Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ɢʟᴇʙᴏᴠɴᴀ™/закрыто

Channel

ɢʟᴇʙᴏᴠɴᴀ™/закрыто

@glebovna52

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003355280872
TypeChannel
Username@glebovna52
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 18 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/glebovna52

Growth

2628277 August 2026 — 28 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:5626-2
11 Aug 2026, 06:4628no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:0228first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1343.3%
💔620.0%
custom 5458497928173744468516.7%
custom 534831296026145082226.67%
custom 546520603572990634926.67%
🍌26.67%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 5 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jan 2026, 21:30 UTC85 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

такс, ну здрасьте всем как вы могли заметить, ну или не могли, я повыходила со всех каналов, в которых я была. прошу принять мои извинения. в общем, что я хотела сказать. я больше не буду вести фан соц сети, так как пропало желание. это никак не связано с моей личной жизнью, просто пропало желание🤷‍♂️ надеюсь вы не забудете меня и будете хоть чуток вспоминать, хотя кому оно надо. короче, тгк не удаляю, может через

💔6🍌2custom 534831296026145082221

25 Jan 2026, 15:18 UTC72 viewsread 11 August 2026

мне просто не хочется с кем то болтать в личке, поэтому я пишу в канал всякую фигню

25 Jan 2026, 15:17 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ну знаете, мне прям комфортно с ними. я когда их не вижу мне не по себе и жизнь становится мрачной

1

25 Jan 2026, 14:50 UTC68 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

когда я смотрела осд, мне так хорошо было на душе, а сейчас я смотрю другой фильм и мне как-то вообще не очень смотреть что-либо другое. я стала зависима🫤

custom 545849792817374446852custom 54652060357299063492

24 Jan 2026, 06:35 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

отмените зиму пж, я опять заболела

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @glebovna52. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ɢʟᴇʙᴏᴠɴᴀ™/закрыто” (@glebovna52), 26 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glebovna52.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.