Posted without readable text
🔥9custom 53797857075124098305💩3👀1custom 53798881167126158421

Channel
@gm_galactic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,416subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001850255597 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gm_galactic |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gm_galactic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 4,416 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 4,425 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 4,428 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 4,429 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,178 |
| Reactions total | 344 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
344 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5379888116712615842 | 78 | 22.7% | |
| 🔥 | 70 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5379785707512409830 | 44 | 12.8% | |
| 💩 | 41 | 11.9% | |
| 👀 | 24 | 6.98% | |
| 🤯 | 24 | 6.98% | |
| 🤔 | 22 | 6.40% | |
| 🥱 | 20 | 5.81% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 2.91% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 1.16% | |
| custom 5379724336724718579 | 2 | 0.581% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.581% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.581% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.291% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
🔥9custom 53797857075124098305💩3👀1custom 53798881167126158421
Сборник Moss: The Forgotten Relic остался верен оригиналу, предлагая милые анимации, интересные головоломки и приятный визуал. Поэтому поддерживать мышку Квилл интересно даже без VR-гарнитуры. Мышка без VR: Обзор Moss: The Forgotten Relic @gm_galactic
🔥6custom 53797857075124098303custom 53798881167126158423
Официально: Разработчики Gothic 1 Remake анонсируют свой новый проект в 2027 году В рамках довольно скучной THQ Nordic Digital Showcase 2026 студия Alkimia Interactive поделилась своими планами на будущее. Они также поблагодарили игроков за тёплый приём Gothic 1 Remake. Разработчики намерены продолжить выпускать патчи для ремейка, которые будут исправлять баги. Кроме того, готовится выпуск больших обновлений, котор…
🔥9custom 53797857075124098302custom 53798881167126158422👀1💩1🥱1
Если вы продолжали смотреть этот кошмар, то хотим сообщить, что пятый и финальный сезон «Ведьмака» перенесён на 2027 год. @gm_galactic
💩19custom 53798881167126158428🥱3custom 53797857075124098301
Теперь фанаты Overwatch смогут сыграть за... эммм... Димона? @gm_galactic
custom 537988811671261584219👀1💩1🥱1custom 53797857075124098301
Современный маркетинг видеоигр выглядит так. Ну и да — мы живем в реальности, где для просмотра геймплея новой игры теперь требуется оформить подписку на Netflix. Маразм крепчает. @gm_galactic #GTA
custom 537988811671261584226custom 53797857075124098302🌚1💩1🤬1🫡1custom 53797243367247185791
Несмотря на скромный хронометраж серий, «Максимальное удовольствие гарантировано» (Maximum Pleasure Guaranteed) переполнено событиями, а каждый эпизод заканчивается на эффектном клиффхэнгере. Кроме того, в истории постоянно появляются новые лица, что делает повествование более динамичным, а интрига сохраняется. Ну а открытый финал сулит второй сезон. Серая мораль на 30 минут: Обзор сериала «Максимальное удовольствие…
👀8🔥5custom 53797857075124098302💩1🥱1
Самое смешное в атаках на Sony, которая решила отказаться от дисков, — это комментарии в защиту дисков под трейлерами Helldivers 2. Дескать, гордятся тем, что у них есть диски с игрой. Ну вы знаете эту Helldivers 2 — игру-сервис, регулярно обновляющуюся и требующую постоянного онлайн-подключения к серверам, без которого она превращается в картошку. И в дальнейшем она превратится в картошку неизбежно, потому что серв…
custom 537988811671261584219custom 53797857075124098306🤔4💩2🔥2
EA показала постеры с досье на главных персонажей тактической стратегии Star Wars: Zero Company. Игра выходит уже в конце августа. @gm_galactic
👀9🔥4🥱3🤮2custom 53797857075124098302💩1
В Сети считают, что в рамках Qakecon 2026 года Microsoft анонсирует и тут же выпустит ремастер шутера Wolfenstein образца 2009 года, за который отвечала студия Raven Software. @gm_galactic
🔥13🥱5💩2🤡2👀1
Сегодня состоялся релиз Beast of Reincarnation от Game Freak. Только разработчики Pokemon могли додуматься в своей новой игре заблокировать показатель производительности в катсценах на «кинематографичных» 24 кадрах в секунду. Не на 30 кадрах в секунду! На 24! Да, прямо как в мемах. То есть во время катсцен игра начинает тормозить (показатель в 24 кадра нормально работает только если речь идёт об офлайн-рендеринге). …
🤯14🫡4🥱3custom 53797857075124098303💩1
СМИ: Lucasfilm Games разорвала сотрудничество с Aspyr Media Издательский бренд Lucasfilm Games разорвал сотрудничество с компанией Aspyr Media, которая является подразделением Embracer Group. Об этом сообщает издание Star Wars Gaming, которое ссылается на источники блога The Star Wars Garrison. Aspyr Media специализируется на выпуске переизданий и ремастеров различных игр. В частности, она работала с брендами Tomb …
🤔9🫡5custom 53797857075124098303💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @gm_galactic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 184,776 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гамачок Галактики (GameMAG.ru)” (@gm_galactic), 4,416 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gm_galactic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.