Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Глеб Орëл - Олимпиадный Преподаватель по Физике

Channel

Глеб Орëл - Олимпиадный Преподаватель по Физике

@gleborel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,936subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001354469970
TypeChannel
Username@gleborel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gleborel

Growth

1,9081,9361,9222 September 2026 — 1,908 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,908 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,909 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,936 subscribers2 September 20266 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,904–1,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 12:421,936+27
2 Sept 2026, 11:131,909+1
2 Sept 2026, 03:451,908no change
2 Sept 2026, 03:301,908first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.4%
avg views ÷ 1,936 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held20 (23 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total20,273
Reactions total877
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

877 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥61570.1%
14816.9%
💯303.42%
192.17%
🎉151.71%
❤‍🔥131.48%
111.25%
🕊111.25%
👍101.14%
🤩50.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 877 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC488 views70 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

Яан Калда — легенда олимпиадной физики 🇪🇪 Эстонский физик, профессор Таллиннского технического университета, выпускник МФТИ. Много лет готовил сборную Эстонии к IPhO и составлял задачи для международной олимпиады. А также составитель Physics Cup, Эстонской олимпиады, EuPhO и т.д. Известен он также своими методичками — «Mechanics», «Electrical Circuits», «Optics» и другими. Материал там построен не по темам, а по иде

🔥655

1 Sept 2026, 19:04 UTC477 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Всех с днём знаний! Успехов и побед в учебе! Возьмите весь максимум знаний!🧑‍🎓 Заодно хочу с вами поделится переводом сборника задач от Яана Калды по механике, о чём и следующий пост)

6🤩5🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 09:24 UTC666 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Подкаст про физфак МГУ 🧑‍🎓 Позвал Диму, студента 5 курса физфака, и расспросил обо всём, что обычно не пишут в брошюрах для абитуриентов: проходные баллы и ДВИ, как устроена сессия, что такое кафедра и как её выбрать, много ли отчисляют, как живут в общагах и сколько платят в науке. Отдельно поговорили о том, стоит ли идти на физфак, если ты не гений — и кому туда точно не надо. Смотреть: YouTube — https://youtu.b

9👍3🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC817 views86 reactionsread 2 September 2026

в 11-м классе стал победителем всех перечней, что я писал Это чистая кристальная ложь! Если бы формулировка была такой: в 11-м классе стал победителем всех перечней, что я писал ПО ФИЗИКЕ то это было бы ВЕРНО, ведь я действительно: ▶️Победитель Физтеха 40/50 ▶️Победитель Курчатова 59/60 ▶️Победитель МОШ(было жестко) (77.5/100) ▶️Победитель Шага в Будущее(да, та самая олимпиада от Бомонки) балл не помню ▶️Абсолютный п

🔥788

30 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC850 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

Вот такую красоту сегодня изучили! Вы набрали на стриме больше 60-ти лайков, так что запись на ютубе останется, приятного просмотра и бота! Кстати, напомню про разоблачение фактов: в посте здесь надо набрать 90 огоньков, чтобы вышел следующий пост про факты)

🔥37💯4

30 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC812 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7🎉5🕊4💯3

30 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC813 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtube.com/live/HGD3n8BLkFw?feature=share

🔥11

30 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC867 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

В честь начала учебного года промокод SEPTEMBER26 дает скидку 26% на все смены на сайте КУРСЫ, КОТОРЫЕ НАУЧАТ Бандл "ОТ ДУШИ" , который образует ПОЛНОЦЕННЫЙ годовой курс, сейчас стоит 44 444 руб Со скидкой по этому промокоду стоит 32 888 руб! ▶️доступ к записям, ментору, проверке домашек и решениям домашек 2 года ▶️450 часов вебинаров == 90 вебинаров, в среднем по 5 часов каждый ▶️курс дает знания на уровень побед

8🔥6

29 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC928 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

вот такую красоту сегодня поизучали! На стриме 60 лайков набрали, так что запись останется, полюбуетесь этой красотой у меня в разделе трансляции на ютуб канале)

26🔥13

29 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC917 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯95🔥4

29 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC955 views110 reactionsread 2 September 2026

сдал ЕГЭ по физике в 11-м классе меньше чем на 80 баллов Это чистая правда Мои баллы за ЯГУ: 73 - русский язык, кстати, это оценка 5(прям на грани) 94 - профильная математика, мне очень нравится ЕГЭ по математике Физику призер ВсОШ писать не обязан, но топовая школа попросила повысить средний балл! 78... вот повысил, прям повысил:) Не все всеросники и межнарники ботают оформление ЕГЭ. Например, не все из них знаю

🔥995👍2💯2🕊2

28 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC973 views122 reactionsread 2 September 2026

в 10-м классе брал перечни ЗА 11-й класс Барабанная дробь....🥁 Это правда В 10-м классе я писал олимпиады ЗА 11-й класс: ▶️Победитель олимпиады Физтех ЗА 11-й класс — писал в 2021-м году и набрал 46/50 баллов ▶️Я тогда по приколу зарегался на несколько перечней за 11-й, рассказал Славику, и он спросил: "А МОШ? Ты знаешь, что МОШ местами сложнее финала ВсОШ?" Я НЕ ЗНАЛ этого, но как-то стал призером МОШ 2021-го г

🔥96❤‍🔥13121

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gleborel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTCAnonymous Poll453 voters

Какие факты об мне являются верными?

  1. в 10-м классе брал перечни ЗА 11-й класс69%
  2. в 11-м классе стал победителем всех перечней, что я писал47%
  3. учусь на известном факультете программистов ФПМИ МФТИ72%
  4. сдал ЕГЭ по физике в 11-м классе меньше чем на 80 баллов33%
  5. я эксперт ЕГЭ23%
  6. преподаю в московской школе48%
  7. предпочитаю преподавать олимпиады, а не ЕГЭ83%

The shares total 375%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Английский по плейлистам
@engplaylists · 30,960
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
Никита Мешин | Экстремум | Профильная Математика
@EXtremumMath · 32,855
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Глеб Орëл - Олимпиадный Преподаватель по Физике” (@gleborel), 1,936 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gleborel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.