Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Трохи про приватне право🧐

Channel

Трохи про приватне право🧐

@glossema

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

11,078subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001531613100
TypeChannel
Username@glossema
DescriptionКанал про приватне право
Created27 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/glossema

Growth

11,07811,08911,083.56 August 2026 — 11,085 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,089 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,087 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,088 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,086 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,084 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,079 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,083 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,086 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,082 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,078 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,076–11,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:4511,078-4
14 Aug 2026, 22:1511,082-4
13 Aug 2026, 16:1611,086+3
12 Aug 2026, 14:1511,083+4
11 Aug 2026, 12:5511,079-5
10 Aug 2026, 13:1511,084-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:0311,086-2
8 Aug 2026, 18:0211,088+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:5111,087-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:0611,089+4
6 Aug 2026, 16:0511,085first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 11,078 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,270
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.483%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held34 (24 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total77,180
Reactions total373
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
305
Videos
84
Links
2,930

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

373 reactions across 34 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17546.9%
👍7018.8%
🔥5314.2%
195.09%
🤔174.56%
😁164.29%
🤩102.68%
👎41.07%
🤯41.07%
🥰41.07%
🥴10.268%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 34 we hold a reading for · 82%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @glossema. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,020 views10 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

♻️Який правовий режим об’єкта, що купується в шлюбі за готівкові кошти одним з подружжям, при продажі у той же самий день особистого майна за готівкові кошти⁉️ Постанова КЦС від 29.07.2026 в справі № 758/1829/24 📗При укладенні угод одним з подружжя вважається, що він діє за згодою другого з подружжя. Для укладення угод по відчуженню спільного майна подружжя, що потребують обов'язкового нотаріального засвідчення, зг

8👍1👎1

16 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,470 views8 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

♻️Трохи про правовий режим греблі Постанова ВП ВС від 15.07.2026 у справі № 915/268/24 1️⃣123. Слід врахувати, що сама по собі кваліфікація об`єкта як нерухомої речі не є достатньою підставою для визнання його самостійним об`єктом цивільного права. Правова природа конкретного об`єкта має визначатися не лише на підставі його фізичних характеристик, але й з урахуванням його функціонального призначення та правового зв

👍8

15 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,600 views16 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

♻️Чи можна забезпечити позов одного з подружжя до іншого з подружжя про стягнення 1/2 частини вартості частки в статутному капіталі товариства шляхом накладення арешту на майно товариства, яке не є відповідачем⁉️ Ухвала КЦС ВС від 29.07.2026 у справі № 755/55/26 ❓Ключовим питанням, що постало в цій справі, є те, чи можна забезпечити позов одного з подружжя до іншого з подружжя про стягнення 1/2 частини вартості час

🔥8👍42🤔2

15 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,550 views15 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

🇺🇸Цікаву ілюстрацію про ризики використання ШІ при обробленні документів в суді описує Reuters. 1️⃣Reuters пише, що суддя штату Коннектикут заявив, що позивач у справі, яка розглядалася перед ним, включив «прихований текст» до судових подань, який мав служити інструкціями для будь-якої системи зі штучним інтелектом, що переглядає документи. 2️⃣Суддя в постанові про санкції від 6 серпня вказав, що суд виявив текст,

15

14 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,820 views16 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

♻️Трохи про способи захисту при нецільовому витрачанні аліментів Постанова КЦС від 29.07.2026 в справі № 756/12781/23 📘Відповідно до статті 179 СК України аліменти, одержані на дитину, є власністю дитини. Той із батьків або інших законних представників дитини, на ім`я якого виплачуються аліменти, розпоряджається аліментами виключно за цільовим призначенням в інтересах дитини. 📒Згідно з статтею 186 СК України контр

11👍5

13 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,810 views4 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

📖Журнал «Цивілістична платформа» готує до випуску номер № 11, присвячений проблематиці недійсності правочинів (url: https://clp.org.ua/avtoram/#idea). 🧠 Замислився над тематикою майбутньої статті.

🔥4

13 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈2,170 views12 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

♻️Трохи про строк дії рішення про визнання фізичної особи щодо рішень, які були ухвалені до 15 грудня 2017 року Постанова КЦС від 29.07.2026 в справі № 495/3492/18 📘Строк дії рішення про визнання фізичної особи недієздатною визначається судом, але не може перевищувати двох років (частина шоста статті 300 ЦПК України). 📒Клопотання про продовження строку дії рішення про визнання фізичної особи недієздатною має право

9👍3

12 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC≈2,050 views3 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

📖Оприлюднено огляд судової практики КЦС ВС за І півріччя 2026 року. url: https://court.gov.ua/storage/portal/supreme/ogliady/Oglyad_KCS_I_pivr_2026.pdf

🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC≈2,050 views8 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @supremecourtua

​Залишення позову без розгляду у зв’язку зі зловживанням процесуальними правами можливе на стадії підготовчого провадження у справі, якщо ознаки зловживання мають очевидний, безсумнівний та процесуально встановлений характер – ВП ВС Застосування заходів запобігання зловживанню процесуальними правами з підстав, передбачених п. 3 ч. 2 ст. 43 ГПК України, який кореспондує п. 3 ч. 2 ст. 44 ЦПК України та п. 3 ч. 2 ст. 4

👍71

10 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈2,430 views32 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

🇯🇵 Потрапила на очі книга про японське право - Hiroshi Oda. Japanese Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. 📖Hiroshi Oda пише, що в Японії доктрину пронизування корпоративної вуалі (piercing the veil of incorporation) запровадив Верховний Суд. 📍Зокрема вказується, що у деяких випадках конструкція юридичної особи використовується задля прикриття особи за корпоративною завісою, наприклад, з метою уникнення звер

22👍10

9 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈2,350 views12 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

♻️Трохи про компанію зі штучного інтелекту 🇺🇸У штаті Делавер пропонується запровадити компанію зі штучного інтелекту. 📖Fortune Media пише, що сучасна корпорація, серійне товариство з обмеженою відповідальністю (series LLC) свого часу теж викликали чимало запеклих дискусій, перш ніж стати загальноприйнятими. 1️⃣Компанія зі штучного інтелекту (Artificial Intelligence Company, або AIC) — це найновіший і водночас найб

🤔7👍31🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @glossema. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 211,603 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Крат Василь Іванович (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…id=100000556016168 Крат Василь Іванович] в Facebook. * Телеграм-канал [https://t.me/glossema Трохи про приватне право] [[Категорія:Судді Верховного Суду України]]…”
read 16 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Трохи про приватне право🧐” (@glossema), 11,078 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glossema.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.