Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,940–3,010 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 00:59
3,002
+13
11 Sept 2026, 13:17
2,989
+4
6 Sept 2026, 23:18
2,985
-4
2 Sept 2026, 05:42
2,989
-1
30 Aug 2026, 02:47
2,990
-2
26 Aug 2026, 17:45
2,992
-6
23 Aug 2026, 08:55
2,998
+37
19 Aug 2026, 20:24
2,961
+5
16 Aug 2026, 19:23
2,956
+8
12 Aug 2026, 22:33
2,948
-6
10 Aug 2026, 05:55
2,954
-7
7 Aug 2026, 13:07
2,961
-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:35
2,962
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
68
52.7%
❤🔥
27
20.9%
🔥
12
9.30%
😍
10
7.75%
💔
8
6.20%
custom 5188527455157115424
3
2.33%
👍
1
0.775%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С места в карьер
Первый пункт в плане на эту неделю - определиться с расписанием на осень. Для этого надо проделать большую работу. Сами посудите:
👉 определиться с форматом работы
👉 количеством групп
👉 днями и временем
👉 какими они будут - по учебникам или аутентике?
👉 необычные форматы - подумываю насчет курса язык+методика, надо ли?
👉 как работать - какие платформы, как оплачивать?
👉 какой мессенджер выбрать для …
Отпуск закончился
А желание отдыхать осталось 🤭 Не без этого!
Дочка ушла гулять с бабушкой, а я сижу над открытым файлом и пытаюсь составить контент-план. Погода за окном не способствует мыслительному процессу 😁
Мы с мужем и Зойкой успели побывать на даче у праба, навестить прадеда, съездить к моему папе, погулять по Москве, а еще слетали в Баку на несколько дней. Азербайджан прекрасен ✨ Поделюсь фотографиями с ва…
Доход или дело по любви?
У меня постоянно возникают новые идеи: то я хочу разговорный клуб, то сделать курс по фильмам, то всякие разные проекты для преподавателей. Думаю, и у вас мелькали такие мысли?
От любви до ненависти идеи до успешного проекта совсем не шаг...
Вместе с Дарьей Тарасовой поговорили о том, как рождаются проекты, почему некоторые из них неожиданно становятся успешными, а другие приходится закрыв…
Как найти свой крючок?
Мы записали этот подкаст еще в марте. Он ждал своего часа, и вот в эти выходные я готова им с вами поделиться.
Когда мы готовились к записи, моя гостья написала мне такую классную фразу: "Хочу рассказать о том, что если глаза горят и хочется попробовать что-то уникальное, то надо делать! Ну а если еще не знаешь, что запустить, то надо найти тот самый крючок!" 😍
И так мне понравилась эта фраз…
Интенсив еще не закончился, а у меня уже продажа на следующий поток, шок!
Не устаю благодарить себя за то, что перестала откладывать свои идеи на потом. Стараюсь жить в моменте и не упускать возможности, и я безумно рада, что стала следовать этому простому правилу.
Радуюсь, что первый поток совсем не комом, как первый блинчик 🤭 Хотя, конечно, идеи по улучшению у меня уже есть. Буду воплощать их осенью 🥰
До 3 авгус…
Заметила за собой крайнее раздражение от казалось бы уже привычных вещей.
Не могу войти в колею с соцсетями - владею всеми инструментами, есть аккаунты, есть аудитория, но бляха муха, на улице у нас вечно интернета нет, а с маленьким ребенком сидеть летом дома - кощунство! В телеграм зайти вечный квест с этими квнами даже дома с работающим вай-фаем.
Прямо сейчас сижу в кофейне и пытаюсь поработать. Тг грузится прим…
❤16💔8
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @godsaveenglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
eng books • collection @englishbooks_collection · 66,600 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“God_save_English 💜 методика” (@godsaveenglish), 3,002 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/godsaveenglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.