t.me/glossycartt
Channel
glossies archive — SUBS @GLOSSYCARTT
@glossycartarchives
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
100subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002937901002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glossycartarchives |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glossycartarchives |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 100 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 101 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 101 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 94.4% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Channel name was changed to «glossies archive — SUBS @GLOSSYCARTT»
Sticker, posted without a caption
username part 3 soon
username part 2 soon
➜ USERNAME ⋆.𐙚 MULCHAR ᯓ @. ᯓ @.sasisten 30k ᯓ @.siweet 375k ᯓ @.marmwot 50k ᯓ @.dsilan 65k ᯓ @.divlne 320k negtip ᯓ @.demokkrasi qyop ᯓ @.sNuasana qyop ᯓ @.suasanaw qyop ᯓ @.cashierh qyop ᯓ @.cAlur qyop ᯓ @.unPiverse qyop ᯓ @.hebats 50K ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ ⋆.𐙚 IDOL ᯓ @.osiyoonbaek 3xk ᯓ @.bsiyoonbaek 3xk ᯓ @. ᯓ @.parkbihu 125k ᯓ @. ᯓ @. ᯓ @.phamntochan qyop ᯓ @.leelgrace qyop ᯓ @.ngbochanpham qyop ⋆.𐙚 FRAG ᯓ @.seonghfwa 38…
Sticker, posted without a caption
➜ ACCSOSMED ⋆.𐙚 TIKTOK ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/1374 65k ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/1488 180k ᯓ ⋆.𐙚 INSTAGRAM ᯓ ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/1505 50k co ᯓ ᯓ ⋆.𐙚 TWITTER ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ
❤6
Sticker, posted without a caption
➜ GIFTUPG ᯓ t.me/nft/SpicedWine-54815 115k nett ᯓ t.me/nft/SkyStilettos-43743 650k nego ᯓ t.me/nft/MousseCake-37566 165k nego ᯓ t.me/nft/JackInTheBox-86413 165k nego ᯓ t.me/nft/PrettyPosy-88566 780k nego ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ
❤3
Sticker, posted without a caption
➜ ACCGAME ⋆.𐙚 ROBLOX ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/1465 180k ᯓ ⋆.𐙚 ZEPETO ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/55 300k nego ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/57 230k nego ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/73 380K nego ⋆.𐙚 FREE FIRE ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/393 190k nego ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/993 50k negtip ⋆.𐙚 MOBILE LEGEND ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/710 250k ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/917 230k ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/1228 400 ᯓ t.me/GlossyCartt/1235 150 ⋆.𐙚 GENSHIN IMPACT ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ ᯓ ⋆.𐙚 …
❤10🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @glossycartarchives. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@glossycartarchives named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“glossies archive — SUBS @GLOSSYCARTT” (@glossycartarchives), 100 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glossycartarchives.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.