Channel
@glebtalks
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
434subscribers
+44 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004343197728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glebtalks |
| Created | 31 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glebtalks |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 08:54 | 434 | +3 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 431 | +1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 430 | +29 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 401 | +11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 390 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 390 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
365 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 180 | 49.3% | |
| 💯 | 70 | 19.2% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 15.1% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 7.12% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 6.03% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.822% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.548% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.548% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.548% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.274% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.274% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.274% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 365 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня встречался с блогером который делает запуски на 8-12 миллионов в месяц. Наша ниша. Поделиться мыслями с вами на тему мышления данного человека и чем он отличается от обычных тренеров?
💯28❤12
Как вести 250 клиентов в онлайне, или как ИИ уничтожит работу тренера Последние полгода я всё чаще слышу от тренеров, маркетологов и фитнес-инфлюенсеров одну мысль: ИИ убьёт профессию тренера. Скоро клиенту не понадобится человек — нейросеть сама посчитает калории и БЖУ, напишет программу тренировок, проверит отчёты и будет отвечать 24/7 за $20–30 в месяц. И будто в подтверждение этого DDX выкатывает в приложение И…
❤17👍16🔥10👏3🤝2
Может ли мужчина поднимать руку на женщину? В ночь с 31 августа на 1 сентября произошло событие, которое сейчас активно обсуждают в нельзяграмме. Меня эта история задела до глубины души, и я не могу не высказаться. Контекст: один «известный в узких кругах» спортсмен из мира бодибилдинга, по опубликованной информации, жестоко избил свою девушку. На фото и видео — сильнейшие побои и травмы. Это пиздец, товарищи. Са…
❤71💯37❤🔥4🔥2
Дайте вектор следующего поста, что вам интересно? Мыслей много, но я не хочу вывалить на вас все скопом. Выбирайте ❤️
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤5✍2🏆2
Хочу всем сказать огромное спасибо за ваши реакции, вовлечение, комментарии.. Мне очень ценно ❤️ Есть ощущение, что это некий личный дневник с своей локальной (моей) тусовкой) Комментарии не стесняйтесь писать, пишите, как можно больше) Буду отвечать всем
❤14❤🔥6🔥4💯1😁1
Как комплексы, обида и злость формируют мышление человека на десятки миллионов Последний час я думал, с чего начать вести этот канал. Мыслей на самом деле очень много. И мне немного трепетно, потому что здесь собрались вы — люди, которым интересен я как человек, мой бизнес и всё, через что я прохожу. Даже сейчас, пока пишу этот текст, чувствую лёгкую ответственность. Поэтому первый пост будет о том, что указано в …
❤35🔥22❤🔥12💯4🤩1😍1
Глеб «вещает» pinned «Дорогие друзья, я создал свой личный Telegram-канал. Здесь буду делиться с вами своими мыслями, наблюдениями, решениями и ошибками. Показывать, что происходит в моей жизни, у меня в голове и внутри моей компании. Рассказывать не только о результатах, но и…»
Дорогие друзья, я создал свой личный Telegram-канал. Здесь буду делиться с вами своими мыслями, наблюдениями, решениями и ошибками. Показывать, что происходит в моей жизни, у меня в голове и внутри моей компании. Рассказывать не только о результатах, но и о переживаниях, сомнениях и выводах, к которым прихожу по дороге. По сути, это будет мой личный дневник — место, где я смогу говорить с вами открыто, иногда излив…
❤26🔥17👍10
Posted without readable text
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @glebtalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Дайте вектор следующего поста, что вам интересно? Мыслей много, но я не хочу вывалить на вас все скопом. Выбирайте ❤️
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глеб «вещает»” (@glebtalks), 434 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glebtalks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.