Кому интересно, Все адекватные неадекваты тут Да да вот прям тут Ну тут же… https://t.me/web34me
🔥1
Signed Имя Есть

Channel
@goblin_production
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002603287707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goblin_production |
| Description | Канал надежный, как швейцарские часы блять! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 26 April 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goblin_production |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 30 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 21 | 30.9% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 26.5% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 10.3% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5197462546205929410 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 4.41% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.47% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2025 to 13 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кому интересно, Все адекватные неадекваты тут Да да вот прям тут Ну тут же… https://t.me/web34me
🔥1
Signed Имя Есть
Fallout намечается?🤩 Нахуй такие шуточки, я в бункер🫡
🔥2
CZ, KG & BNB Нихуевый салат на фото, из натурального продукта только киргиз-водила в очках на заднем фоне👌 На фото: китайский канадец у немецкого авто с киргизскими номерами на фоне русских берез🤔 CZ предложил BNB и BTC в качестве одних из стартовых валют для национального крипто-резерва Кыргызстана. По сути вот вам ахуенный стартап! Покупаем любой авто в рандомной стране, ищем «заебись» цифра-буквы связанные с к…
custom 51974625462059294103
Канал пиздатый…читателей мало. Все на подарках залипают…
💯1
Signed Юджин Дрим Тим
Джедонни ахуителен как никогда💪 Белый дом опубликовал в X изображение президента Дональда Трампа в стиле джедая, держащего световой меч, с подписью: «Счастливого 4 мая всем, включая радикальных левых лунатиков, которые так упорно борются за возвращение в нашу Галактику лордов ситхов, убийц, наркобаронов, опасных заключённых и членов банды MS-13. Вы не Восстание — вы Империя. Да пребудет с вами 4-е».
😁3
Похуй - ньюс 🆕 CoinGecko заморочились и выдали разбор полётов по крипте. С 2021 года было запущено 7 🍋 коинов, а 3,7 🍋 из них уже умерло! Это 52,7% всей криптошняги! Особо лютый пиздец пришёлся на 2024 и начало 2025 года. В первом квартале 2025 рекорд - 1,8 ляма проектов накрылось, это почти половина всех мертвяков! 🚫 Вот расклад по годам, сколько коинов лёгло ебалом в грязь: - 2021: 2584 шмаля - 2022: 213 075 туш…
🔥5
РОЖДЕННЫЙ В ТЕНИ И В ТЕМНЫЙ ДЕНЬ, ОН БУДЕТ ВЛАСТЕН В ЦАРСТВЕ И ДОБРЕ: ОН ЗАСТАВИТ СВОЮ КРОВЬ СНОВА ВОСКРЕСНУТЬ В ДРЕВНЕЙ УРНЕ, ВОЗОБНОВИВ ЗОЛОТОЙ ВЕК ДЛЯ МОНЕТ. ©️ Нострадамус Вот такая вот хуйня👌
⚡3🔥2😁1
А ну сознавайся сука!🖥 По мнению Чангпена (CZ) биткоин МОЖЕТ быть «творчеством» ахуевшего компьютера (ИИ) из будущего, который решил всех дрочкануть и посмотреть что из этого выйдет👌 "Это может быть программное обеспечение, возвращающееся через время… Это трудно представить сейчас, но это может быть возможно" "Я не знаю, кто он. Я никогда не взаимодействовал с ним. Я знаю людей, которые это делали (в первые дни)...…
👀4
Так лучше👌
😁6💯3
Саня очнись - ты обосрался!💩 Пока «мамкины криптоэнтузиасты» берут втихаря на батьку кредит, чтоб купить кепку да пепку, кудрявый спиздил штаны у Бильбо Бэггинса и впаривает очередную «топ» тапалку, которая побьет нахуй все рекорды и привлекет ебейшее колличестко человек! ( +- столько же смотрит прямую трансляцию)▶️ Ахуенный мув! Так держать! To the moon shit! 💩 Маркет? Нахуй маркет! Денег дайте заебали….
💩6🔥3😁3
Любой пацанский паблик - разлогинься
Signed Юджин Дрим Тим
Соон блять! 🔜 Нихуя ни на что не намекаю, но война не избежна🥊 А если она не избежна - нужно бежать бить первым🥊 - Если ты плюнешь на коллектив - коллектив утрется, если коллектив плюнет на тебя - ты утонешь👌
🔥5💯3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @goblin_production. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 520,148 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@goblin_production named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Goblin Production🥊” (@goblin_production), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goblin_production.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.