Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GM Labs

Channel

GM Labs

@gm_labs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,461subscribers

-249 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001876518255
TypeChannel
Username@gm_labs
DescriptionWWFR | NFA links t.me/gmlbslounge
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gm_labs

Growth

22,46122,71022,585.511 August 2026 — 22,710 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,710 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,696 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,671 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,652 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,634 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,620 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,603 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,592 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,575 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,551 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,530 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,508 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,488 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,461 subscribers11 August 202627 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -249. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,424–22,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 04:4722,461-27
26 Aug 2026, 03:4322,488-20
25 Aug 2026, 01:2822,508-22
23 Aug 2026, 16:3822,530-21
22 Aug 2026, 01:1722,551-24
20 Aug 2026, 20:1622,575-17
19 Aug 2026, 20:5122,592-11
18 Aug 2026, 17:1722,603-17
17 Aug 2026, 18:1322,620-14
16 Aug 2026, 17:2522,634-18
15 Aug 2026, 01:4722,652-19
13 Aug 2026, 18:1422,671-25
12 Aug 2026, 15:5722,696-14
11 Aug 2026, 20:0022,710no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:4722,710first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
37
Videos
1
Links
51

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2024, 09:43 UTC≈3,150 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

У кого-то ещё остались сомнения? Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

30 Dec 2024, 21:16 UTC≈3,150 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Дамы и господа, массовая отмена по Blum'у На дроп можем не рассчитывать, Смеркис выкатил анонс, сами ознакомьтесь что к чему 😄 *уже с таймкодом Реакция сообщества, мягко говоря, неоднозначная Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

22 Dec 2024, 12:07 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Казахский брат спойлерит дальше 😎 Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

20 Dec 2024, 14:04 UTC≈2,210 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Интересный нынче рынок, хоть мы обычно про это не пишем Цены вкусные, можно брать бОльшую часть уже здесь Лучшая рекомендация из цикла в цикл — только спот и low-leverage И казахский брат подсказывает — скоро что-то будет 🤔 Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

12 Dec 2024, 07:20 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Там кстати пару дней назад акционеры Microsoft голосовали за инвестирование в BTC. Согласны только 0.55% акционеров компании По этому поводу Джастин Сан закинул в твиттер качественную: «Цена BTC недостаточно высока, чтобы Microsoft могли рассматривать его как резерв. Я настоятельно рекомендую купить его, когда BTC достигнет $1млн» Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

10 Dec 2024, 07:59 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Шеф, очевидно, тоже с нами согласен Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

9 Dec 2024, 09:52 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Всё, что вы здесь найдете — через время так или иначе будет стоить гораздо, гораздо больше Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

7 Dec 2024, 20:24 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Вообще мы про это раньше не писали, но догадаться было не трудно — главная ставка в этом цикле останется неизменной Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

6 Dec 2024, 17:57 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 27 August 2026

Пока делали текст про пару интересных монет — наткнулись на некоего зверя $5IRE Помнится, весной на него возлагались большие надежды Сегодня он -95% от пика ☹️👍 Разработчики проекта - индусы, делают свой блокчейн. Аккамуляция больше 100 дней на сумасшедших объемах, всё на графике Если хотите рискнуть — возьмите на то, что не жалко потерять. Апсайд — x10 минимум Не является инвестиционной рекомендацией Labs ⚗️ |

4 Dec 2024, 20:21 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 27 August 2026

Сам BTC, тем временем, уверенно выдвинулся на 100k за штуку До заветной цифры меньше полутора процентов https://www.tradingview.com/x/srSUEwTM/ Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

4 Dec 2024, 20:19 UTC999 viewsread 27 August 2026

Между делом, экстренная новость Джером Пауэлл, Председатель ФРС США, назвал BTC цифровым золотом Теперь следить за гонкой BTC до золота гораздо интереснее 🍸 https://www.tradingview.com/x/6HjAraf/ Labs ⚗️ | Links 🔗

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gm_labs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 768,480 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GM Labs” (@gm_labs), 22,461 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gm_labs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.