Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 上海、福利(大尺度)

Channel

上海、福利(大尺度)

@gndthg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,994subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003139564290
TypeChannel
Username@gndthg
Created24 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gndthg

Growth

1,9751,9941,984.56 August 2026 — 1,975 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,975 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,982 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,994 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,972–1,997 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:461,994+12
10 Aug 2026, 04:121,982+7
7 Aug 2026, 01:061,975no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:461,975first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 24 September 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.8%
avg views ÷ 1,994 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.261%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held9 (24 September 202530 July 2026)
Views total8,103
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 05:36 UTC723 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

昵称:杨幂儿 地区:#拱墅 课费:15p 25pp 联系:@tianzai520_bot 我不是骚,只是心怀天下想让更多的单身男人得到性福…… 🔖 报告 评论区自提 大尺度视频 【杨幂儿01】【杨幂儿02】【杨幂儿03】【杨幂儿04】

3

26 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,290 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

昵称:樂樂 地区:#普陀 课费:600p 900pp 联系:@wxhn1995 🔖 报告 评论区自提 【樂樂01】大尺度视频

3

26 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

昵称:颜如玉 地区:#普陀 课费:1000p 1500pp 联系:@xiaoamei5200 🔖 报告 评论区自提 【颜如玉01】大尺度视频

26 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

昵称:林咻咻 地区:#长宁 课费:1000p 1800pp 联系:@xiuxiu698 🔖 报告 评论区自提 大尺度视频 【林咻咻01】【林咻咻02】【林咻咻03】

26 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC974 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

昵称:安娜 地区:#浦东 课费:600p 1100pp 联系:@anabibi1999520 🔖 报告 评论区自提 大尺度视频 【安娜01】【安娜02】【安娜03】

4

26 Jul 2026, 03:57 UTC906 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

昵称:馨馨 地区:#普陀 课费:600p 1000pp 联系:@My130z 🔖 报告 评论区自提 【馨馨01】大尺度视频

25 Jul 2026, 05:06 UTC≈1,040 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

昵称:闪闪(极品奶妈) 地区:#上海 #静安 课费:1600p 2500pp 联系:@zxc199511 🔖 报告 评论区自提 【闪闪01】【闪闪02】【闪闪03】大尺度视频

1

25 Jul 2026, 04:44 UTC960 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

昵称:贝贝 地区:#浦东 课费:1200p 2000pp 联系:@pudongbeibei12 🔖 报告 评论区自提 【贝贝01】大尺度视频

2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @gndthg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,096,234 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“上海、福利(大尺度)” (@gndthg), 1,994 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gndthg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.