Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГЛАВТЕХ подкаст

Channel

ГЛАВТЕХ подкаст

@glavteh_podcast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

160subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002435373372
TypeChannel
Username@glavteh_podcast
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/glavteh_podcast

Growth

1561601587 August 2026 — 156 subscribers8 August 2026 — 156 subscribers15 August 2026 — 160 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 155–161 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:24160+4
8 Aug 2026, 18:30156no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:14156first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.6%
avg views ÷ 160 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.4
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (4 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total556
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2623.0%
🤣1614.2%
👍1513.3%
1412.4%
🤡87.08%
🤝65.31%
🤬54.42%
💔43.54%
💊32.65%
🔥32.65%
21.77%
👎21.77%
👏21.77%
🤯21.77%
👌10.885%
👻10.885%
🕊10.885%
🤷‍♂10.885%
🦄10.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC35 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Таргетирование месседжа после правок в ЦА «собачники»

🤣4😁1

3 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC41 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Партия пытается попасть в ЦА на кампании 2026

🤣4😁3

29 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC68 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Россиянам следует воздержаться от покупок подписок и финансовых операций в Telegram до разъяснений Роскомнадзора и ФСБ — Свинцов

🤡3🤣2😁2

29 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В целом, противостояние Дурова с представителями политико-силового блока, мягко говоря, вторые не смогут выиграть у первого. Сколько там уже пытаются “заблокировать телеграм”? И всё что-то никак. И дело отнюдь не в том, что это такая вот полумера. Дело в том, что это СЛОЖНОВАТО. А вот снести одним махом на платформе все РФ-ресурсы, в которые закатано ОЧЕНЬ много денег, времени и сил, это очень легко. И ни в каком мак

11🤝1

29 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC64 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В целом, можно будет сообщить, что это ответ Дронову🗣

💔2👻1🕊1🤣1😁1

23 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC201 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Коммерсантъ» сообщает, что военкор Поддубный задекларировал акции Apple, Intel, Procter & Gamble и паи американских фондов. Поддубный, напоминаю, кандидат в депутаты. Степень про... утерянности полимеров не перестаёт восхищать даже самых насмотренных.

😁4🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC87 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У читателя Дениса вопрос к автору поста (совершенно безотносительно оценки деятельности обоих упомянутых в посте личностей). Стал бы автор излагать свою точку зрения по любому из вопросов, осознавая, что это может быть чревато лишением источников дохода?

1🤷‍♂1😁1

22 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @auantonov

Сны губернатора Филимонова при температуре 39. А, нет, это всё реально происходит.

🤡2🤯2😁2

20 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC94 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В Вологодской области Новые люди упоролись чем-то совершенно не вкуривают собственные нарративы. Вот, к примеру, они машут флагом на открытии памятника, одной из фигур на котором является товарищ Сталин (мне он не товарищ, а вот новолюдам вполне, видимо). Тут, конечно, ребята могут начать прогонять телегу о том, что приходили памятник Бардину открывать, и так уж вышло. И даже почему так вышло, вполне понятно. Всё-та

😁4🤝1🦄1

6 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,550 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новая кровь в старой системе, «правые» темы, внутренняя кухня ЛДПР и трансформация партии — в разговоре с Марией Воропаевой. В этом выпуске мы с Первым заместителем Руководителя ЦА ЛДПР, депутатом Московской Городской Думы Марией Воропаевой обсуждаем, как меняется политическая система и что остаётся неизменным: от внутренней кухни партии до вопросов о политической системе в России, цензуре и «доносчиках». Слушать:

👍54🔥2👎1

5 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC124 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже завтра выйдет выпуск с Марией Воропаевой. -С чем ЛДПР идёт в Госдуму? -Что не так с демографической политикой? -Что волнует молодежь? -Как спасти экономику?

8👍6🤝4👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @glavteh_podcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГЛАВТЕХ подкаст” (@glavteh_podcast), 160 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glavteh_podcast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.