条新评论区, 禁止评论区发机场机器人链接、频道连接,请各位不要再发需要邀请别人的机场机器人链接了谢谢合作,同时禁止同一评论区重复评论发送, 公益机场主们请发网站链接、网站链接、网站链接。
===== 评论区 ===== George Bruin: 节点 繁琐: @jogle_channel_bot贴点 繁琐: 节点 Biswanath Murmu: 网站链接 Biswanath Murmu: (➤Biswanath Murmu) 网站链接 Biswanath Murmu: 网站链接 Clown Adnlil: (➤Biswanath Murmu) 节点 kopko kopko: 节点 求: kopko kopko 恩旭: 网站链接
❤6
💬开启20条新评论区, 禁止评论区发机场机器人链接、频道连接,请各位不要再发需要邀请别人的机场机器人链接了谢谢合作,同时禁止同一评论区重复评论发送, 公益机场主们请发网站链接、网站链接、网站链接。
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @gongyijichangfenxiang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“公益机场➕TG代理收集分享” (@gongyijichangfenxiang), 8,299 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gongyijichangfenxiang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.