надо было конечно ей позвонить как нибудь после выхода на пенсию… а теперь у меня от нее осталась только чудесная история о том как она наблюдала гало с крыши какого-то исландского дедулечки
🍓1🐳1💘1🤡1🙏1
Signed alice

Channel
@golofnhalen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001659505140 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @golofnhalen |
| Description | алиса ретроградная безбожно флудит cr. https://t.me/fuyubambi |
| Created | 28 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/golofnhalen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 81 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 81 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (27 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 551 |
| Reactions total | 108 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
108 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 22.2% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5208631174867466927 | 10 | 9.26% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 9.26% | |
| 🤡 | 9 | 8.33% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5208661707789978236 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5422593698091253966 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 1.85% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @golofnhalen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
надо было конечно ей позвонить как нибудь после выхода на пенсию… а теперь у меня от нее осталась только чудесная история о том как она наблюдала гало с крыши какого-то исландского дедулечки
🍓1🐳1💘1🤡1🙏1
Signed alice
хотя я вру перечитать сагу о сожженном ньяле и вообще обложиться сагами обеими эддами и статьями ольги александровны это мое базовое желание сейчас
🍓1🐳1💘1🤡1🙏1
Signed alice
оцените от одного до ста идею предложить скандинавскому семинару посмотреть сагу о винланде параллельно с изучением литературного материала если мне станет Совсем тяжело перечитывать 600 страниц саги о сожженном ньяле
custom 52086311748674669274❤1🐳1💘1🤡1
Signed alice
ни разу не смотрела ни одни сумерки но вот только что подумала а зачем мне сумерки для наполнения постироничной ностальгией если я гордо ностальгирую по этой Имбе
❤4🙏2🍾1🐳1👾1💘1🤡1🦄1
Signed alice
каким все таки правильным решением было зашарить за блич до релиза ткв а то если бы мне пришлось смотреть его сейчас чтобы понять че там такое происходит я бы Сдохла а так да родная помоечка хайпует счастлива за нее как за саму себя (а гримнеллы как будто реально канон вы гонитееее)
❤3custom 52086617077899782362🐳1💘1🤡1🦄1
Signed alice
дачное красивое (да мне скоро 25 теперь все будут смотреть на то какие у нас выросли георгины)
🕊7custom 52086311748674669276custom 52086617077899782364❤2🍾1🐳1👾1🤡1
Signed alice
Науки юношей питают Дотторе 18, Дотторе 20 (Вебторе), Дотторе 25 х Панталоне При поддержке моей дорогой коллеги с химического факультета я наконец-то дописала текст, в котором очень много осмыслила как аспирантка: и о написании статей, и о том, что есть научный текст, и, в особенности, как важно не критиковать наших молодых коллег, а продуктивно взаимодействовать с ними. Наверное, именно за возможность такого взаимо…
❤4🐳1🤡1🦄1
Signed alice
потому что даже е6 бабка не так прекрасна как е4 шеньхэ бесплатно
🙏4❤1🍓1🐳1💘1🤡1🦄1
Signed alice
неиронично спустя 3? 4? года вне гашни я планирую ее скачать чтобы забрать е4 шеньхэ бесплатно
🙏4❤1🍓1🐳1💘1🤡1🦄1
Signed alice
что ж, пришло и мое время сказать несколько хороших слов о 我们最近的北京旅行 я так много раз за последние три недели сказала, что я уже четвертый раз в пекине и он не перестает меня удивлять и открываться с новой стороны, что надо придумать что-нибудь другое, лучше. а самое лучшее в том, что все это время мне хотелось этот город, эти места, ставшие мне чем-то щемяще-близким, показать самому близкому мне человеку. прожить и…
❤8custom 54225936980912539663🍓2🐳1💘1🦄1custom 52086617077899782361
Signed alice
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @golofnhalen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 495,146 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“кто кричал” (@golofnhalen), 81 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/golofnhalen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.