Channel
@golub_cat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,974subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001620316812 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @golub_cat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/golub_cat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,974 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 1,975 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 1,977 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 1,980 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 1,978 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 1,979 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 1,981 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 1,980 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
287 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 108 | 37.6% | |
| ❤ | 100 | 34.8% | |
| custom 5445317742989157834 | 28 | 9.76% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 6.97% | |
| 😍 | 16 | 5.57% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 3.14% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.697% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пропала ненадолго , тк сейчас пишу большую картину Снимала шопсик по гуаши , заодно решила сделать туториал 🌞 Не теряйте🤝 Меня много в сторьках в инсте✨ #туториал
❤46custom 544531774298915783411❤🔥10
Signed Golub_cat
🌿🕊️🌞Процессное, очень люблю именно этот этап,когда работа начинает оцветняться, но еще видно слой имприматуры #артворк
❤🔥38😍16🔥13❤7custom 54453177429891578341
Signed Golub_cat
Вчера была отсылочка на Нолана сегодня мне не дают покоя лавры Тарантино😌💅 Первые выкраски масла Малевич True pigments 🍎Это новое масло из серии Tician . Но измененным составом. Все пигменты современные и светостойкие . Краска очень хорошо пигментирована, легко разносится и дает чистые замесы (пока я успела выполнить только выкраски) За счет пигментированности расход очень низкий.Что приятно. Когда разводишь пинен…
❤🔥21❤7💘6custom 54453177429891578345👀1👎1🗿1
Signed Golub_cat
Разрешите, я на вас дуну?🌟🤗 Продолжаю свой челлендж в инсте нас уже 727! (абсолютно запрещенная в РФ организация,он и Мета тоже,вдруг вы не знали,я обязана предупредить ) Сейчас пишу картину,буду делиться процессным и выкрасила масло Малевичей , сделала красивое вступление, завтра все увидите✨ 📈В актуальном «статистика»все о том,как начинала и что делала. Сначала в первые 30 дней инст не показывал контент никому,…
❤30❤🔥10custom 54453177429891578346💘3👀1👎1🗿1
Signed Golub_cat
Акварель «Нева» За такой щедрый подгон благодарю подписчицу Татьяну🥰 Акварель досталась от дедушки. Все ж таки она моложе 70 лет( в видео распаковке я допустила ошибку) В комментариях на ютуб Сергей Артистерик сказал,что дизайн посвежее,чем 70 лет Часть туб были треснувшие, с засохшей краской, пришлось сломать их и переложить краску кюветы,развелась водой она , к слову , прекрасно Кое-где отслоилось связующее,но,в…
❤🔥29❤10🔥7custom 54453177429891578345
Signed Golub_cat
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @golub_cat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 478,999 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Golub_cat” (@golub_cat), 1,974 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/golub_cat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.