Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Worldwide CEO

Channel

Worldwide CEO

@glavniypomiry

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

318subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003911642749
TypeChannel
Username@glavniypomiry
Created8 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/glavniypomiry

Growth

318331324.57 August 2026 — 331 subscribers8 August 2026 — 330 subscribers8 August 2026 — 330 subscribers14 August 2026 — 318 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 316–333 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:38318-12
8 Aug 2026, 07:17330no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:26330-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:34331first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.5%
avg views ÷ 318 subscribers
Avg views / post
227
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (8 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total909
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3850.0%
🏆2228.9%
🔥810.5%
33.95%
22.63%
🤡22.63%
🌚11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC59 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Банковская эмиссия или почему ты не сможешь работать по трансграну Часто в профильных чатах мне приходится наблюдать одну и ту же ситуацию, где трейдер из разных уголков планеты вдруг решил, что он будет обрабатывать ру трафик сидя в индонезии и купив дропов за рис Они просят офферы, приходят к платёжкам и ночуют под дверьми, лишь бы пихнуть своё абсолютно уебанское решение смысл которого будет разбит об комиссии.

4🏆2🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC152 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Результаты розыгрыша: Победители: 1. Виктор (6240133982) 2. BMW М2 (6977892864) 3. Gorzam (7111985732) 4. Kos (1050703307) 5. No name (1860071621) 6. victm (6305469957) 7. георгий (689199349) 8. 001 (6528156116) 9. Flotik (7363641637) 10. Mel (6830473982)

3🔥2🤡2

28 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC196 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ты молодец, если не отключил уведомления на канале и не закинул его в архив, когда пришёл сюда за шальными монетками с гива. Пока ждал, как вы набираетесь, долго думал о том, насколько вам повезло попасть именно сюда среди десятков ctrl c + ctrl v каналов, каждый из которых снова и снова нихуя вам не даёт. Если ты мой новый подписчик, тогда, во-первых, я хочу поздороваться. А во-вторых, делаю тебе быстрый ликбез п

6🏆3🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC502 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

РОЗЫГРЫШ 1000$ ОТ P2P КАНАЛОВ 🪙 Мы запускаем розыгрыш, где КАЖДЫЙ сможет выиграть. 🥇 1 место - 350$ 🥈 2 место - 200$ 🥉 3 место - 100$ 4-10 место - по 50$ Чтобы принять участие нужно всего лишь подписаться на каналы ниже: > ROYAL FINANCE > ЖИРИНОВСКИЙ КРУТИТ > ASP 3.0 > NE PROCESSING > ОФЕРЫ PHR > ВЫСОКИЙ РИСК > ЛАБУБА > WORLDWIDE CEO Затем нажать кнопку под постом👇 Хотим подметить, что использование ботов строго

17 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC356 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Казахстан Алга Посидел сегодня на одном созвоне, где в очередной раз намазывали уши маслом хавающей всё подряд аудитории (ру трейдерам), только теперь намазыватели пошли ещё дальше собственных пиздёжных способностей, перенося свой пиздёж уже даже за границу государств (трансграничный пиздёж) Говорит на белом глазу: «У нас отличная стата. В Казахстане ни один трейдер не ушел в минус и все отлично работают» Да ты чё

7🏆62🌚1

16 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC229 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Почему 99% самопровозглашенных тимлидов не пройдут проверку на проф пригодность в других гео Каждый день я изумляюсь от того, сколько появилось тимлидов. Я изумлялся год назад. Изумлялся полгода назад. И я бля ваще не прекращаю изумляться. Вы вообще понимаете, что человек, у которого хватило денег заказать аватарку и вписать своими никогда не трогавшими работы пальцами приписку TL в нике - это теперь человек, котор

4🏆4

7 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC165 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Кто я такой? Не имеет особого значения. иначе зачем бы мне нужна была маска в моих первоклассных и неотразимых иишных видосах? Первый вопрос исчерпан, значит последуем за вторым. Зачем я здесь? А это уже гораздо интереснее. Начав с кардинга, а закончив работой с российским чистейшим как слеза младенца гембетом, я понял одну простую истину: свято место пусто не бывает. И пускай место уже давно и не такое святое, о

7🏆7🔥3

2 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC135 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Конец процессинговой стабильности Вас яро пытаются подбодрить, сместить фокус с рабочих проблем на «Цикличность рынка», «Скоро отпустит» - читай как сделать всё, чтобы ты остался в упряжке и не вывел страховой до момента, пока не появится новый распиздатейший метод, на котором ты конечно же обязательно заработаешь. ТЕПЕРЬ ТОЧНО. Ок, а что дальше? Ты вообще как давно выводил какие-то около солидные деньги на то, чт

53

18 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC144 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Банки крутят гайки, органы хотят посадить, тимлидов стало больше, чем трейдеров, а большинство площадок уже даже не скрывают примесей говна в своём чистейшем гембете. Площадки-однодневки скамятся одна за одной, а прибыль становится несоизмерима рискам. Рынок российского процессинга сейчас - это жизнь от метода до метода, который тебе ещё должны выдать, если снизойдут до тебя, обычного смертного трейдера. А если нет

2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @glavniypomiry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 893,931 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Worldwide CEO” (@glavniypomiry), 318 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glavniypomiry.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.