Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дмитрий Терновой

@glitchvangott

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

133subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002520495060
TypeChannel
Username@glitchvangott
DescriptionМузыка, поэзия, выступления, иллюстрации.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/glitchvangott

Growth

1337 Aug 2026, 17:45 — 133 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:17 — 133 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:459 Aug 2026, 00:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:17133no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:45133first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.3
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (1 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total829
Reactions total140
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
403
Videos
57
Links
92

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4733.6%
custom 52516833686968396792215.7%
custom 53887902567723314421712.1%
custom 52829398085098720801510.7%
custom 54160711717769854951410.0%
🔥75.00%
🙏64.29%
custom 524272305760005514053.57%
🤯42.86%
custom 539988365049176382721.43%
custom 528950163377491025110.714%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC27 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Марсюху сегодня вечером укусил ротвейлер, приехали из ветеринарной клиники, дали ему антибиотики. Мышцы и кости целы, прокусана кожа. Виноват я сам и неудачное стечение обстоятельств, будем лечиться.

🙏63

8 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC32 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А вот кадры, на которых удалось запечатлеть ужасное преступление: Кадр А) Я попросил, чтобы мне крикнули в ухо ради фотки и мне кричат. Кадр Б) Уже целуют ❤️ (и немного душат) #любимаяплемяшка

7

7 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC36 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сегодня, я ради прикольной фотки попросил племянницу крикнуть мне в ухо, в итоге я оглох на одно ухо... Умные мысли, как говорится, его преследовали, но он был быстрее. ДипСик говорит, что должно пройти за 24 часа. Вот такие вот новости🤣 Никогда, слышите меня! Никогда!!! Не просите маленьких девочек крикнуть вам в ухо. Фотки потом выложу)

4🤯4

7 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC39 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

* * * Это только синий ладан, Это только сон во сне, Звезды над пустынным садом, Розы на твоём окне. Это то, что в мире этом Называется весной, Тишиной, прохладным светом Над прохладной глубиной. Взмахи черных весел шире, Чище сумрак голубой -- Это то, что в этом мире Называется судьбой. То, что ничего не значит И не знает ни о чем -- Только теплым морем плачет, Только парусом маячит Над обветренным плечом. 1930

🔥7custom 528293980850987208021

6 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC46 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

СЛОВОРОЖДЕСТВО О всемогущий словородный орган! Что первым был в делах Адама, — Потом уж размножаться было надо, Сперва зализанная рана На мирозданье, нанесённая при родах: Ведь не было имён у тех, Кто выплеснулся в свет, Без имени плещась в околоплодных водах. О всемогущий словородный орган! Что облизал фотон природы, — Твой голос эхом помнят электроны, Лишь в зеркало смотря, я понимаю, кто мы. 19.06.26

custom 52829398085098720806custom 52516833686968396793custom 538879025677233144232

5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC57 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ИДИОТАМ — возможно вам, возможно мне вырастают идиоты и живут как идиоты жаль по ним не видно сразу так похожи на людей и себя ведут дебильно в миг когда предельно поздно уже что-то делать с ними просто говоришь забей чтоб не выглядеть уродом чтоб не быть бесчеловечным я ведь тоже так желаю быть похожим на людей 28.07.26

custom 52516833686968396797custom 541607117177698549542custom 52829398085098720802

4 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC71 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

* * * вдохновение выдохновение 04.08.26

7custom 52829398085098720802

3 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC69 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Прекрасное стихотворение Миши: 🪿

custom 53887902567723314424

3 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC73 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @poesiazdes

Лебедь из шин не боится машин. Он сам был когда-то частью машины и знает обняв колесо, мимо едет свернувшийся в коконе будущий лебедь. Михаил Тимофеев

9

3 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC67 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня был супернасыщенный день, поздравляли дядю с днём рождения, во время закупок катал племянницу по супермаркету, а потом мы встретились с Мишей Тимофеевым и пошли смотреть нашу прекрасную смоленскую крепостную стену.

custom 54160711717769854958custom 525168336869683967931custom 52895016337749102511

2 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTCviews —1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52516833686968396791

2 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC73 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Весь остальной день мы бесимся с племянницей, ей 4,5 года. Сегодня мы копали, строили дом, бились на подушках, играли в "Красная шапочка и волк", волком была Маша, потом на надувном жирафе мы прыгали через полосу препятствий, потом меня били цветком топинамбура, потом мы встретили ёжика, катались на качелях, закапывали сокровища, ели Растишку (хотя куда уже), расставляли вместе смайлики индивидуально каждому из участ

custom 52516833686968396798custom 528293980850987208032custom 54160711717769854952custom 53998836504917638271

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @glitchvangott. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 768,403 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дмитрий Терновой” (@glitchvangott), 133 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glitchvangott.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.