Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

alma libre

@goldenkhaje

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

140subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003534123194
TypeChannel
Username@goldenkhaje
Descriptionletting the plot surprise me for once https://t.me/NoronChat_bot?start=sec-baibigiabe @Mahdokhtandherfriendsbot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/goldenkhaje

Growth

1381401397 August 2026 — 138 subscribers8 August 2026 — 140 subscribers8 August 2026 — 140 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138–140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 22:17140no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:56140+2
7 Aug 2026, 02:03138first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 140 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.1
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total363
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
85
Videos
45
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5415634055775401759832.0%
custom 5411240695073620957520.0%
custom 5413355421006049748520.0%
custom 5415738002573898912520.0%
custom 541569509585061141514.00%
custom 541590955215763666114.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026

هیچی نمیخوام فقط عشق مرام معرفت صمیمیت

8 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @yxallda

فور کنید اینجا حتما جوین باشید!🌟 🌟تا برای چند تا چنل استارز بزنم و رندوم برای دو نفر تعرفه بزارم. Limit: 2450 شدن اینجا

8 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC13 viewsread 8 August 2026

اولین باریه که تو زندگیم حس میکنم این که ادم پارتی داشته باشه چقدر خوشبختت میکنه

8 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTCviews —

alma libre pinned «لویی شخص ارزشمندی تو زندگی منه. یه دوست خیلی ارزشمند که از دل خیلی از سختی‌ها پیداش کردم این بچه انگار جلوی چشم خودم داره بزرگ میشه. حالا توی تیک تاک و تلگرام چنل داره و خیلی قشنگن ادیت هاش. حتما ببینید بهش ری اکت بدید و جوین شید.»

8 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherryxarchiveVideo

𓂃 ✦ 𝑫𝖺𝖽𝖽𝗒 𝑷𝖺𝗋𝗄, 𝑫𝖺𝖽𝖽𝗒 𝑪𝖺𝗋? 𓂃 #Chanyeol 🍒 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗒𝗑 ؛ 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾 ؛ 𝗈𝗇︎ 𝗍𝗂𝗄︎𝗍𝗈𝗄︎

custom 54156340557754017591

8 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherryxarchiveVideo

𓂃 ✦Maybe he wanted Baekhyun all along 𓂃 #Chanyeol × #Baekhyun 🍒 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗒𝗑 ؛ 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾 ؛ 𝗈𝗇︎ 𝗍𝗂𝗄︎𝗍𝗈𝗄︎

custom 54156340557754017591

8 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherryxarchiveVideo

𓂃 ✦Red hearts,blue souls,purple memories 𓂃 #Chanyeol × #Baekhyun 🍒 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗒𝗑 ؛ 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾 ؛ 𝗈𝗇︎ 𝗍𝗂𝗄︎𝗍𝗈𝗄︎

custom 54133554210060497481

8 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherryxarchiveVideo

𓂃 ✦𝓜𝖺𝗒𝖻𝖾 𝓘 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍 𝓌𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖺 𝒷𝖾 𝓎𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗌 𓂃 #Chanyeol × #Baekhyun 🍒 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗒𝗑 ؛ 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾 ؛ 𝗈𝗇︎ 𝗍𝗂𝗄︎𝗍𝗈𝗄︎

custom 54157380025738989121

8 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherryxarchiveVideo

𓂃 ✦ 𝑰𝖿 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗅, 𝖨'𝗅𝗅 𝖻𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𓂃 #Sehun × #Baekhyun 🍒 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗒𝗑 ؛ 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾 ؛ 𝗈𝗇︎ 𝗍𝗂𝗄︎𝗍𝗈𝗄︎

custom 54159095521576366611

8 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherryxarchiveVideo

𓂃 ✦ 𝑺𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝓂𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗌, 𝒖𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗍𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𓂃 #Xiumin × #Chen 🍒 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗒𝗑 ؛ 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾 ؛ 𝗈𝗇︎ 𝗍𝗂𝗄︎𝗍𝗈𝗄︎

custom 54156950958506114151

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @goldenkhaje. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 54,658 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“alma libre” (@goldenkhaje), 140 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goldenkhaje.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.