Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

gobihc

@gobchs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

214subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003475321301
TypeChannel
Username@gobchs
DescriptionОдна хуйня тут, подписываемся, ловим + вайбик и давайте бустим https://t.me/boost/gobchs
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/gobchs

Growth

2148 Aug 2026, 21:02 — 214 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:15 — 214 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:028 Aug 2026, 21:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 213–215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:15214no change
8 Aug 2026, 21:02214first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
103.8%
avg views ÷ 214 subscribers
Avg views / post
222
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (10 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,888
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
82
Links
39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

142 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52156315248833667023524.6%
custom 52426078193325586372517.6%
custom 52855341362603929892517.6%
custom 53101395271578148801913.4%
custom 5325640059834100782117.75%
custom 5296603774515707726107.04%
custom 526028169135994661196.34%
custom 525392147615478924853.52%
custom 529657932326689511310.704%
custom 530074301059250855410.704%
🕊10.704%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gobchs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52539214761547892483

7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC61 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Реакции поменял ☺. Короче соре ,что так долго меня небыло, слишком много чего свалилось : то расставание,то всякие болячки обнаружились из за чего часто в больницу ходить буду , то с бывшими друзьями пытался контакт наладить 💀

custom 52966037745157077269custom 52539214761547892482

7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC66 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

15.8.26❤️

custom 52426078193325586379custom 52965793232668951131custom 52966037745157077261

22 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC308 views4 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52426078193325586374

22 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC305 views2 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

Хз норм ли,но вы скажите пожалуйста,прост не согу в последнее время норм писать зарисовки изза стройки

custom 53101395271578148802

22 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC300 views21 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💜🤍🤍💜🤍🤍 🤍💜🤍🤍💜🤍💜 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🔤асть - читать _____ #зарисовка #кшнц

custom 52156315248833667029custom 53101395271578148805custom 52602816913599466114🕊1custom 53007430105925085541custom 53256400598341007821

22 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC226 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мож хотябы 4 часть дропнуть ,чтобы скучно вам небыло? А то не годятся,мне не нравится ,что все так

custom 52426078193325586377

19 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC306 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53256400598341007825

19 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTC297 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Надеюсь ,что скор все напишу ,а пока по тихоньку все пишу пока есть время и возможность Всех вас лю 🥺,надеюсь ,что скоро вернусь и как у вас каникулы проходят? Раз уж дело пошло

custom 52855341362603929895

19 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC265 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52855341362603929895

19 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC228 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я прям пизд ,как уже хочу написать зарисовку,выб знали скок идей у меня уже есть

custom 52855341362603929894

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @gobchs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 265,693 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“gobihc” (@gobchs), 214 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gobchs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.