Channel
@glazory_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003396858907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glazory_lab |
| Description | Лаборатория. Делаем художественный фарфор. Японские маски. Елочные игрушки. предметы интерьера. Сотрудничество. Коллаборации. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glazory_lab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 | 64 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:48 | 64 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
70 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 45.7% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 10.0% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 7.14% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
29 августа я еду в Лух на фестиваль «Лук-Лучок» и, конечно, везу с собой фарфоровые луки-подсвечники. Мне давно близка тема сада, грядки, растений и привычных вещей, которые мы видим почти каждый день. Лук в моей работе появился в нескольких формах: есть округлые, почти приземистые луковицы, есть вытянутые и графичные. Мне очень хочется впервые показать их именно здесь, среди людей, для которых лук настоящее дело ж…
❤8👍5
глазорий pinned a video
Ростов-на-Дону! 15 и 16 августа в 14:00 собираемся на гончарный мастер-класс делать свое изделие из настоящего фарфора на нашем мини- производстве. Это будут небольшие группы по 7 человек, лепим, крутим из фарфора или другой посудной массы. Покажу базовые приемы, распишем, в теме нет ограничений! Если у вас есть свои задумки и пожелания смело пишите, помогу их воплотить. Если не знаете что выбрать - подскажу вари…
❤4
Как ощущается моя лента в соц сетях, после публикаций о том, что есть в наличии фарфоровые огурчиках в банках 🤌✨
❤5😁5🔥4🤣2
Ростов-на-Дону! Продолжаем лепить крутить и расписывать ! В это воскресенье 19-го июля в 14.00 приглашаем на наше мини-производство на трехчасовой мастер-класс по лепке из фарфора. Умения не обязательны, мы все покажем и расскажем. Если вы что-то давно хотели слепить, то можете смело присылать свои идеи в комментарии под этот пост или в личные сообщения.
❤3
Есть у меня любимый рилс, который недооценен. Потому что у меня наверно странный вкус и косяки на керамических производствах это не интересно. Но зато мне было весело его записывать. Делюсь! Забытые заветы предков, вспомнили и вновь зафиксировали в памяти, а именно - нормально делай, а не думай и нормально будет 🤌✨
😁8🔥4👏3
Изделия с мастер-класса заглажены, им осталось дождаться обжига. Так как группа была на половину детской, а на вторую половину взрослой, на прошедшем занятии использовалась каменная масса с добавлением шамота. Она проще в лепке. Так что кружки можно будет использовать по прямому назначению 😄 Хороших выходных! Если есть желание, то посмотрите как я заглаживаю ручки и чашки 🫶
❤7👍1
До обжига глазурь может выглядеть совсем иначе, чем после печи. Это не краска, а стеклянный порошок в водной суспензии. Поэтому во время нанесения цвет часто не совпадает с тем, каким он станет после обжига. На видео вытянутый подсвечник «Лук» в светло-зеленом селадоне. Заказать этот или другие подсвечники можно в директ или на сайте glazory.ru
❤5🤝5👍1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @glazory_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“глазорий” (@glazory_lab), 64 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glazory_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.