Channel
@gmakcrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,819subscribers
+131 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001232519715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gmakcrypto |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gmakcrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 3,819 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 3,818 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 3,810 | +18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 3,792 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 3,795 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 3,797 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 3,792 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 3,789 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 3,781 | +92 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 3,689 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 3,688 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 3,688 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 17.9% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
bought some $IDLE - can see it doing same run $zero did legit project backed by @Alchemy via $20m solana fund and fits current narrative perfectly. https://dexscreener.com/solana/dnag61icscefsqbeir9fcdkq92layzmyewiszw3aswmn
Stick around and you’ll make it: https://x.com/gMAKcrypto/status/2063979086200857009?s=20
Bought some $AEON too
Bidding some $SURPLUS here at 5.5m mcap
$NOCK doing it’s thing right now… https://x.com/gMAKcrypto/status/2060724997392326882?s=20
Just base trenching and bought $BRAIN - 0x7ff2b3a09755fb38bc8334c2c05173f75fd4dba3 damonnam the founder: • Ex-Microsoft, years in crypto/blockchain • Scheduled to talk with Bankr team on Monday regarding community token • Explicitly said he wants this product to one day be backed by coinbase ventures HERE My research bot found $aeon and $surplus before they hit a 10x and showed me this. (Criteria is usually doxxed …
❤1
$CODEC please break 🙏
🙏3
https://x.com/gMAKcrypto/status/2056350371992175087?s=20
$ROBO > $0.3 soon.
🔥1
$nock running whilst privacy meta in motion. still 4x away from new ATHs + phase 2 live with tripled block speed post halving + protocol fund. https://x.com/gMAKcrypto/status/2052678568438546674?s=20
I also bought some $CODEC on solana since it’s the main robotics infra play + team has been continually working this past year + pumpfun hackathon winner (6th place) with $200k grant. Seem as though they’ll be lining up a few announcements (operator markets for AI robot skills)+ marketing campaign over the next 30 days.
👍2❤1
+25% on $ROBO from strong support around .18 Hoping to find new support here above .22 Robotics, as expected, coming back into flavour once again and theres a lot of thin air above .25
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @gmakcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gmakcrypto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“gMAK Crypto” (@gmakcrypto), 3,819 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gmakcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.