Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ׁᵗ᷒ᰰ 𝐺𝑙oss𝑦 𝄒 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟔 💜

@glossycvr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003927348077
TypeChannel
Username@glossycvr
Created6 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/glossycvr

Growth

727372.510 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 72 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:00 — 72 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:46 — 73 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:4611 Aug 2026, 04:46
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:4673+1
10 Aug 2026, 08:0072no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:4672first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54629006733790761842514.8%
custom 53530097904674646052414.2%
custom 57962530439346332832414.2%
custom 54587112248396043372213.0%
custom 57964910280725050602213.0%
custom 5773893603105447230158.88%
🦄158.88%
💘116.51%
🆒63.55%
🐳31.78%
👾21.18%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @glossycvr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 21 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 May 2026, 20:31 UTC164 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🎀🎀 @ Tık T𑄜k 🤩 ׁGl𑄜ss𝑦 ִ۪ upժ𝖺tᥱ 🦄 ⊹. 𝖺uժıtı𑄜n : b𑄜t 🤩🎀

custom 57964910280725050604custom 53530097904674646053custom 54629006733790761843🦄2custom 57738936031054472302custom 57962530439346332832

17 May 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,430 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎀🤩 ִֺ۪ Gl𑄜ss𝑦 @ 𝖺uժıtı𑄜n . 🤍 ✨ 𝂅ׄ 𝅄 ınf𑄜rmatıon comm. 朝 t𝖺ken : h𝖺um ׁ🤩 kıııkııı free : lᥱᥱs𑄜l ' Suı ' Jıyu ' Kyα rᥱsults ın pr𑄜fılᥱ 🎀🤩 . ✦ pr𑄜ժ . b𝑦 @ mur b𑄜t f𑄜r 𝖺uժıtı𑄜n

custom 53530097904674646058custom 57964910280725050604🦄3custom 54587112248396043373custom 54629006733790761843custom 57738936031054472303custom 57962530439346332833💘2

16 May 2026, 19:40 UTC176 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🎀🎀 @ 𝐓ık 𝐓𝗈k 🤩 ׁ𝐺𝑙oss𝑦 ִ۪ upd𝖺tᥱ 🦄 ⊹. 𝖺udıtıon 2𝟎𝟏𝟔 🤩🎀

💘2custom 53530097904674646052custom 54587112248396043372custom 57738936031054472302custom 54629006733790761841custom 57962530439346332831custom 57964910280725050601

15 May 2026, 18:40 UTC255 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎀🤩 ׁᵗ᷒ᰰ ׁ𝐺𝑙oss𝑦 ִ۪ POPCAKE ݂ 🤩 ִֺ۪ 🎀🤩 : POPCAKE опублuковалu матерuал о новой группе 𝐺𝑙oss𝑦. Пока что в офuцuальном телеграмм канале группы, появuлся только тuзер с эстетuкоŭ 2016 года, которыŭ стал намёком на будущую концепцuю проекта. Также сообщается, что в блuжаŭшее время может открыться набор на участнuков. — 🤩 : Статья уже стала одноŭ из

💘7custom 53530097904674646056🦄5custom 54587112248396043373custom 54629006733790761842custom 57738936031054472302custom 57962530439346332832custom 57964910280725050602

14 May 2026, 07:11 UTC263 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 57962530439346332838custom 57964910280725050606🆒4custom 54587112248396043374🦄3custom 57738936031054472303🐳2custom 53530097904674646052

13 May 2026, 18:14 UTC559 views49 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

🎀🤩 ׁᵗ᷒ᰰ ׁ𝐺𝑙oss𝑦 ִ۪ Tᥱ𝖺sᥱr. 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟔 𝄒💙 ִֺ۪ ִֶָ𓏲࣪:𝖺ud𝗶t𝗶on 🤍 ׄ 🎀

custom 546290067337907618414custom 545871122483960433710custom 57962530439346332838custom 57964910280725050604custom 53530097904674646053custom 57738936031054472303👾2🦄2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @glossycvr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 649,032 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ׁᵗ᷒ᰰ 𝐺𝑙oss𝑦 𝄒 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟔 💜” (@glossycvr), 73 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glossycvr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.